diphenylketene proved a successful substrate (entry 14).14
In general, aromatic aldehydes, particularly those pos-
sessing electron-withdrawing aromatic substituents (NO2
or Cl), gave very good levels of diastereoselectivity and
enantioselectivity (e.g., entries 2, 3, 12, and 13). Less
activated aromatic aldehydes such as benzaldehyde also
functioned well with good diastereoselectivity and with
slightly lower enantioselectivity being obtained (entry 1).
It was especially noteworthy that the method could be
extended to some unactivated aliphatic aldehydes (entries
5 and 6) with excellent levels of asymmetric induction
(>90%) being displayed.6,15 Poor diastereoselectivity was
observed in some cases (Table 2, entries 7 and 10), and this
is presumably due to competing reaction mechanisms (see
Scheme 2, mechanism A vs mechanism B).
Scheme 2. Postulated Mechanisms A and B for
Phosphine-Catalyzed Formal [2 + 2] Cycloaddition of
Ketoketenes and Aldehydes
The potential synthetic utility of highly substituted ꢀ-lac-
tones 3 can be estimated from the relative ease with which
they may be converted to useful synthons such as ꢀ-hydroxy
carboxylic acids 4 and ꢀ-azido carboxylic acids 5 (Scheme
1).16 Although 3b was obtained in lower ee than many
NAPHANE system, phosphonium alkoxide 6 would add to
another molecule of ketoketene 1 to generate enolate 7.
Intramolecular SN2 (4-exo-tet) would provide trans-3 as the
major product.
Although the more commonly encountered mechanism B
cannot be ruled out at this point, tentative support for
mechanism A was derived from a number of observations.
The sense of enantioselectivity in the (R)-BINAPHANE-
catalyzed dimerization of methylphenylketene (31% ee, (S)-
enantiomer ) major, see the Supporting Information for
procedure), a process that is presumed to involve phospho-
Scheme 1. Ring-Opening Reactions of ꢀ-Lactones 3
(4) (a) Wynberg, H.; Staring, E. G. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104,
166–168. (b) Wynberg, H.; Staring, E. G. J. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50, 1977–
1979. (c) Wynberg, H. Top. Stereochem. 1986, 16, 87–130.
(5) (a) Tennyson, R.; Romo, D. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 7248–7252.
(b) Cortez, G. S.; Tennyson, R. L.; Romo, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 7945–7946.
(6) Zhu, C.; Shen, X.; Nelson, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5352–
5353.
(7) Calter, M. A.; Tretyak, O. A.; Flaschenriem, C. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
1809–1812.
(8) Wilson, J. E.; Fu, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6358–
6360.
(9) He, L.; Lv, H.; Zhang, Y.-R.; Ye, S. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8101–
8103.
(10) (a) Methot, J. L.; Roush, W. R. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1035–
1050. (b) Wei, Y.; Sastry, G. N.; Zipse, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
3473–3477.
examples in Table 2, it served as an effective representative
example to evaluate retention of chirality during KOH-
promoted hydrolysis. Efficient transfer of chirality was noted
both for the conversion of 3b (79% ee) to ꢀ-hydroxy
carboxylic acid 4b (79% ee) and for the conversion of 3c
(90% ee) to ꢀ-azido carboxylic acid 5c (90% ee). No erosion
of diastereomeric purity was detected in either case.
We speculate that the mechanism for formation of trans-3
involves initial attack of BINAPHANE on aldehyde 2 to give
phosphonium alkoxide 6 (Scheme 2).17 Indeed, there is
precedence for such a mode of addition in the work of Fu’s
group on the synthesis of trans-ꢀ-lactams from ketoketenes
and N-triflyl imines. They provided both 1H NMR and X-ray
crystallographic evidence that the nucleophilic catalyst, a
chiral 4-(pyrrolidino)pyridine derivative, adds first to the
N-triflylimine rather than to the ketoketene.18 In the BI-
(11) (a) Kerrigan, N. J.; Ibrahim, A. A.; Harzmann, G. D. Abstracts of
Papers, 236th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society,
Philadelphia, PA; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2008;
ORGN 531. (b) Ibrahim, A. A.; Harzmann, G. D.; Kerrigan, N. J. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 74, 1777–1780. (c) Ibrahim, A. A.; Smith, S. M.; Henson, S.;
Kerrigan, N. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 6919–6922.
(12) (a) Vedejs, E.; Daugulis, O.; MacKay, J. A.; Rozners, E. Synlett
2001, 1499–1505. (b) Wurz, R. P.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
12234–12235. (c) Wilson, J. E.; Fu, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 1426–1429.
(13) The relative stereochemistry of ꢀ-lactones 3 was determined to be
trans through X-ray crystallographic analysis of (()-3d. See the Supporting
Information for further details.
(14) The absolute configuration of 3n (entry 14, Table 2) was determined
to be (R) through X-ray crystallographic analysis (see the Supporting
Information for further details). The absolute configuration of ꢀ-lactones
3a-m was assigned to be (R,R) by analogy.
(15) Aliphatic aldehydes possessing R-branching, such as isobu-
tyraldehyde, were also investigated but gave lower yields (<40%).
(16) Nelson, S. G.; Spencer, K. L.; Cheung, W. S.; Mamie, S. J.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7081–7091.
(3) (a) Paull, D. H.; Weatherwax, A.; Lectka, T. Tetrahedron 2009, 65,
6771–6803. (b) Orr, R. K.; Calter, M. A. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 3545–
3565. (c) Schneider, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 744–746. (d)
Yang, H. W.; Romo, D. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 6403–6434.
(17) Precedent for the addition of phosphines to aldehydes: Lee, S. W.;
Trogler, W. C. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 2644–2648.
(18) Lee, E. C.; Hodous, B. L.; Bergin, E.; Shih, C.; Fu, G. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11586–11587.
1666
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 8, 2010