Hansen et al.
JOCArticle
the electrode surface with a diameter of 2 mm and a well wall
stirred overnight at rt and the organic solvent evaporated in
vacuo. The aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (3 ꢀ 15 mL)
and washed with brine and the product purified by flash
chromatography (CH2Cl2/EtOAc 2:1) as white crystals (1.44
g, 5.66 mmol, 77%): 1H NMR (CH3OD) δ (ppm) 7.31 (m, 5H),
6.94 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.66 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.04 (s, 2H), 3.25
(t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.64 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (CH3OD) δ
(ppm) 158.7, 146.7, 138.4, 130.4, 130.1, 129.4, 128.9, 128.7,
116.9, 67.2, 43.8, 36.3; ESI-TOF high-acc (m/z) calcd for
C16H18N2O2 ([M þ Na]þ) 293.1266, found 293.1264; mp
81.1-81.5 °C.
height of 1.6 mm.35
The electrolyte was an aqueous 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH
7.0, containing 0.15 M NaCl (PBS). The reproducibility of the
measurements was verified with at least three equivalently
prepared electrodes. All nucleotides were synthesized by stan-
dard automated oligonucleotide synthesis by DNA Technology
A/S (Risskov, Denmark). Millipore water (18.2 MΩ) was used
throughout the work.
DNA Sequences. Grafting of DNA to gold and GC electrodes
and hybridization: 50-TGG TAC GTTA-(CH2)6-NH2-30 (TzFc
modified) and 50-TAA CGT ACC A-30 (cDNA).
Benzyl 4-(3,3-Dimethyltriaz-1-enyl)phenethylcarbamate (6).
Benzyl 4-aminophenethylcarbamate (2.06 g, 8.09 mmol) was
dissolved in THF (17 mL), H2O (12 mL), MeCN (8.5 mL), and
concd HCl (4.1 mL) and cooled to 0 °C. A solution of sodium
nitrite (0.74 g, 10.76 mmol) in THF (2.5 mL) and H2O (2.5 mL)
was added slowly. The mixture was then added dropwise to a
40% aqueous solution of dimethylamine (22 mL) under vigor-
ous stirring and immediately extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 ꢀ 15 mL).
The combined organic phases were washed with H2O and dried
over Na2SO4, and the product was purified by flash chromato-
graphy (EtOAc/CH2Cl2 1:24) as light yellow crystals (2.22 g,
6.82 mmol, 84%): 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.35 (m, 7H), 7.14
(d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.10 (s, 2H), 4.81 (bs, 1H), 3.45 (t,
J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 3.33 (bs, 6H), 2.80 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H); 13C
NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm) 156.4, 149.7, 136.7, 135.8, 129.6, 128.6,
128.1, 120.8, 66.7, 42.3, 35.7; ESI-TOF high-acc (m/z) calcd
for C18H22N4O2 ([M þ Na]þ) 349.1640, found 349.1639; mp
56.8-57.4 °C.
Grafting of DNA to GC, hybridization with MB-labeled
DNA and strand exchange: 50-H2N-(CH2)6-TAC GTG AAC
CTA CTG-30 (TzFc modified), 50-TCA GCA TCA GTA GGT
TCA CGT A-(CH2)6-NH2-30 (MB modified), and 50-TAC GTG
AAC CTA CTG ATG CTG A-30 (cDNA).
Methyl Ferrocenecarboxylate (2). To ferrocenecarboxylic
acid (4.00 g, 17.4 mmol) in MeOH (120 mL) was added
BF3 Et2O (12.3 mL) and the mixture refluxed overnight. A
3
5% NaHCO3 solution was added to adjust to pH 8, and the
reaction mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 ꢀ 50 mL). The
organic phases were washed with brine and dried over MgSO4.
The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to yield dark orange
crystals (4.12 g, 16.96 mol, 98%). Analytical data were in
accordance with literature data:27 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm)
188.9, 172.3, 71.4, 71.1, 70.2, 69.8, 51.7; ESI-TOF high-acc
(m/z) calcd for C12H12FeO2 MS ([M þ Na]þ) 267.0084, found
267.0084.
Methoxycarbonyl-1-ferrocenesuccinic Acid (3). Methyl ferro-
cenecarboxylate 2 (4.12 g, 16.96 mmol) and succinic anhydride
(3.70 g, 36.93 mmol) dissolved in CH2Cl2 (28 mL) were added
dropwise to a solution of AlCl3 (10.61 g, 79.58 mmol) in CH2Cl2
(28 mL). The reaction was stirred for 2 h at rt and poured onto
ice (150 mL), and the organic phase was removed. The aqueous
layer was acidified with concd HCl, and orange crystals were
collected by filtration (2.28 g, 6.64 mmol, 40%). Analytical data
were in accordance with literature data:27 1H NMR (CH3OD) δ
(ppm) 4.91 (s, 4H), 4.87 (t, J=1.8 Hz, 4H), 4.60 (t, J=1.8 Hz,
2H), 4.57 (t, J=1.8 Hz, 2H), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.09 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 2H),
2.65 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (CH3OD) δ (ppm) 204.3,
176.5, 172.7, 80.9, 74.9, 74.3, 74.0, 72.8, 71.8, 52.3, 35.5, 28.5;
ESI-TOF high-acc (m/z) calcd for C16H16FeO5 ([M þ Na]þ)
367.0245, found 367.0255.
