Published on Web 04/15/2010
Tandem Processes Identified from Reaction Screening:
Nucleophilic Addition to Aryl N-Phosphinylimines Employing
La(III)-TFAA Activation
Hidenori Kinoshita, Oscar J. Ingham, Winnie W. Ong, Aaron B. Beeler, and
John A. Porco, Jr.*
Department of Chemistry and Center for Chemical Methodology and Library DeVelopment
(CMLD-BU), Boston UniVersity, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Received January 14, 2010; E-mail: porco@bu.edu
Abstract: Reaction screening of nucleophilic reaction partners for addition to N-diphenylphosphinylimines
employing lanthanum(III) triflate as a catalyst and trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) as an activator is reported.
A number of tandem processes leading to novel chemotypes including aza-Prins/intramolecular Friedel-Crafts
annulations have been identified, and both reaction scope and mechanism further investigated.
Scheme 1. Friedel-Crafts and Aza-ene Reactions with 1
Introduction
We recently reported Friedel-Crafts and aza-ene reactions
between N-phosphinylimines1 and carbon nucleophiles using a
La(OTf)3 ·nH2O/TFAA activation protocol (Scheme 1).2 For
example, treatment of N-diphenylphosphinylimine 1 and furan
2
with trifluoroacetic anhydride (TFAA) and catalytic
La(OTf)3 ·nH2O under microwave irradiation led to production
of Friedel-Crafts product 3. Alternatively, use of methylenecy-
clopentene 4 as a nucleophile led to homoallylic amide 5 in
good yield (82%). To study the scope and limitations of these
reactions and expand their utility, we undertook reaction
screening3 of a panel of nucleophilic reaction partners. Herein,
we report the results of this study, identification of a number
of tandem reaction processes producing novel chemotypes, and
follow-up studies to investigate the reaction scope and mechanism.
ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-MS/ELS.6
Based on analytical data,5 decisions to conduct scale-up reactions
to elucidate products were made. Reactions were scaled up 10-
fold (0.15 mmol), and the products isolated. Results of initial
reaction screening indicated that 17 of 33 reactions afforded
major products; 9 of 17 reactions afforded products correspond-
ing to adducts between the N-phosphinylimine substrate and
alkene reaction partner. Based on the screening results, products
were grouped into three major classes. The first reaction type
identified in the screen involved aza-Friedel-Crafts reactions
(Table 1).7 Thiophene 6 afforded the aza-Friedel-Crafts product
7 (Table 1, entry 1) as expected7d in contrast to pyrrole which
was unreactive under the reaction conditions (data not shown).
Interestingly, 2-methylindene 8 also provided aza-Friedel-
Crafts product 9 in 62% yield (Table 1, entry 2). Cyclopropy-
lbenzene 12 provided product 13 in 33% yield along with the
cyclic product 14 (6%). In this case, cyclopropane ring cleavage
of 12 to afford trans-ꢀ-methylstyrene occurred in situ under
Results and Discussion
For the reaction screen, 33 nucleophilic reaction partners were
selected with a number of entries based on reported imino-ene
reactions (Figure 1).4 Reactions were conducted using N-
phosphinylimine 1 (0.015 mmol) as a substrate, La(OTf)3 ·nH2O
(20 mol %), 5.0 equiv of TFAA (0.075 mmol), and 100 µL of
CH3CN under microwave irradiation at 80 °C.5 After the
reaction (10 min), the mixtures were filtered and evaluated using
(1) Weinreb, S. M.; Orr, R. K. Synthesis 2005, 1205.
(2) Ong, W. W.; Beeler, A. B.; Kesavan, S.; Panek, J. S.; Porco, J. A., Jr.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 7470.
(3) Beeler, A. B.; Su, S.; Singleton, C. A.; Porco, J. A., Jr. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2007, 129, 1413.
(4) For examples of imino-ene reactions, see: (a) Drury, W. J., III.; Ferraris,
D.; Cox, C.; Young, B.; Lectka, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
11006. (b) Ferraris, D.; Young, B.; Cox, C.; Dudding, T.; Drury, W. J.,
III.; Ryzhkov, L.; Taggi, A. E.; Lectka, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 67. (c) Caplan, N. A.; Hancock, F. E.; Bulman, P. C.; Hutchings,
G. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1685. (d) Aburel, P. S.; Zhuang,
W.; Hazell, R. G.; Jorgensen, K. A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3,
2344. (e) Terada, M.; Machioka, K.; Sorimachi, K. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2254.
(6) (a) Mazzeo, J. R.; Neue, U. D.; Kele, M.; Plumb, R. S. Anal. Chem.
2005, 77, 460 A. (b) Nova´kova´, L.; Matysova´, L.; Solich, P. Talanta
2006, 68, 908.
(7) For recent examples of aza-Friedel-Crafts alkylations, see: (a) Saaby,
S.; Bayo´n, P.; Aburel, P. S.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 2002,
67, 4352. (b) Luo, Y.; Li, C.-J. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1930. (c)
Esquivisas, J.; Arraya´s, R. G.; Carretero, J. C. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2006, 45, 629. (d) Jia, Y.-X.; Xie, J.-H.; Duan, H.-F.; Wang, L.-
X.; Zhou, Q.-L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1621. (e) Liu, C.-R.; Li, M.-B.;
Yang, C.-F.; Tian, S.-K. Chem. Commun. 2008, 1249.
(5) See Supporting Information for complete experimental details.
9
6412 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2010, 132, 6412–6418
10.1021/ja100346w 2010 American Chemical Society