we were able to increase the S/C ratio to 1000 and still obtain
91% conversion with 75% ee. Our next catalyst screening
involved the well-known BINAP family. Higher selectivity
(86% ee) was obtained with [Binap-Ru] preformed complex
but with only a 45% conversion with S/C 50 in methanol.
The conversion was successfully increased to 95% by using
a more acidic solvent, trifluoroethanol. Unfortunately, it was
accompanied with a significant loss of selectivity (57% ee).
The best result from this series was using binaphane (L2)
with complete conversion at S/C 100 with reasonable
enantioselectivity (72% ee, entry 2). DUPHOS12 and BPE
are the most widely used family of ligands for asymmetric
hydrogenation of tetrasubstituted dehydroamino acids. There-
fore, it is with no surprise that we observed selectivities of
up to 89% using these ligands.
Table 2. Hydrogenation of (Z)-Alkyl- or
-Aryl-4,4,4-trifluoro-2-formamido-3-methylbut-2-enoatea
entry
catalyst
method
product
convn (%)
ee (%)
Ph-BPE (L3)-catalyzed reaction could be accomplished
with 1 mol % of catalyst. Higher pressure and higher catalytic
amounts seemed to be necessary for complete conversion
with both Me-Duphos (L4) and its analogue SK-P005 (L5)
(entries 3-5). Finally, high enantioselectivity (92% ee) was
obtained using Tangphos (L6) (entry 6),17 a ligand which
holds chirality on both carbon and phosphorus.Another chiral
phosphorus-type ligand was then screened: trichickenfoot-
phos-Rh, TCFP-Rh (L7). It was developed by Hoge and co-
workers18 who reported outstanding results such as high TON
(up to 27000) and nearly perfect enantioselectivity (>98%
ee) on various trisubstituted olefins and a few symmetrical
tetrasubstituted R-dehydroamino acids. We were able to
successfully use the L7 catalyst in the hydrogenation of
substrate 1a giving complete conversion and a very high
selectivity of above 99% ee (entry 7). We then decided to
extend the scope of our work by substituting the ꢀ-methyl
group with other alkyl or aryl groups (Table 2). A consistent
stereochemical induction was observed going from methyl-
substituted alkene 1a to ethyl-substituted akene 1b with
catalyst L7 (>99% ee, Table 2, entry 1).
The introduction of the benzyl group (1c) allowed for study
of steric effects, and once again, not only was the conversion
high but the selectivity was also found to be excellent (99%
ee, Table 2 entry 3). The benzyl and the hexafluoro olefin
(1c and 1h) seem to be very unique as most catalysts tested
apart from L7 gave conversion below 20% with low
selectivity (<20% ee). This was surprising as one can usually
expect to achieve some good conversions and potentially
some good selectivities in at least a couple of other similar
catalysts. We next investigated the impact of steric and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
L7
L3
L7
L3
L7
L7
L3
L7
L3
L7
L3
B
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
2b
2b
2c
2c
2h
2d
2d
2e
2e
2f
100
100
100
0
100
78
100
14
100
65
>99
60
99
N/A
86
50
93
50
91
39
9
10
11
2f
100
90
a Reactions were performed on 1 mmol of substrate at 60 °C with a
substrate concentration of 0.4 M. Method B was performed at 70 psi of H2
with S/C 100 and method C at 250 psi of H2 with S/C 20. Each reaction
was stoppped after 16 h. Enantiomeric excesses were determined via chiral
GC or HPLC as described in the Supporting Information. Key: (a) for olefin
preparation, see the Supporting Information; (b) starting material and product
bearing an acetamide instead of formamide; (c) ethyl ester.
electronic effect using aromatic substituents (1d-f). First,
we demonstrated that the hydrogenation of these substrates
needed to be run with a mimimum of 5 mol % of catalyst
and higher pressure of 250 psi to get full conversion (method
C) in 16 h. Unfortunately, having the aryl directly attached
to the double bond seems to lower the reactivity of the
substrates toward the L7 catalyst. The reactions ranged from
14 to 78% completion within 16 h, with selectivities under
50% ee. The best results were obtained with L3, which gave
around 90% ee on three different substrates (Table 2, entries
7, 9, and 11). Having these results in hand, we concluded
that L7 requires a methylene group to get very high selectivity
and/or conversion (Scheme 2).
(13) (a) Pye, P. J.; Rossen, K.; Reamer, R. A.; Tsou, N. N.; Volante,
R. P.; Reider, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 6207. (b) Rossen, K.; Pye,
P. J.; DiMichele, L. M.; Volante, R. P.; Reider, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 6823.
Scheme 2. Generalized Reaction for Highly Stereoselective
Hydrogenation with [TCFP-Rh] (L7) Catalyst
(14) Boaz, N. W.; Debenham, S. D.; Mackenzie, E. B.; Large, S. E.
Org. Lett. 2002, 2421.
(15) S/C means substrate over catalyst ratio; S/C 20 ) 5 mol % of
catalyst; S/C 100 ) 1 mol % of catalyst.
(16) Sturm, T.; Weissensteiner, W.; Spindler, F. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2003,
345, 160.
(17) Yang, Q.; Shang, G.; Gao, W.; Deng, J.; Zhang, X. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 3832–3835.
(18) (a) Hoge, G.; Wu, H.-P.; Kissel, W. S.; Pflum, D. A.; Green, D. J.;
Bao, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5966. (b) Wu, H.-P.; Hoge, G. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 3645. (c) Gridnev, I. D.; Imamoto, T.; Hoge, G.; Kouchi,
M.; Takahashi, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2560.
2010
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 9, 2010