1884
F.-F. Zhang et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 1881–1884
doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q), broad (br) and multiplet (m). All the solvents
used were analytical grade only. The mass spectra were recorded on FINIGAN
TRACE GC/MS and HRMS.
1-H), 8.16 (s, 1H, carbazole 4-H), 8.18 (s, 1H, carbazole 5-H), 9.23 (s, 1H,
triazole 3-H) ppm; MS(m/z): 497 [MꢁCl]+; HRMS (TOF) calcd for C29H24Cl3N4
[M+H]+, 533.1067; found, 533.1068.
Synthesis of 9-(4-(-imidazol-1-yl)butyl)-9H-carbazole (2b): To a 100 ml round
flask, 9-(4-bromobutyl)-9H-carbazole (1.76 g, 6 mmol), imidazole (0.49 g,
7 mmol) NaH (0.2 g, 8 mmol) and THF (10 mL) solution were added. The
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h under a stream of nitrogen.
After the reaction came to the end (monitored by TLC, eluent, chloroform/
methanol, 10/1, V/V), THF was removed by a rotary evaporator and then the
mixture was cooled. Water (30 mL) was added. The resulting solution was
extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 ꢂ 30 mL). All the combined CH2Cl2 solutions were
dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and then evaporated under reduced pressure.
The residue was purified via silica gel column chromatography (chloroform/
methanol, 10/1, V/V) to give compound 2b (1.43 g) as white solid. Yield 84.9%;
Synthesis of 1,4-bis((9H-carbazol-9-yl)methyl) benzene (5a): To a 100 ml round
flask, carbazole (2.17 g, 8 mmol), 1,4-bis(bromomethyl)benzene (1.08 g,
4 mmol), NaH (0.24 g, 10 mmol) and THF (10 mL) solution were added. The
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h under a stream of nitrogen.
After the reaction came to the end (monitored by TLC, eluent, petroleum ether/
chloroform, 2/1, V/V), THF was removed by a rotary evaporator. The residue
was cooled and water (30 mL) was added. The resulting solution was extracted
with CH2Cl2 (3 ꢂ 30 mL). All the combined CH2Cl2 solutions were dried with
anhydrous Na2SO4 and then evaporated under reduced pressure. The resulting
residue was purified via silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/
chloroform, 2/1, V/V) to give compound 5a (1.36 g) as white solid. Yield 78.2%;
mp 73ꢁ74 °C; IR (KBr)
m
: 3050 (Ar-H), 2931, 2863 (CH2), 1594, 1484, 1452
mp 246ꢁ248 °C; IR (KBr)
1511, 1484, 1459, 1436 (aromatic frame), 1327, 1209, 1152, 1116, 848, 748,
716 cmꢁ1 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d: 5.45 (s, 4H, N–CH2), 7.02 (s, 4H, Ph-H),
7.21ꢁ7.26 (m, 4H, carbazole 3,6-H), 7.30ꢁ7.32 (m, 4H, carbazole 2,7-H),
7.38ꢁ7.40 (d, 2H, J = 4 Hz, carbazole 1-H), 7.40ꢁ7.41 (d, 2H, J = 4 Hz, carbazole
8-H), 8.10ꢁ8.12 (m, 4H, carbazole 4,5-H) ppm; 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d:
136.6 (carbazole 10,80-C), 126.8 (Ph 1-C), 125.8 (Ph 2-C), 122.5 (carbazole 40,50-
C), 120.4 (carbazole 2,7-C), 119.2 (carbazole 4,5-C), 116.3 (carbazole 3,6-C),
108.8 (carbazole 1,8-C), 46.2 (N-CH2) ppm; MS (m/z): 459 [M+Na]+, 436 [M]+;
HRMS (TOF) calcd for C32H25N2 [M+H]+, 437.2018; found, 437.2015.
