C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
synthesis of 1 (Figure S7). These results illustrate that the SAT-mediated
protein-protein interactions are highly specific.
To probe whether an alternative priming pathway exists for
Hpm3 in the presence of small-molecule precursors, we chemically
synthesized the N-acetylcysteamine thioester hexaketide, 2-SNAC
(Scheme S3). LC-MS analysis revealed that 1 was produced by
Hpm3 in the presence of 2-SNAC in high yield (Figure 2D). The
Hpm3-SAT0 mutant was similarly primed with 2-SNAC and
produced 1 in comparable yield to the wild type (Figure 2E). This
result shows that although the SAT domain is necessary for protein
interaction, small-molecule precursors can be directly captured by
Hpm3 to initiate biosynthesis of 1. This SAT-independent pathway
is probably facilitated by the direct priming of the KS domain
(Figure 1). This is consistent with the SAT domains being
dispensable in the precursor-directed biosynthesis of polyketide
analogues by PKS1312 and Gibberella fujikuroi PKS4.13
Synthesis and structural confirmation of 1 have demonstrated that
all ∼30 catalytic steps in the synthesis of 1 were reconstituted, including
(i) formation of the reduced ketide acyl intermediate 2 by Hpm8, (ii)
communication between the two proteins and successful transfer of
the acyl intermediate, and (iii) correct processing of the reduced
intermediate by Hpm3. The presence of the single RAL 1 also
illustrates that only the completed hexaketide can be transferred to
the downstream enzyme and elongated into an RAL. Despite this, free
2-SNAC can be transformed to 1 by Hpm3.
Figure 2. Reconstitution of the Hpm iterative PKSs. HPLC analysis (300
nm) of polyketides synthesized by (A) Hpm8, (B) Hpm8 and Hpm3, (C) Hpm8
and Hpm3-SAT0, (D) Hpm3 with 2 mM 2-SNAC, and (E) Hpm3-SAT0
with 2 mM 2-SNAC. Megasynthases were added to 10 µM. In reactions
(A-C), 2 mM NADPH and malonyl-CoA were added to PBS buffer (pH 7.4).
BJ5464-NpgA host was transformed with expression plasmids for both
Hpm8 and Hpm3 and cultured as described by Reeves et al.3 The extract
of the culture afforded a compound with the same RT on a chiral HPLC
column and the UV absorbance and mass fragmentation pattern as the in
vitro-synthesized compound shown in Figure 2B. Purification and NMR
analysis supported the structure of 1. It was then crystallized, and
subsequent X-ray analysis showed 1 to have 6′S,10′S stereochemistry
(Figure S5). Although the 10′S stereochemistry was expected, as the
absolute stereochemistry of Hpm is known,5b the 6′S configuration was
surprising. If the KR domain were to catalyze all of the the keto reduction
steps with the same facial stereochemistry, one would expect the final
compound to be the 6′R,10′S diastereomer, as initially proposed.3
To assess the kinetics of the synthesis of 1, we quantified the product
level by using [2-14C]malonyl-CoA and radioactive thin-layer chroma-
tography. When Hpm3 was fixed at 5 µM, the initial velocity of formation
of 1 varied linearly with increasing concentrations of Hpm8, yielding an
apparent rate constant of 0.11 min-1 (Figure S6A). In contrast, when the
Hpm8 concentration was fixed at 10, 20, or 30 µM, the initial velocities
of formation of 1 at different Hpm3 concentrations were essentially
constant at 1.1, 2.04, and 3.88 µM min-1, respectively (Figure S6B). The
overall reaction velocity was independent of Hpm3 concentration within
this concentration range. Thus, synthesis of the hexaketide intermediate
from malonyl-CoA catalyzed by Hpm8 is the rate-limiting step. Transfer
of this acyl intermediate to Hpm3 and the subsequent formation of 1 are
faster, resulting in the rapid scavenging and offloading of 2-Hpm8 by
Hpm3.
