afforded a lower yield of the major product, due in part to
the formation of more side products, while providing only
modest ee. We then turned our attention to the effect of
different substituents on the phenyl ring of the benzoyl group.
As shown in Table 1, introduction of a methoxy or methyl
group in the ortho or meta positions of the phenyl ring did
not induce a positive effect (entries 11 and 12). However,
to our delight, the same substituent groups in the para
position gave significant improvement on yield and ee
(entries 13 and 14; 83 and 85% ee, respectively). In addition,
the catalyst loading could be decreased to 2 mol %, providing
an even higher yield (98%) without compromising the
enantioselectivity (entry 15). Furthermore, a N,N-dimethy-
lamino-substituted N-acyl imine substrate provided the
highest enantioselectivity, up to 89% (entry 17), presumably
due to increased steric hindrance at the para position. The
N,N-dimethylamino-substituted N-acyl group has been re-
moved, as demonstrated by Terada et al.8
Once the optimized conditions were established, the
substrate scope of the asymmetric addition of DHP to N-acyl
imine derivatives was studied. This reaction is tolerant of a
variety of N-acyl imines (1a-1h). For example, the addition
of imines bearing electron-withdrawing groups (p-chloro, 1b,
entry 2; p-bromo, 1c, entry 3) gave very high yield and
excellent enantioselectivity, up to 90%. An example of an
N-acyl imine with an electron-donating group, such as para-
methyl, also allowed for a good yield and 90% ee (entry 5).
However, a strong electron-donating substituent had a
negative effect on the ee (78% ee, entry 6). Additionally,
the imines with methoxy (76% ee, entry 6) and fluoro (91%
ee, entry 7) substituents on the meta position provided similar
results in comparison to their para counterparts. We were
pleased to find the reaction general for various DHP
derivatives.
Scheme 1
.
DHP Addition to Imine Resulting in a
Mannich-Type Product
the first catalytic asymmetric addition of DHP derivatives
to N-acyl imines, together with interesting examples of the
potential synthetic utilization of this reaction.
We initiated our studies with VAPOL phosphoric acid3a
(5 mol % catalyst loading) as the catalyst and toluene as the
solvent. The reaction was run at room temperature and
yielded the addition product in 45% yield and 37% ee. This
result encouraged us to further explore the reaction condi-
tions. Catalyst screening showed that (R)-TRIP-PA7 gave
the best result in terms of enantioselectivity and yield.
Therefore, (R)-TRIP-PA was used to evaluate the effect of
solvent on the reaction. As shown in Table 1, coordinating
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditions
As shown in Table 2, the reaction of DHP derivative 2b,
bearing an n-propyl group, afforded up to 92% yield and
PA, temp, time, yield,
b
entrya
R
solvent mol % °C
h
%
ee, %c
(2) (a) Uraguchi, D.; Terada, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5356.
(b) Uraguchi, D.; Sorimachi, K.; Terada, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
11804. (c) Uraguchi, D.; Sorimachi, K.; Terada, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 9360. (d) Rueping, M.; Sugiono, E.; Theissmann, T.; Kuenkel, A.;
Kockritz, A.; Davtyan, A. P.; Nemati, N.; Beller, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
1065. (e) Zeng, X.; Zeng, X.; Xu, Z.; Lu, M.; Zhong, G. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 3036.
1
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
toluene
DCM
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
1
2
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
-20
50
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
rt
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
24
48
18
26
21
21
21
24
24
24
61
64
nd
24
nd
48
79
85
<10
31
80
73
90
82
98
78
76
64
33
na
54
na
28
60
71
40
64
72
72
83
85
85
81
89
2
3
THF
4
EtOAc
ether
DCE
hexane
CHCl3
CHCl3
CHCl3
5
6
(3) (a) Rowland, G. B.; Zhang, H.; Rowland, E. B.; Chennamadhavuni,
S.; Wang, Y.; Antilla, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15696. (b) Liang,
Y.; Rowland, E. B.; Rowland, G. B.; Perman, J. A.; Antilla, J. C. Chem.
Commun. 2007, 4477. (c) Rowland, E. B.; Rowland, G. B.; Liang, Y.;
Perman, J. A.; Antilla, J. C. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2609. (d) Li, G.; Rowland,
E. B.; Rowland, G. B.; Antilla, J. C. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4065. (e) Rowland,
E. B.; Rowland, G. B.; Rivera-Otero, E.; Antilla, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 12084. (f) Li, G.; Fronczek, F. R.; Antilla, J. C. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 12216.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
3,5-MeOC6H3 CHCl3
2-MeC6H4
CHCl3
CHCl3
CHCl3
CHCl3
CHCl3
4-MeC6H4
4-MeOC6H4
4-MeOC6H4
4-MeOC6H4
(4) (a) Gizecki, P.; Dhal, R.; Toupet, L.; Dujardin, G. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 585. (b) Akiyama, T.; Morita, H.; Fuchibe, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 13070. (c) Liu, H.; Cun, L. F.; Mi, A. Q.; Jiang, Y. Z.; Gong, L. Z.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 6023. Rueping, M.; Azap, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 7832. (d) Liu, H.; Dagousset, G.; Masson, G.; Retailleau, P.;
Zhu, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4598.
4-Me2NC6H4 CHCl3
a Molar ratio of 1/2 ) 1.0/1.0 equiv. b With 4 Å MS added in entries
8 and 11-17. c Isolated yields. d Enantiomeric excess determined by chiral
HPLC.
(5) Cakir, S. P.; Mead, K. T. Synthesis 2008, 871.
(6) (a) Faulkner, D. J. Nat. Prod. Rep. 1998, 15, 113. (b) Clarke, P. A.;
Santos, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 2045. (c) Franke, P. T.; Richter, B.;
Jørgensen, K. A. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 6317.
solvents such as THF and ether (entries 3 and 5) gave poor
results. Chloroform provided the best yield at 85% and 71%
ee (entry 8).
Decreasing the temperature lowered the yield and ee
dramatically (entry 9). Increasing the temperature to 50 °C
(7) TRIP-PA was first prepared and used by List et al. See: Hoffmann,
S.; Seayad, A.; List, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7424.
(8) It has been shown that the N,N-dimethylamino N-acyl protecting
group can be removed in a two-step reaction sequence. Please see: Uraguchi,
D.; Sorimachi, K.; Terada, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9360.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 9, 2010
1961