m: 3046, 3026 (Ar-H), 2913, 2853 (CH2), 1628, 1595,
(aromatic frame), 1325, 1230, 1152, 1076, 815, 751, 724, 664 cmꢁ1
;
1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) d: 1.76ꢁ1.84 (m, 2H, imidazole-CH2CH2), 1.88ꢁ1.92 (m, 2H,
carbazole-CH2CH2), 3.79ꢁ3.82 (t, 2H, J = 6.8 Hz, imidazole-CH2), 4.32ꢁ4.36 (t,
2H, J = 6.4 Hz, carbazole-CH2), 6.76 (s, 1H, imidazole 4-H), 7.01 (s, 1H,
imidazole 5-H), 7.23ꢁ7.27 (m, 2H, carbazole 3,6-H), 7.35 (m, 2H, carbazole
2,7-H), 7.37 (s, 1H, imidazole 2-H), 7.45ꢁ7.49 (m, 2H, carbazole 1,8-H),
8.09ꢁ8.12 (m, 2H, carbazole 4,5-H) ppm; MS (m/z): 312 [M+Na]+, 290 [M]+,
222 [Mꢁimidazole]+; HRMS (TOF) calcd for C19H20N3 [M+H]+, 290.1657; found,
290.1652.
;
Synthesis of 9-(6-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)hexyl)-9H-carbazole (3c): A mixture of
1H-1,2,4-triazole (0.50 g, 7 mmol), 9-(6-bromohexyl)-9H-carbazole (1.44 g,
5 mmol), potassium carbonate (1.43 g, 10 mmol) and TBAB (tetrabutyl
ammonium bromide, 5 mg) in acetonitrile (30 mL) was stirred at 45 °C. After
the reaction came to the end (monitored by TLC, eluent, chloroform/methanol,
8/1, V/V), the solvent was evaporated and then water (30 mL) was added. The
resulting mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 ꢂ 30 mL), the combined
organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and then evaporated under
reduced pressure. The resulting residue was purified via silica gel column
chromatography (chloroform/methanol, 8/1, V/V) to give compound 3c (1.06 g)
14. (a) Kadi, A. A.; El-Brollosy, N. R.; Al-Deeb, O. A.; Habib, E. E.; Ibrahim, T. M.; El-
Emam, A. A. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 42, 235; (b) Özbek, N.; Katırcıog˘lu, H.;
Karacan, N.; Baykal, T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 5105. Experimental
determination of antibacterial and antifungal activities. The minimal inhibitory
concentrations (MICs) of the title compounds were determined in vitro by the
modified microbroth dilution method according to the methods defined by the
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. The test strains were
provided by the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southwest University.
Fluconazole and chloramphenicol obtained from their respective
manufacturers served as controls. The prepared compounds 1–5 were
evaluated for their antibacterial activity against S. aureus ATCC 29213, MRSA
N 315 and B. subtilis ATCC 21216 as Gram-positive, E. coli ATCC 25922, P.
aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and B. proteus ATCC 49027 as Gram-negative bacteria.
The bacterial suspension was adjusted with sterile saline to a concentration of
1 ꢂ 105 CFU. The test compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
to prepare the stock solutions. The test compounds and reference drugs were
prepared in Mueller–Hinton broth (Guangdong huaikai microbial sci. & tech
co., Ltd, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China) by twofold serial dilution to obtain the
as white solid. Yield 76.4%; mp 79ꢁ80 °C; IR (KBr)
2857 (CH2), 1595, 1511, 1485, 1454 (aromatic frame), 1274, 1235 (triazole
frame), 1136, 1016, 885, 754, 725, 683 cmꢁ1 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) d:
m: 3100, 3052 (Ar-H), 2928,
;
1.26ꢁ1.35 (m, 2H, carbazole-CH2CH2CH2), 1.36ꢁ1.42 (m, 2H, triazole-
CH2CH2CH2), 1.78ꢁ1.84 (m, 2H, carbazole-CH2CH2), 1.85ꢁ1.91 (m, 2H,
triazole-CH2CH2), 4.05ꢁ4.08 (t, 2H, J = 7 Hz, carbazole-CH2), 4.28ꢁ4.31 (t, 2H,
J = 7 Hz, triazole-CH2), 7.21ꢁ7.23 (d, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz, carbazole 3-H), 7.24ꢁ7.25
(d, 1H, J = 4 Hz, carbazole 6-H), 7.36 (s, 1H, carbazole 2-H), 7.38 (s, 1H,
carbazole 7-H), 7.44ꢁ7.48 (m, 2H, carbazole 1,8-H), 7.91 (s, 1H, carbazole 4-H),
7.95 (s, 1H, triazole 5-H), 8.09 (s, 1H, carbazole 5-H), 8.11 (s, 1H, triazole 3-H)
ppm; MS (m/z): 341 [M+Na]+, 319 [M]+; HRMS (TOF) calcd for C20H23N4
[M+H]+, 319.1923; found, 319.1928.