The SAT domain at the N-terminus of Hpm3 is the most likely
candidate to facilitate crosstalk between the two enzymes.11 To probe
the role of SAT, the Hpm3 point mutant Hpm3-SAT0 was constructed
by mutating the putative active site Ser121 within the GXSXG motif
to alanine. Synthesis of 1 was completely abolished in the in vitro
reaction containing Hpm3-SAT0 and Hpm8 (Figure 2C), confirming
that the catalytic activity of the SAT domain is essential for acyl transfer
between the proteins. To examine the specificity of the SAT domain
toward the partner PKS, we paired Hpm8 with the functionally
equivalent PKS13 from the Gibberella zeae zearalenone pathway.12
Surprisingly, they failed to function in tandem, and no RAL products
were detected. We then constructed a hybrid downstream PKS, PKSH1,
in which the Hpm3 SAT domain was replaced with the noncognate PKS13
SAT domain. While PKSH1 was solubly expressed and all of the the
domains were active in the presence of 2-SNAC (see below), the hybrid
enzyme was not able to communicate with Hpm8 with respect to the
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. Chris Reeves for the generous
gifts of pKOS518-120A and pKOS518-118A. Crystallographic analysis
of 1 was done by Dr. Michael Ferguson (University of Alberta). This
work was supported by NIH Grant 1R01GM085128, a David and
Lucile Packard Fellowship to Y.T., the Natural Sciences and Engineer-
ing Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Canada Research
Chair in Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry.
Note Added after ASAP Publication. The structure of hypothe-
mycin in Figure 1 was corrected on March 16, 2010.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details and
spectroscopic information. This material is available free of charge via
References
(1) (a) Keller, N. P.; Turner, G.; Bennett, J. W. Nat. ReV. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 937.
(b) Brase, S.; Encinas, A.; Keck, J.; Nising, C. F. Chem. ReV. 2009, 109, 3903.
(2) (a) Kim, Y. T.; Lee, Y. R.; Jin, J.; Han, K. H.; Kim, H.; Kim, J. C.; Lee,
T.; Yun, S. H.; Lee, Y. W. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 58, 1102. (b) Gaffoor,
I.; Trail, F. Appl. EnViron. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1793.
(3) Reeves, C. D.; Hu, Z.; Reid, R.; Kealey, J. T. Appl. EnViron. Microbiol.
2008, 74, 5121.
(4) Wang, S.; Xu, Y.; Maine, E. A.; Wijeratne, E. M.; Espinosa-Artiles, P.;
Gunatilaka, A. A.; Molnar, I. Chem. Biol. 2008, 15, 1328.
(5) (a) Schirmer, A.; Kennedy, J.; Murli, S.; Reid, R.; Santi, D. V. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 4234. (b) Rastelli, G.; Rosenfeld, R.; Reid,
R.; Santi, D. V. J. Struct. Biol. 2008, 164, 18.
(6) (a) Cox, R. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 2010. (b) Ma, S. M.; Li, J. W.;
Choi, J. W.; Zhou, H.; Lee, K. K.; Moorthie, V. A.; Xie, X.; Kealey, J. T.;
Da Silva, N. A.; Vederas, J. C.; Tang, Y. Science 2009, 326, 589.
(7) Watanabe, C. M.; Townsend, C. A. Chem. Biol. 2002, 9, 981.
(8) Chiang, Y. M.; Szewczyk, E.; Davidson, A. D.; Keller, N.; Oakley, B. R.;
Wang, C. C. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2965.
(9) (a) Dorrestein, P. C.; Kelleher, N. L. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 893. (b)
Meluzzi, D.; Zheng, W. H.; Hensler, M.; Nizet, V.; Dorrestein, P. C. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 3107.
(10) (a) Cheng, Q.; Xiang, L.; Izumikawa, M.; Meluzzi, D.; Moore, B. S. Nat. Chem.
Biol. 2007, 3, 557. (b) An, J. H.; Kim, Y. S. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998, 257, 395.
(11) Crawford, J. M.; Dancy, B. C.; Hill, E. A.; Udwary, D. W.; Townsend,
C. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103, 16728.
(12) Zhou, H.; Zhan, J.; Watanabe, K.; Xie, X.; Tang, Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 2008, 105, 6249.
(13) (a) Crawford, J. M.; Vagstad, A. L.; Whitworth, K. P.; Ehrlich, K. C.;
Townsend, C. A. ChemBioChem 2008, 9, 1019. (b) Ma, S. M.; Zhan, J.;
Watanabe, K.; Xie, X.; Zhang, W.; Wang, C. C.; Tang, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 10642.
JA100060K
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 13, 2010 4531