tography. Installation of the additional chiral center in 12
turned out to be more challenging than we anticipated as
even the best Rh catalysts give only modest diastereoselec-
tivity in the asymmetric hydrogenation reaction. Selected
results of Rh-catalyzed hydrogenation of 12 with various
catalysts are reported in Table 1 in the Supporting Informa-
tion.4 Although various DIOP and bis-2,5-diphenylphosphi-
nohexane ligands8a give excellent conversion at 90 psi of
hydrogen in deoxygenated methanolic solution, the best result
8b
is obtained with [Rh(Et-DuPhos)(COD)]+OTf- as the
precatalyst, which yields 8.5:1.0 dr of 13a, which upon
deprotection gave 13b.
Figure 2
intramolecular N-arylation.
. Lyngbyatoxin via asymmetric hydrovinylation and
With the appropriately protected substrates 13b and 13c
in hand, we first examined various intramolecular amination
procedures to prepare the nine-membered lactam. Our initial
attempts focused on Pd-catalyzed N-arylation reactions9 of
13c, under conditions remniscent of Buchwald’s synthesis
of dehydrobufotenine.10 These experiments (Table 2, Sup-
porting Information)4 were uniformly unsuccessful and lead
to no discernible products. Next we turned our attention to
the Fukuyama modification9f of the Ullmann-Goldberg
reaction, which he has used very effectively to prepare highly
functionalized nitrogen heterocycles. Studies4 of various
substrates quickly revealed that the substrate 13b, with both
amines deprotected, is compatible with the standard condi-
tions under which these cyclization reactions are run.
However, none of the expected tricyclic compound (15b) is
formed under a variety of conditions. Instead, a diketopip-
erazine derivative 14 is formed in acceptable yield (eq 1).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Indolylpeptide for Cyclization
The structure of the tetracyclic diketopiperazine 14 has been
unambiguously established by determination of the solid-state
structure of a crystalline hydrate. Several features of this reaction
are worthy of note: (i) under these conditions, only the 4-Br
group undergoes displacement, leaving behind the 7-Br un-
touched; (ii) in the product isolated, there is no epimerization
carboxaldehyde 6, which after Boc-protection of the nitrogen
is converted into the dehydroamino acid derivative 12 via a
modified Horner-Emmons reaction using the phosphonate
11.6 Schmidt’s phosphonate 11 was prepared by Rh-catalyzed
carbene insertion into a N-H bond of the amide 9.7 The
Horner-Emmons reaction of the aldehyde 7 with the
phosphonate 11 under the prescribed procedure gives 71%
of the pure (Z)-dehydrodipeptide 12 after column chroma-
(9) For papers by leading researchers in the area, see: (a) Hartwig, J. F.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2046. (b) Yang, B. H.; Buchwald, S. L.
J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 125. For key references of Cu-mediated
aminations, see: (c) Klapars, A.; Huang, X; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 7421. (d) Hassan, J.; Se´vignon, M.; Gozzi, C.; Schulz, E.;
Lemaire, M. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 1359. (e) Tye, J. W.; Weng, Z.; Johns,
A. M.; Incarvito, C. D.; Hartwig, J. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9971.
(f) Kubo, T.; Katoh, C.; Yamada, K.; Okano, K.; Tokuyama, H.; Fukuyama,
T. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 11230. (g) Ma, D.; Cai, Q. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008,
41, 1450. (h) Evano, G.; Blanchard, N.; Toumi, M. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108,
3054. (i) Hartwig, J. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1534. For an especially
valuable review that highlights the historical aspects of this crowded area
and the relative synthetic advantages of the various methods, see: (j) Ley,
S. V.; Thomas, A. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5400.
(5) (a) Bartoli, G.; Palmieri, G.; Bosco, M.; Dalpozzo, R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1989, 30, 2129. (b) Berthelot, A.; Piguel, S.; Le Dour, G.; Vidal, J. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9835.
(6) Schmidt, U.; Griesser, H.; Leitenberger, V.; Lieberknecht, A.;
Mangold, R.; Meyer, R.; Riedl, B. Synthesis 1992, 487.
(7) Buck, R. T.; Clarke, P. A.; Coe, D. M.; Drysdale, M. J.; Ferris, L.;
Haigh, D.; Moody, C. J.; Pearson, N. D.; Swann, E. Chem.sEur. J. 2000,
6, 2160.
(10) Peat, A. J.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1028.
(11) (a) Yamada, K.; Kubo, T.; Tokuyama, H.; Fukuyama, T. Synlett
2002, 231. (b) Okano, K.; Tokuyama, H.; Fukuyama, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 7136. (c) Yamada, K.; Kurokawa, T.; Tokuyama, H.; Fukuyama,
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6630.
(8) (a) Yan, Y.; RajanBabu, T. V. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4137. (b) DuPhos
ligands: Burk, M. J.; Feaster, J. E.; Nugent, W. A.; Harlow, R. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 10125.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 9, 2010
2163