time.6 On the other hand, sulfonylindoles have been
reported to produce vinylogous imines in situ in the
presence of base,7 which react with various nucleophiles,
such as Grignard reagents,7a Reformatsky reagents,7b
nitroalkanes,7c aldehydes,7d,8a and enamide.8b Recently, we
have focused on the applications of glycine derivatives in
asymmetric catalysis;9 herein we communicate an unprec-
edented Ag-catalyzed asymmetric reaction of glycine deriva-
tives with sulfonylindoles, which offers a general procedure
leading to chiral ꢀ-substituted tryptophans.
Table 1. Screening of the Chiral Ligand for CuClO4-Catalyzed
Reaction of Sulfonylindole 1a with Glycine Ester 2aa
We commenced our study by exposure of sulfonylindole
1a with glycine imine 2a using a catalyst derived from
CuClO4 and various readily available chiral ligands (Table
1). The results revealed that the ligand with different
coordination atom had a great impact on the enantio- and
diastereoselectivity of the reaction. The use of FcPHOX
L1-L510 afforded the corresponding adduct 3aa in high
enantioselectivity (81-90%) and chemical yield but in low
diastereoselectivity (1/1-2/1). The change of electronic
factor of ligands exerted limited effect on both enantio- and
diastereoselectivities, which differs from our early observa-
tion (entries 1-5).9a,b PHOX L611 and Trost’s ligand L712
demonstrated low stereocontrol in the present reaction,
obtaining nearly racemic product (entries 6 and 7). SiocPhox
L8 and L913 developed in our group were also proved to be
unsuitable for the reaction (entries 8 and 9). Finally, we were
pleased to find that diastereoselectivity of the adduct 3aa
was improved greatly by employing commercially available
entry
ligand
yieldb (%)
anti/sync
ee of anti/synd (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
84
86
98
82
88
87
83
81
78
59
85
57/43
64/36
71/29
64/36
36/64
60/40
53/47
62/38
57/48
71/29
83/17
83/83
80/73
90/88
81/-
80/97
18/43
2/14
35/23
37/31
86/35
86/-
(5) (a) Behforouz, M.; Zarrinmayeh, H.; Ogle, M. E.; Riehle, T. J.; Bell,
F. W. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1988, 25, 1627. (b) Boteju, L. W.; Wegner, K.;
Qian, X. H.; Hruby, V. J. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2391. (c) Bruncko, M.;
Crich, D. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4239. (d) Dubois, L.; Mehta, A.; Tourette,
E.; Dodd, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 434. (e) Shapiro, G.; Buechler,
D.; Marzi, M.; Schmidt, K.; Gomezlor, B. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 4978.
(f) Rodriguez, R.; Vinets, I.; Diez, A.; Rubiralta, M.; Giralt, E. Synth.
Commun. 1996, 26, 3029. (g) Damour, D.; Pulicani, J. P.; Vuilhorgne, M.;
Mignani, S. Synlett 1999, 786. (h) Valdez, S. C.; Leighton, J. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14638.
9
10
11
a Molar ratio of 1a/2a/CuClO4/L ) 100/110/10/11, 80 mg of 40 wt %
KF on basic alumina was used as base. b Determined by 1H NMR with
CH3NO2 as the internal standard. c The ratio was determined by 1H NMR.
d Determined by chiral HPLC.
(6) (a) O’Donnell, M. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 506. (b) Na´jera, C.;
Sansano, J. M. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 4584. (c) Hashimoto, T.; Maruoka,
K. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 5656.
(7) (a) Ballini, R.; Palmieri, A.; Petrini, M.; Torregiani, E. Org. Lett.
2006, 8, 4093. (b) Palmieri, A.; Petrini, M. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 1863.
(c) Ballini, R.; Palmieri, A.; Petrini, M.; Shaikh, R. R. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2008, 350, 129. (d) Shaikh, R. R.; Mazzanti, A.; Petrini, M.; Bartoli, G.;
Melchiorre, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8707.
monodentate phosphoramidite ligands L10 and L11;14 the
latter was better in terms of both selectivity and yield (entry
10 vs entry 11).
(8) (a) Li, Y.; Shi, F.-Q.; He, Q.-L.; You, S.-L. Org. Lett. 2009, 11,
3182. (b) Guo, Q.-X.; Peng, Y.-G.; Zhang, J.-W.; Song, L.; Feng, Z.; Gong,
With ligand L11, we set out to optimize reaction condi-
tions, and the results are summarized in Table 2. Examination
of glycine imines 2 led to the bulky tert-butyl esters 2b as
optimal substrates, affording the adduct 3ab in 80% yield
with 85/15 dr, 96% ee (entry 1, Table 2, vs entry 11, Table
1). With tert-butyl esters 2b, the effect of solvent was
evaluated, which revealed that the enantio- and diastereo-
selectivities decreased in THF relative to that in CH2Cl2
(entry 2 vs entry 1). The diastereoselectivity was maintained
in DME, while the enantioselectivity was lower (entry 3).
The yield in toluene increased from 80% to 88% while the
L.-Z. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4620
.
(9) (a) Yan, X.-X.; Peng, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, K.; Hong, W.; Hou,
X.-L.; Wu, Y.-D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1979. (b) Yan, X.-X.;
Peng, Q.; Li, Q.; Zhang, K.; Yao, J.; Hou, X.-L.; Wu, Y.-D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 14362. (c) Chen, C.-G.; Hou, X.-L.; Pu, L. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 2073. (d) Li, Q.; Ding, C.-H.; Hou, X.-L.; Dai, L.-X. Org. Lett. 2010,
12, 1080.
(10) (a) Sammakia, T.; Latham, H. A.; Schaad, D. R. J. Org. Chem.
1995, 60, 10. (b) Richards, C. J.; Damalidis, T.; Hibbs, D. E.; Hursthouse,
M. B. Synlett 1995, 74. (c) Nishibayashi, Y.; Uemura, S. Synlett 1995,
79.
(11) (a) Helmchen, G.; Pfaltz, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 336. (b)
Roseblade, S. J.; Pfaltz, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 1402.
(12) (a) Trost, B. M.; Van Vranken, D. L.; Bingel, C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 9327. (b) Trost, B. M.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 4545. (c) Trost, B. M.; Machacek, M. R.; Aponick, A. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 747.
(14) (a) Feringa, B. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 346. (b) ComprehensiVe
Asymmetric Catalysis; Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.;
Springer: Heidelberg, 2004; Vols. 1-3. (c) Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L.;
Lefort, L.; de Vries, J. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 2007, 40, 1267.
(13) (a) You, S. L.; Zhu, X. Z.; Luo, Y. M.; Hou, X. L.; Dai, L. X.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 7471. (b) Hou, X.-L.; Sun, N. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 4399. Correction: Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1435.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 8, 2010
1689