C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
bond produces C, in which the Cu-C bond is stabilized by the
electronic effect of the adjacent silyl- or aryl- group (R1 or R2).
These effects would be responsible for the high insertion
regioselectivities.8 Alkyl-substituted starting compounds cannot
undergo this step because of the high alkene LUMO level and
the lack of the electronic effect in C. Ring closure then proceeds
through alkoxycuprate D, which is formed by coordination of
K(O-t-Bu) to C and would facilitate the intramolecular nucleo-
philic substitution.12 The poor product yields observed for the
aryl substrate bearing an electron-withdrawing group could be
attributed to low intermediate nucleophilicity in this ring-closing
step. The stereochemical outcome suggests that the intramo-
lecular substitution proceeds with retention of the configuration
on the carbon atom at the copper center. We thus speculate that
the ring-closing step proceeds through Cu(III) metallacycle
structure E. This explains the significant drop in the yield of 3j
(n ) 3), as the formation of seven-membered Cu(III) metalla-
cycle would be unfavorable in comparison with five- and six-
membered ones (n ) 1, 2). The catalytic cycle is closed by the
formation of 3 and potassium methanesulfonate accompanied
by the regeneration of A.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
compound characterization data. This material is available free of charge
References
(1) (a) Lee-Ruff, E.; Mladenova, G. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 1449–1484. (b)
Namyslo, J.; Kaufmann, D. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 1485–1538.
(2) For examples of the syntheses of cyclobutylboron compounds, see: (a)
Brener, L.; Brown, H. C. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 2702–2704. (b) Hollis,
W. G., Jr.; Lappenbusch, W. C.; Everberg, K. A.; Woleban, C. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 7517–7520. (c) Gridnev, I. D.; Meller, A. J.
Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3599–3606. (d) Man, H. W.; Hiscox, W. C.;
Matteson, D. S. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 379–381.
(3) (a) Ito, H.; Kawakami, C.; Sawamura, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
16034–16035. (b) Ito, H.; Ito, S.; Sasaki, Y.; Matsuura, K.; Sawamura,
M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14856–14857. (c) Ito, H.; Sasaki, Y.;
Sawamura, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15774–15775. (d) Ito, H.;
Kosaka, Y.; Nonoyama, K.; Sasaki, Y.; Sawamura, M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7424–7427. (e) Ito, H.; Yamanaka, H.; Tateiwa, J.;
Hosomi, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6821–6825. (f) Sasaki, Y.; Zhong,
C.; Sawamura, M.; Ito, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1226–1227.
(4) For selected other publications on copper(I)-catalyzed reactions with
diboron, see: (a) Takahashi, K.; Ishiyama, T.; Miyaura, N. Chem. Lett.
2000, 29, 982–983. (b) Laitar, D. S.; Tsui, E. Y.; Sadighi, J. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 11036–11037. (c) Lee, J.; Yun, J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 145–147. (d) Lillo, V.; Prieto, A.; Bonet, A.; D´ıaz-
Requejo, M. M.; Ram´ırez, J.; Pe´rez, P. J.; Ferna´ndez, E. Organometallics
2009, 28, 659–662.
(5) (a) House, H. O. Modern Synthetic Reactions, 2nd ed.; W. A. Benjamin:
Menlo Park, CA, 1972; p 542. (b) Knipe, A. C.; Stirling, C. J. M. J. Chem.
Soc. B 1968, 67–71.
(6) This is the first example of 1-silyl-2-borylcyclobutanes. All of the products
(trans- and cis-3a-i) of the copper(I)-catalyzed reaction are new com-
pounds.
(7) For a metal-free reaction, see: Lee, K. S.; Zhugralin, A. R.; Hoveyda, A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7253–7255.
(8) The highly reactive and regioselective feature observed in the reaction of
the silyl substrates is due to the R-stabilization effect of the silyl groups.
See: (a) Brinkman, E. A.; Berger, S.; Brauman, J. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 8304–8310. Also see ref 3d. For a similar effect in the borylation
of alkenylboronates, see: (b) Lee, Y.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 3160–3161. For aryl substrates, the electron-withdrawing effect
of the aryl groups on the alkene π system is important. (c) Laitar, D. S.;
Tsui, E. Y.; Sadighi, J. P. Organometallics 2006, 25, 2405–2408. (d) Dang,
L.; Zhao, H. T.; Lin, Z. Y.; Marder, T. B. Organometallics 2007, 26, 2824–
2832.
Figure 1. Proposed mechanism for the copper(I)-catalyzed ring forma-
tion.
(9) Brown, H. C.; Singh, S. M.; Rangaishenvi, M. V. J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51,
3150–3155.
(10) Miura, K.; Hondo, T.; Nakagawa, T.; Takahashi, T.; Hosomi, A. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 385–388.
(11) Hupe, E.; Marek, I.; Knochel, P. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2861–2863.
In summary, we have developed a copper(I)-catalyzed reaction
that produces 1,2-disubstituted cyclobutanes, which are useful
synthetic building blocks for the preparation of cyclobutane
derivatives. The reaction proceeds in a stereospecific manner, with
(Z)- and (E)- homoallylic sulfonates being converted to the trans
and cis products, respectively. The development of enantioselective
versions of this reaction with chiral ligands is currently under
investigation.
(12) Using an excess amount of tert-butoxide with respect to the copper(I)
salt was crucial for ensuring ring closure. The reaction of (Z)-1a and 2
in the presence of CuCl (110 mol %), K(O-t-Bu) (100 mol %), and
dppp (10 mol %) in THF was very slow, despite the presence of a large
amount of copper(I), and afforded trans-3a in yields of 7% after 3 h
and 10% after 20 h. Conversely, a similar reaction with CuCl (110 mol
%), excess K(O-t-Bu) (150 mol %), and dppp (10 mol %) went to
completion smoothly within 3 h, affording trans-3a with a yield of 97%.
It is known that the formation of borylcopper(I) intermediates and their
addition to activated alkenes proceeds without excess base, which
suggests that K(O-t-Bu) most probably affects the cyclization step (see
refs 3d and 8).
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid
for Scientific Research (B) (JSPS) and the PRESTO Program (JST).
We thank Prof. K. Tanino for helpful discussions.
JA101793A
9
5992 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 17, 2010