fully used to synthesize chiral phosphine oxides employing
diaryl phosphine oxides. However, less reactive dialkyl
phosphine oxides, in comparison with diaryl phosphine
oxides, are still challenging for chemists and no report has
been presented yet. Herein, we report for the first time the
application of dialkyl phosphine oxides in catalytic asym-
metric reactions.
Table 1. Optimization of the Phospha-Michael Reaction
It is commonly accepted that secondary phosphine oxides
undergo phosphine oxide-phosphinous acid (R2POH) tau-
tomerism with the phosphinous acid tautomer as the nucleo-
philic form and the phosphine oxide tautomer as the almost
exclusively favored but non-nucleophilic form under neutral
conditions (eg, R ) Et, eq 1).6 Thus, the activation of
phosphine oxide employing an appropriate base is expected
to be an effective approach to activate the nucleophile since
the equilibrium could shift toward the reactive phosphinous
acid form under such conditions. In connection with our
previous work on zinc catalyzed phospha-Michael reactions
of dialkyl phosphite,7 we chose Et2Zn as a base to investigate
the hydrophosphinylation reaction of dialkyl phosphine
oxides.
entrya
additive (mol %)
none
none
none
none
none
4 Å MS (100 mg)
iPrOH (20)
p-cresol (20)
PhCOOH (20)
ZnCl2 (20)
AlCl3 (20)
Ph3PO (20)
Ph3PS (20)
solvent
yield (%)b
ee (%)c
1
2
3
toluene
THF
ether
95
71
90
90
99
83
84
trace
5
n.r.
n.r.
84
83
83
59
91
85
99
99
95
99
68
60
67
33
94
64
60
n.d.
70
-
4
hexane
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
5d
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15e
16
17
18
19
20
21f
-
68
68
62
64
60
86
93
94
95
97
Et3N (20)
NMI (20)
The preliminary study indicated that diethyl phosphine
oxide underwent deprotonation in the presence of Et2Zn with
liberation of 1 equiv of ethane (eq 1). Intrigued by this
phenomenon, we tried to monitor this process using 31P
NMR. When diethyl phosphine oxide was mixed with Et2Zn
(1 equiv) in toluene, the original signal at 40.3 ppm
underwent a significant downfield shift to 103.1 ppm, which
indicated the formation of the corresponding zincate.8 This
intermediate is highly nucleophilic and it undergoes addition
to R,ꢀ-unsaturated N-acylpyrrolessan equivalence of Wein-
reb amide.9
2,2′-bipyridine (20)
pyridine (20)
pyridine (1 equiv)
pyridine (5 equiv)
pyridine (10 equiv)
pyridine (10 equiv)
a All reactions were carried out with 1a (0.375 mmol, 1.5 equiv), L3/
Et2Zn (20 mol %) and 2a (0.25 mmol) in 2.5 mL solvent at rt for 12 h.
b Yield of isolated product. c The enantiomeric excess was determined by
HPLC analysis. d One equivalent of L3/Et2Zn was employed. e NMI )
N-methyl-imidazol. f Reaction was carried out with L3/Me2Zn and 4.0 mL
toluene at rt for 12 h.
Encouraged by this finding, we envisioned the catalytic
version. The preliminary study indicated (S,S)-ProPhenol
L310 was the best ligand among the ligands investigated
(95%, 68% ee). The following examination of solvents
suggested toluene was the best solvent with respect to
enantioselectivity. In order to test the chiral inducing ability
of the catalyst, 1 equiv L3/Et2Zn was employed. We were
pleased to find the enantioselectivity increased remarkably
to 94% ee (Table 1, entry 5). On the basis of the result, we
speculated that the product formed in the reaction may have
a negative feedback to the catalyst and thereby affected the
enantioselectivity. So an additional reagent might be required
in the reaction to prevent the unfavorable binding of the
product to the catalyst. After careful screening of a series of
additives,11 including molecular sieves, alcohols, carboxylic
(5) (a) Yamakoshi, K.; Harwood, S. J.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2565–2568. (b) Fu, X.; Loh, W.-T.; Zhang,
Y.; Chen, T.; Ma, T.; Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Tan, C.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 7387–7390. (c) Leow, D.; Lin, S.; Chittimalla, S.; Fu, X.; Tan,
C.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5641–5645. (d) Fu, X.; Jiang, Z.;
Tan, C.-H. Chem. Commun. 2007, 5058–5060.
(6) (a) Chatt, J.; Heaton, B. T. J. Chem. Soc. A 1968, 2745–2757. (b)
Ivanova, N. I.; Gusarova, N. K.; Nikitina, E. A.; Albanov, A. I.;
Sinegovskaya, L. M.; Nikitin, M. V.; Konovalova, N. A.; Trofimov, B. A.
Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2004, 179, 7–18.
(7) (a) Zhao, D.; Yuan, Y.; Chan, A. S. C.; Wang, R. Chem.sEur. J.
2009, 15, 2738–2741. (b) Zhao, D.; Wang, Y.; Mao, L.; Wang, R.
Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15, 10983–10987.
(10) For recent examples of the bis-ProPhenol in asymmetric catalysis:
(a) Trost, B. M.; Malhotra, S.; Fried, B. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
1674–1675. (b) Trost, B. M.; Hitce, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4572–
4573. (c) Trost, B. M.; Malhotra, S.; Mino, T.; Rajapaksa, N. S. Chem.sEur.
J. 2008, 14, 7648–7657. (d) Trost, B. M.; Muller, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 2438–2439. (e) Trost, B. M.; Shin, S. H.; Sclafani, J. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8602–8603. (f) Trost, B. M.; Jaratjaroonphong, J.;
Reutrakul, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2778–2779. (g) Trost, B. M.;
Weiss, A. H.; von Wangelin, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8–9. (h)
Trost, B. M.; Lupton, D. W. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2023–2026. See also ref 7.
(8) For details, see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information.
(9) (a) Kinoshita, T.; Okada, S.; Park, S.-R.; Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4680–4684. (b) Mita, T.; Sasaki, K.;
Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 514–515. (c)
Yamagiwa, N.; Qin, H.; Matsunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 13419–13427. (d) Evans, D. A.; Borg, G.; Scheidt, K. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3188–3191.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 8, 2010
1881