required concentrations of 512, 256, 128, 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 0.5 lg/mL. These
dilutions were inoculated and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. To ensure that the
solvent had no effect on bacterial growth, a control test was performed with
test medium supplemented with DMSO at the same dilutions as used in the
experiment. The new compounds were evaluated for their antifungal activity
Synthesis of 1-(4-((9H-carbazol-9-yl) methyl) benzyl-4- (2,4-dichlorobenzyl)-1H-
1,2,4-triazolium chloride (4):
A
mixture of 9-(4-((1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-
against C. albicans ATCC 76615 and A. fumigatus ATCC 96918. A spore
yl)methyl)benzyl)-9H-carbazole (0.74 g, 2.2 mmol) and 2,4-dichlorobenzyl
chloride (0.49 g, 2.5 mmol) in acetonitrile (15 mL) was stirred at 80 °C. After
the reaction came to the end, the solvent was evaporated under reduced
pressure. The residue was washed three times with petroleum ether
suspension in sterile distilled water was prepared from 1-day old culture of
the fungi growing on Sabouraud agar (SA) media. The final spore concentration
was 1ꢁ5 ꢂ 103 spore mLꢁ1. From the stock solutions of the tested compounds
and reference antifungal fluconazole, dilutions in sterile RPMI 1640 medium
(Neuronbc Laboraton Technology CO., Ltd, Beijing, China) were made resulting
(30ꢁ60 °C) and dried to give compound
82.4%; mp 229ꢁ230 °C; IR (KBr) : 3093, 3009 (Ar-H), 2940, 2817 (CH2), 1630,
1594, 1573, 1528, 1483, 1459 (aromatic frame), 1347, 1329, 1183, 928, 775,
740, 559 cmꢁ1 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) d: 5.52 (s, 2H, carbazole-CH2),
4 (0.97 g) as white solid. Yield
m
in eleven wanted concentrations (0.5–512 lg/mL) of each tested compound.
These dilutions were inoculated and incubated at 35 °C for 24 h. The drug
MIC50 was defined as the first well with an approximate 50% reduction in
growth compared to the growth of the drug-free well. The minimum inhibitory
;
5.55 (s, 2H, PhCH2-triazole), 5.67 (s, 2H, triazole-CH2-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)),
7.18ꢁ7.19 (d, 2H, J = 3.2 Hz, Ph-H), 7.20ꢁ7.21 (d, 2H, J = 3 Hz, 2,4-
dichlorobenzyl 5,6-H), 7.23 (s, 1H, 2,4-dichlorobenzyl 3-H), 7.30ꢁ7.32 (d, 2H,
J = 8 Hz, Ph-H), 7.40ꢁ7.44 (m, 2H, carbazole 3,6-H), 7.51ꢁ7.54 (m, 1H,
carbazole 2-H), 7.58 (s, 1H, carbazole 7-H), 7.59ꢁ7.60 (d, 1H, J = 3.6 Hz,
carbazole 8-H), 7.61 (s, 1H, triazole 5-H), 7.74ꢁ7.75 (d, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz, carbazole
concentration (MIC50) values (in lg/mL) were summarized in Table 1.
15. Yun, S.; Ihm, H.; Kim, H. G.; Kim, J. K.; Kim, K. S. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2467.
16. Chang, C. C.; Kuo, I. C.; Ling, I. F.; Chen, C. T.; Chen, H. C.; Lou, P. J.; Lin, J. J.;
Chang, T. C. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 4490.