with cyclization reactions. Herein we present the first
intermolecular radical aminations onto imines by using
N-trimethylstannylated benzophenone imine 3 as a novel
radical acceptor (Scheme 1).
experiments were conducted in sealed tubes. With R,R′-
azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) as an initiator, the reaction did
not work (entries 1 and 2). With 1,1′-azobis(cyclohexane-
1-carbonitrile) (V-40) as an alternative azo initiator product
formation was not observed (entry 6). Pleasingly, with di-
tert-butyl hypodinitrite14 at 60 °C in benzene, imine 5 was
obtained, clearly showing that our new approach for inter-
molecular radical amination is working. However, the
product was isolated in a moderate 24% yield (entry 3). A
similar result was achieved in n-heptane (entry 4) and
Scheme 1. Radical Amination with 3
15
initiation with Et3B/O2 afforded 5 in a lower yield (entry
5). Benzoyl and lauroyl peroxide turned out to be less
efficient initiators for our radical amination (entries 7 and
8). Di-tert-butyl peroxide (DTBP) as initiator in benzene gave
5 in 15% yield (entry 9). We assumed that radical addition to
benzene might occur as a side reaction that would lead to chain
termination. Indeed, in tert-butylbenzene, which is less prone
to undergo homolytic aromatic substitution, yield could be
improved to 38% (entry 10). Along this line, yield was further
improved in n-heptane under otherwise identical conditions
(61%, entry 11).16 The radical nature of the process was
supported by running the amination in the absence of any
initiator. As expected for a radical process, no product was
identified by GC analysis under these conditions (entry 12).
This experiment clearly showed that 5 was not formed via a
SN2-type process. Lowering the amount of 3 from 1.5 to 1.25
equiv led to a decrease in yield, whereas increasing reagent
loading to 1.75 did not significantly change reaction outcome
and with 2 equiv of 3 the best result was achieved (entries
13-15). Di-tert-butyl peroxide (0.25 equiv) turned out to be
the ideal initiator loading since lowering the peroxide amount
led to a decrease in yield (entries 16-18).17
We next studied the scope and limitations of the
amination reaction applying the optimized conditions (di-
tert-butyl peroxide (0.25 equiv) in n-heptane in a sealed
tube at 140 °C oil bath temperature and 2 equiv of 3).
For some derivatives we observed partial decomposition
of the product imines of type 5 during SiO2 chromatog-
raphy. In those cases, the crude imine was reduced with
NaBH4 in MeOH to give the corresponding bulky second-
ary amines of type 6, which were readily isolated by
Recently, we reported on radical phosphanylations with
stannylated phosphine 1.11 C-Radical addition to the P-atom
of 1 turned out to be very fast. The adduct radical then
liberates the trimethyltin radical which is able to propagate
the chain. This process corresponds to a formal homolytic
substitution at phosphorus. Based on these results, we decided
to test homolytic substitution at the trimethylstannylated
amine 2.12 Unfortunately, all amination attempts with 2 by
using various C-radicals under different conditions failed.
We therefore decided to approach the intermolecular
radical amination by an addition/elimination sequence with
an imine as a radical acceptor. In order to get regiose-
lective N-addition, phenyl groups were installed at the
imine functionality (see 3). Addition of a C-radical to 3
should generate adduct radical 4 which will then eliminate
the chain propagating trimethyltin radical to provide the
targeted imine 5.
The known amination reagent 3 was readily prepared by
reaction of benzonitrile with commercially available Ph-Li
and subsequent treatment with Me3SnCl in Et2O (see the
Supporting Information).13 Imine 3, which was purified by
distillation, could be stored under argon in the refrigerator
for months.
As a test reaction we studied amination of cyclohexyl
iodide with 3 under different conditions (Table 1). All
(14) Mendelhall, G. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 451.
(15) Miura, K.; Ichinose, Y.; Nozaki, K.; Fugami, K.; Oshima, K.;
Utimoto, K. Bull. Soc. Chem. Jpn. 1989, 62, 143.
(10) Han, O.; Frey, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8982. Takanao,
S.; Suzuki, M.; Kijima, A.; Ogasawara, K. Chem. Lett. 1990, 315.
Tomaszewski, M. T.; Warkentin, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 2123.
Tomaszewski, M. T.; Warkentin, J. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993,
11, 966. Takano, S.; Suzuki, M.; Ogasawara, K. Heterocycles 1994, 37,
149. Bowman, R. W.; Stephenson, P. T.; Terret, N. K.; Young, A. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 6369. Bowman, R. W.; Stephenson, P. T.; Terret,
N. K.; Young, A. R. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 7959. Gioanola, M.; Leardini,
R.; Nanni, D.; Pareschi, P.; Zanardi, G. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 2039.
McClure, C. K.; Kiessling, A. J.; Link, J. S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 7121.
Ryu, I.; Matsu, K.; Minakata, S.; Komatsu, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998,
120, 5838. Depature, M.; Diewok, J.; Grimaldi, J.; Hatem, J. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 275. Johnston, J. N.; Plotkin, M. A.; Viswanathan, R.;
Prabhakaran, E. N. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1009. Viswanathan, R.; Prabhakaran,
E. N.; Plotkin, M. A.; Johnston, J. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 163.
Tojino, M.; Otsuka, N.; Fukuyama, T.; Matsubara, H.; Ryu, I. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 7712.
(16) As side products, protected amines derived from amination of
heptane were identified. Alkoxyl radicals abstract H-atoms from n-heptane
under the applied conditions. All possible regioisomeric n-heptane amination
products were identified by GC analysis.
(17) Further increase of the di-tert-butyl concentration (>0.2 equiv)
provided larger amounts of heptane amination side products.
(18) For conversion of imines to free amines, see: Sampson, P. B.;
Honek, J. F. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1395. Ooi, T.; Takeuchi, M.; Kato, D.;
Uematsu, Y.; Tayama, E.; Sakai, D.; Maruoka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 5073.
(19) Jereb, M.; Zupan, M.; Stavber, S. Green. Chem. 2005, 7, 100.
(20) Hackmann, C.; Scha¨fer, H. J. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 4559.
(21) Review: Fensterbank, L.; Malacria, M.; Sieburth, S. M. Synthesis
1997, 813. See also: Studer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 31, 462. Studer,
A.; Steen, H. Chem.sEur. J. 1999, 5, 759.
(11) Vaillard, S. E.; Mu¨ck-Lichtenfeld, C.; Grimme, S.; Studer, A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6533.
(22) CCDC 760806 contains the supplementary crystallographic data
m.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html [or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data
Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: (int.) +44(1223)336-
033, E-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk].
(12) For a formal homolytic substitution at N, see: Uenoyama, Y.;
Fukuyama, T.; Ryu, I. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 935.
(13) Chan, L. H.; Rochow, E. G. J. Organomet. Chem. 1967, 9, 231.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 9, 2010
2073