A R T I C L E S
Zhu et al.
Figure 1. Postulated turnover-limiting step in hydrogenations with Crab-
tree’s catalyst analogues.
on the carbene-oxazoline complex 1 converge on very similar
preferred reaction pathways. This involves loss of the COD
ligand and complexation with the alkene substrate and two
molecules of dihydrogen. The rate-limiting step in the catalytic
cycle is transformation of this tetrahydride A into the σ-alkyl
species B (Figure 1).
Figure 2. Postulate for acidities of (a) the P-Ir-H complexes relative to
(b) carbene-Ir-H systems.
This mechanism involves alternation between iridium(III) and
-(V) oxidation states. It indicates why Crabtree’s catalyst
analogues are able to hydrogenate “coordinatively unfunction-
alized” tri- and tetrasubstituted alkenes, whereas rhodium
complexes such as Wilkinson’s catalyst do not. Specifically,
the positively charged and higher oxidation state Ir complexes
are more electrophilic than neutral and lower oxidation state
Rh complexes, so they have more affinity to the π-electron
density of alkene substrates. Moreover, the small steric demands
of a tetrahydride ligand set facilitate coordination of alkenes
with three or four substituents that are intrinsically hindered.
Finally, hydrogenations with these Ir complexes are not
particularly sensitive to oxygen, as expected for high oxidation
state Ir intermediates. Involvement of intermediates A also
explains why the catalytic cycle is so hard to follow spectro-
scopically because these tetrahydrides are in a rapid, dynamic
equilibrium with dihydrido-dihydrogen complexes.15,17
Figure 2 contrasts the factors driving dissociation of protons
from the iridium(V) intermediates A (shown in abbreviated
form) where the ligating group X is either a phosphine or an
N-heterocyclic carbene intermediate. In both cases, an irid-
ium(III) species forms; that is, the metal is reduced as its electron
density increases. We postulate that this dissociation is easier
when X is a P-ligand than a carbene because P-ligands are (i)
inferior σ-donors, hence are less able to stabilize Ir(V),18 and
(ii) superior π-acceptors, thus better able to stabilize Ir(III).
Consequently, Crabtree’s catalyst and P-ligated derivatives
should be more acidic than the corresponding carbenes.
Here we used density functional theory (TPSS functional;19
see Supporting Information) to calculate acidity differences for
the key metal hydride complexes involved in hydrogenations
Table 1. pKa Values for Transition Metal Hydrides
pKa
MeCN
calca
CH2Cl2
complex
exptl
∆pKab
∆pKab
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
[HNi(dmpe)2]+
24.4 ( 0.2
31.1
14.7 ( 0.3
22.2
21.7
32.3
13.8
24.6
11.3
9.8
11.5
17.4
36.1
11.9
22.5
4.0
14.8
1.5
0
1.7
7.6
26.3
13.4
24.0
5.5
16.3
1.4
0
1.8
7.4
30.0
[HPt(dmpe)2]+
[HNi(dppe)2]+
[HPt(dppe)2]+
C
D
E
F
G
a Experimental pKa of Ni and Pt complexes as references, and all
have a standard deviation of (2.2. b Calculated relative pKa with the
catalyst intermediate D as reference.
with Crabtree’s catalyst analogues. These data were then
compared to reference systems to estimate absolute pKa values.20
Almost all reliable experimental pKa’s for metal hydrides in
the literature are measured in acetonitrile, so the calculated pKa’s
were first obtained by simulating reactions in this medium.
In validation work, calculations were performed for several
metal hydrides for which pKa’s have been measured in MeCN
(Table 1, entries 1-4). The calculated pKa differences were then
related to absolute pKa values using the literature experimental
data for each of the other three metal hydride controls, then
averaged to give the data shown in Table 1, entries 1-4. These
numbers are consistent with the experimental data with a
maximum deviation of 2.7 for entry l, which concerns a complex
of pKa 21.7. This close agreement for the control complexes
indicates a high degree of confidence for application of the same
technique to calculate acidities for the key intermediates in
hydrogenations by Crabtree’s catalyst analogues.
Calculated data for the hydrogenation intermediates are shown
in Table 1, entries 5-9. Considering first the data in MeCN,
Crabtree’s catalyst C was calculated to be less acidic than the
P-oxazoline complex D, so the latter was used as a “bottom-
line reference”. The N,P-ligands in D and E are alike; hence
these complexes would be expected to have similar acidities,
and the calculations are consistent with this. Moreover, higher
acidity for the diphenylphosphinite complex D relative to E was
(9) Magee, M. P.; Norton, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1778–
1779.
(10) Guan, H.; Iimura, M.; Magee, M. P.; Norton, J. R.; Zhu, G. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7805–7814.
(11) Noyori, R.; Ohkuma, T. Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 1493–1501.
(12) Noyori, R. Acta Chem. Scand. 1996, 50, 380–390.
(13) Mazet, C.; Smidt, S. P.; Meuwly, M.; Pfaltz, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 14176–14181.
(14) Dietiker, R.; Chen, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5513–5516.
(15) Cui, X.; Fan, Y.; Hall, M. B.; Burgess, K. Chem.sEur. J. 2005, 11,
6859–6868.
(16) Brandt, P.; Hedberg, C.; Andersson, P. Chem.sEur. J. 2003, 9, 339–
347.
(17) Fan, Y.; Cui, X.; Burgess, K.; Hall, M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 16688–16689.
(18) Chianese, A. R.; Li, X.; Janzen, M. C.; Faller, J. W.; Crabtree, R. H.
Organometallics 2003, 22, 1663–7.
(19) Tao, J. M.; Perdew, J. P.; Staroverov, V. N.; Scuseria, G. E. Phys.
ReV. Lett. 2003, 91, 146401–146404.
(20) Qi, X.-J.; Fu, Y.; Liu, L.; Guo, Q.-X. Organometallics 2007, 26, 4197–
4203.
9
6250 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 17, 2010