1868
H. N. A. Tran et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 1866–1868
Table 1
Cell viability and anti-prion activity on ScGT1 cells of library compounds
Mb
% PrPSc inhibition at 1
l
Mc
EC50
(
lM)
LC50 (lM)
c
b
Cmpd
% of Viable cells at 1
l
1a
1b
2a
2b
3a
3b
4a
4b
5a
5b
6a
6b
7a
7b
71.6 5.4a
91.2 6.8
81.4 8.7
74.1 4.3
40.7 5.5
52.3 5.9
88.2 6.1
91.3 8.8
95.5 6.2
96.1 7.5
68.4 7.3
80.2 5.8
96.0 7.6
65.9 3.4
0.36 0.034a
0.29 0.05
0.23 0.01
0.31 0.03
ND
ND
6.6 0.4
28.1 1.5
4.8 0.7
11.4 0.5
73.2 3.3
18.1 0.5
0.25 0.04
0.43 0.01
0.87 0.1
3.6 0.5
7.7 1.2
2.4 0.2
a
Values are the mean of three experiments, standard deviations are given.
ScGT1 cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS, plated 25000 cells in each well of 96-well plates. The compounds were dissolved in DMSO (100%) and diluted in PBS 1X
b
before adding various concentrations (1 nM–10 lM) and incubated for 5 days at 37 °C, 5% CO2. The results were developed by Calcein-AM fluorescence dye and read by
microplate reader.
c
The effect of library compounds on inhibition of scrapie prion replication. ScGT1 cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS, split 1:10 into Petri dishes and incubated for
M), being non-toxic for the cells, were added to the plates. After a 5-day incubation, proteins
2 days at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Then, various compound concentrations (0.1 nM–1
l
of cells were extracted, quantified, digested with proteinase K (PK), and Western-blotted.
challenging to design chemical entities able to target PPIs, these
studies might shed light on the underlying principles governing
molecular recognition and the chemical basis for the inhibition of
quinone derivatives in prions.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the University of Bologna (to MLB)
and by Friuli-Venezia-Giulia Region through the project ‘Search for
new drugs’ (SeND) (to GL). The authors wish to thank Gabriella
Furlan for editing and proofreading the manuscript. Damiano Roc-
chi is acknowledged for excellent technical assistance.
Cmpd 6a
µM
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
kDa
50
37
PK -
References and notes
25
1. Arkin, M. R.; Wells, J. A. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2004, 3, 301.
2. Forman, M. S.; Trojanowski, J. Q.; Lee, V. M. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 1055.
3. Trojanowski, J. Q.; Lee, V. M. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 2000, 924, 62.
4. Nooren, I. M.; Thornton, J. M. Embo J. 2003, 22, 3486.
5. Kranjc, A.; Bongarzone, S.; Rossetti, G.; Biarnes, X.; Cavalli, A.; Bolognesi, M. L.;
Roberti, M.; Legname, G.; Carloni, P. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2009, 5, 2565.
6. Soto, C. FEBS Lett. 2001, 498, 204.
50
37
PK +
7. Soto, C. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2003.
8. Gestwicki, J. E.; Marinec, P. S. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2007, 10,
667.
25
9. Haydar, S. N.; Yun, H. E. D.; Staal, R. G. W.; Hirst, W. D. Small-Molecule Protein–
Protein Interaction Inhibitors as Therapeutic Agents for Neurodegenerative
Diseases: Recent Progress and Future Directions. In Annual Reports in Medicinal
Chemistry; Elsevier Academic: San Diego, 2009; Vol. 44, p 51.
10. Blazer, L. L.; Neubig, R. R. Neuropsychopharmacology 2009, 34, 126.
11. Xu, Y.; Shi, J.; Yamamoto, N.; Moss, J. A.; Vogt, P. K.; Janda, K. D. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2006, 14, 2660.
Figure 2. Western blot of protease-digested ScGT1 cell lysates depicting the
presence or absence of prions (PrPSc) after treatment with 6a before (up) or after
(bottom) proteinase K (PK).
12. Caughey, B.; Baron, G. S. Nature 2006, 443, 803.
13. Soto, C.; Kascsak, R. J.; Saborio, G. P.; Aucouturier, P.; Wisniewski, T.; Prelli, F.;
Kascsak, R.; Mendez, E.; Harris, D. A.; Ironside, J.; Tagliavini, F.; Carp, R. I.;
Frangione, B. Lancet 2000, 355, 192.
14. Sellarajah, S.; Boussard, C.; Lekishvili, T.; Brown, D. R.; Gilbert, I. H. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2008, 43, 2418.
O
O
O
O
H
N
H
N
A
A
A
N
H
A
N
H
15. Bartolini, M.; Bertucci, C.; Bolognesi, M. L.; Cavalli, A.; Melchiorre, C.;
Andrisano, V. ChemBioChem 2007, 8, 2152.
16. Bolognesi, M. L.; Banzi, R.; Bartolini, M.; Cavalli, A.; Tarozzi, A.; Andrisano, V.;
Minarini, A.; Rosini, M.; Tumiatti, V.; Bergamini, C.; Fato, R.; Lenaz, G.; Hrelia,
P.; Cattaneo, A.; Recanatini, M.; Melchiorre, C. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 4882.
17. Pawar, A. P.; Dubay, K. F.; Zurdo, J.; Chiti, F.; Vendruscolo, M.; Dobson, C. M. J.
Mol. Biol. 2005, 350, 379.
18. Yung, L.; Huang, Y.; Lessard, P.; Legname, G.; Lin, E. T.; Baldwin, M.; Prusiner, S.
B.; Ryou, C.; Guglielmo, B. J. BMC Infect. Dis. 2004, 4, 53.
19. Ghaemmaghami, S.; Ahn, M.; Lessard, P.; Giles, K.; Legname, G.; DeArmond, S.
J.; Prusiner, S. B. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000673.
20. Gazit, E. Faseb J. 2002, 16, 77.
21. Lewell, X. Q.; Judd, D. B.; Watson, S. P.; Hann, M. M. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.
1998, 38, 511.
22. Fragmenter was used for molecular decomposition to fragments and R-groups,
A= Cl > Br
A= Cl > Br
Score=100
Score=88
Amine1
O
A
H
N
Amine1
H
N
A
N
H
O
Ester
O
Amine1
A= Cl > Br
Score=0
Score=90
Figure 3. Substructures identified from the synthesized library.