10-Methoxycarbonyl-1-ferrocenebutyric Acid (4). To a stirred
mixture of zinc dust (3 g, 45.9 mmol) and HgCl2 (0.25 g, 0.92
mmol) was added H2O followed by concd HCl (0.2 mL) which
was added dropwise. The solution was stirred for 10 min at rt
before it was filtered and the precipitate (Zn-Hg) washed
carefully with MeOH.
[4-(2-Aminoethyl)phenyl](3,3-dimethyl)triazene (7). Com-
pound 6 (807 mg, 2.47 mmol) was dissolved in MeOH (10 mL)
and 10% Pd/C (81 mg) was added. The suspension was stirred 1 h
under hydrogen (1 atm) at rt and filtered through Celite and the
solvent evaporated in vacuo to give the product as an orange oil
(452 mg, 2.35 mmol, 95%): 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.35 (d,
J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.15 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 3.31 (bs, 6H) 2.94 (t,
J=6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.64 (t, J=6.8 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ
(ppm) 150.7, 138.0, 130.2, 121.5, 44.2, 39.7; ESI-TOF high-acc
(m/z) calcd for C10H16N4 ([M þ H]þ) 193.1453, found 193.1457.
Methyl 10-[N-(4-(3,3-Dimethyltriaz-1-enyl)phenethyl)butyl-
amide]ferrocene-1-carboxylate (8). 10-Methoxycarbonyl-1-fer-
rocenesuccinate (236 mg, 0.71 mmol) and 7 (137 mg, 0.71 mmol)
were suspended in dry DMF (7.5 mL) and Et3N (0.8 mL).
HBTU (271 mg, 0.71 mmol) was added and the mixture stirred
for 100 min at rt. After addition of H2O, the solution was
extracted with EtOAc (3 ꢀ 20 mL). The product was purified
by flash chromatography (EtOAc/CH2Cl2 1:2) as an orange oil
(318 mg, 0.63 mmol, 89%): 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.37 (d,
J=8.4 Hz, 2H) 7.15 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 5.49 (bs, 1H), 4.70 (s, 2H),
4.33 (s, 2H), 4.07 (s, 2H), 4.04 (s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 3.51 (q,
J=6.6 Hz. 2H), 3.33 (bs, 6H), 2.80 (t, J=6.6 Hz, 2H), 2.25 (t, J=
The Zn-Hg (2.4 g) was added in small portions to a stirred
solution of 3 (0.5 g, 1.45 mmol) in AcOH (6.5 mL) and concd
HCl (9.9 mL) over a period of 20 min. The slurry was stirred for
1 h at rt, H2O (100 mL) was added, and the remaining Zn-Hg
was removed by filtration. The solution was extracted with
CH2Cl2 (3 ꢀ 50 mL) and washed, and the combined organic
phases were washed with brine and evaporated in vacuo to yield
an orange oil (466 mg, 1.41 mmol, 97%). Known compound:27
1H NMR (CH3OD) δ (ppm) 4.72 (t, J=2.0 Hz, 2H), 4.43 (t, J=
2.0 Hz, 2H), 4.12 (s, 4H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 2.31 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H),
2.29 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H) 1.76 (k, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR
(CH3OD) δ (ppm) 177.2, 174.1, 91.2, 73.2, 72.4, 71.7, 70.9, 70.2,
52.1, 34.4, 28.8, 27.3; ESI-TOF high-acc (m/z) calcd for
C16H18FeO4 ([M þ Na]þ) 353.0452, found 353.0463.
7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.10 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.77 (k, J=7.6 Hz, 2H); 13
C
NMR (CDCl3) δ (ppm) 172.7, 172.1, 149.7, 135.9, 129.3, 120.8,
89.9, 71.9, 70.7, 69.8, 69.1, 51.6, 40.6, 36.3, 35.2, 28.0, 26.8;
ESI-TOF high-acc (m/z) calcd for C26H32FeN4O3 ([M þ Na]þ)
527.1722, found 527.1722.
10-[N-(4-(3,3-Dimethyltriaz-1-enyl)phenethyl)butylamide]-
ferrocene-1-carboxylic Acid (9). LiOH (90 mg, 3.76 mmol) was
added to a solution of 8 (77 mg, 0.15 mmol) in THF (6 mL) and
water (0.5 mL). The mixture was refluxed for 96 h before the
THF was evaporated in vacuo. AcOH (20%) was added drop-
wise until the product precipitated (pH 6-7), and the aqueous
solution was extracted with EtOAc (3 ꢀ 10 mL) and washed with
brine. The product was immediately purified by flash chroma-
tography (EtOAc f EtOAc/MeOH 1:1) as an unstable orange
oil (61 mg, 0.12 mmol, 82%). It was not possible to obtain pure
spectroscopic data, and the compound should be used immedi-
ately in the proceeding reaction step due to degradation.
Benzyl 4-Aminophenethylcarbamate (5). To a solution of 4-(2-
aminoethyl)aniline (1 g, 7.34 mmol) in THF (30 mL) and NaOH
(1 M, 7.3 mL) was added benzyl chloroformate (1.03 mL, 7.35
mmol) in THF (10 mL) dropwise at 0 °C. The solution was
2480 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 8, 2010