1676
R. C. Lemoine et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 1674–1676
N N
N
N N
exo-1
endo-1
exo-5
endo-5
NH2
NHAc
H
NHAc
H
N
(g)
(b), (c)
(a)
(d), (e), (f)
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
N
Boc
N
Boc
N
Bn
N
H
N
Bn
(h)
R
exo-7
endo-7
O
NHBoc
H
HN
H
O
F
(i), (j)
N
N
N
exo-8
endo-8
a
R =
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
H
N
N
F
R
F
F
b
c
O
HN
(h), (i), (j)
(h), (i), (j)
HN
9
O
F
N
N
N
N
F
R
O
F
HN
10
HN
N
d
N
N
N
N
N
N
F
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions (yields in parentheses are first for the endo- and then for the exo-bicyclic systems): (a) Ac2O, pyridine, CH2Cl2, rt, 3 h (51%, 38%); (b) HCl
4 M in dioxane, CH2Cl2, rt, 2 h; (c) PhCHO, NaBH(OAc)3, CH2Cl2, rt, overnight (56%, 75% over two steps); (d) PCl5, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 2 h; (e) AcNHNH2, THF/CH2Cl2, 0 °C to rt,
overnight; (f) AcOH catalytic, ClCH2CH2Cl, reflux, 2 h (67%, 50% over three steps); (g) H2 (1 atm), Pd(OH)2, MeOH, rt, overnight; (h) 6, NaBH(OAc)3, CH2Cl2, rt, 2 h (53%, 54%
over two steps); (i) HCl 4 M in dioxane, CH2Cl2, rt, 2 h; (j) RCOOH, EDCI, HOBt, DIPEA (or Et3N), CH2Cl2 (20–85% over two steps).
modeling, template 2 might be an effective replacement of the
Table 1
conformationally restricted 8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane found in
RANTES binding inhibition, and antiviral activity of exo-8(a–d), endo-8(a–d), 9a,d,
and 10(a–d)
maraviroc. It is known from the SAR that led to the discovery of
maraviroc8 and that of our own discovery program,9 that as far
Compounds
Bindinga,c (nM)
Antiviralb,c (nM)
as antiviral activity was concerned, hydrophobic groups in the tail
were better tolerated than more polar ones (e.g., 10b and 10d com-
pared to 10a and 10c), that a larger hydrophobic group was better
tolerated than smaller ones (10d compared to 10b), and that the
tetrahydrofuran ring was better tolerated than the tetrahydropy-
ran ring (10a compared to 10c). We observed similar properties
in the case of the compounds using template 2 (i.e., exo/endo-8a
compared to exo/endo-8c, and exo/endo-8b compared to exo/
endo-8d). However, compounds with hydrophobic groups in the
exo sub-series were surprisingly less potent than the compounds
with polar groups. This indicated to us that the series had a slightly
different binding mode than that maraviroc, and that more SAR
exploration would be required to further optimize both the endo
and the exo sub-series. However, no other compounds were pre-
pared in this new series of CCR5 antagonists.
Maraviroc
Exo-8a
Exo-8b
Exo-8c
Exo-8d
Endo-8a
Endo-8b
Endo-8c
Endo-8d
9a
1.4
35
6
43
—
18
6
30
8
—
38
7
2.8
40
200
P625
81
210
74
P625
41
P625
P625
62
9d
10a
10b
10c
5
13
5
24
220
5
10d
Binding inhibition (IC50) of [128I]-RANTES to CCR5-expressing CHO cells.
Replication inhibition (IC50) of R5 HIVNLBal in JC53-BL cells.
Values are means of at least two experiments.
a
b
c
Based on functional activity, we showed that the bicyclic exo
and endo 5-amino-3-azabicyclo[3.3.0]octanes were effective, but
not equal, replacements for the conformationally restricted 3-ami-
no-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octane of the CCR5 antagonist maraviroc.
The introduction of this template into other series of CCR5 antag-
onists will be described in due course.
It is noteworthy to point out the discrepancy between the RAN-
TES binding inhibition and the activity in the antiviral assay. This
indicated to us that binding inhibition was not necessarily corre-
lated with functional inhibition. We hypothesized that upon bind-
ing, the antagonist induces a change of conformation in the
receptor, which in turn prevents the binding of HIVNLBal to CCR5.
Mechanistically, it is still not clear to us why one antagonist would
induce a conformational change leading to a better antiviral activ-
ity than another antagonist. The RANTES binding inhibition assay
was thus used as the first line assay, while we only compared com-
pounds with each other based on their functional antiviral activity.
The piperidine compounds 9a and 9d were devoid of any mea-
surable antiviral activity (upper limit of the assay = 625 nM) while
the direct maraviroc-like equivalents showed reasonable antiviral
activity for 10a (62 nM) and single digit nanomolar activity for
10d (5 nM). Interestingly, exo/endo-8a and exo/endo-8d were still
active in the antiviral assay. We attributed some of the activity to
the increased rigidity of template 2 compared to the piperidine
ring. This was the first indication that, as we had anticipitated from
References and notes
1. Lemoine, R.; Wanner, J. Curr. Topics Med. Chem., in press.
2. MOE software version 2006.08 available from the Chemical Computing Group Inc.,
3. MAESTRO software version 8.5 available from Schrodinger Software Inc., 101 SW
4. pKas values were calculated using Moka Linux version 20090616 T.
5. Lee, H.-Y.; An, M.; Sohn, J.-H. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2003, 24, 539.
6. Stupple, P. A. PCT Int. Appl. WO2005033107.
7. For details on these assays, please see: Melville, C. R.; Rotstein, D. M. PCT Int.
Appl. WO2008119663.
8. Wood, A.; Armour, D. Prog. Med. Chem. 2005, 43, 239.
9. Rotstein, D. M.; Melville, C. R.; Padilla, F.; Cournoyer, D.; Lee, E. K.; Lemoine, R.;
Petersen, A. Setti, L. Q.; Wanner, J.; Chen, L.; Filonova, L.; Loughhead, D.; Manka,
J.; Lin, X.-F.; Gleason, S.; Sankuratri, S.; Ji, C.; de Rosier, A.; Dioszegi, M.; Heilek,
G.; Jekle, A.; Berry, P.; Mau, C.-I.; Weller, P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., in
preparation.