Table 3. Substrate Scope for Substituted R-Aryl Sulfones
A: yield (%)
B: yield (%)
entry substrate (Hammett σ)
2a
3a
2b
3a
1
m-CN (0.62)
m-CF3 (0.46)
p-Cl (0.22)
m-OMe (0.10)
p-F (0.06)
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
31
37
64
88
79
61
81
74
53
43
10
41
40
29
17
8
69
78
81
82
91
87
87
86
85
79
71c
85
6
6
3
4
3
6
2
5
2
4
1
3
2
3
4
5
11
12
7
Figure 1. Possible reaction pathways.
6
o-F (ꢀ)
1g
1a
1h
1i
7
H (0.00)
8
m-Me (ꢀ0.06)
p-Me (ꢀ0.14)
o-Me (ꢀ)
8
because of the instability of the corresponding 1,2-dianion.4
Because of the higher affinity of fluoride for Si than for
Sn (bond dissociation energy: 565 kJ/mol for SiꢀF and
414 kJ/mol for SnꢀF),12 R-amido silane 4 is more reactive
toward a fluoride anion than is R-amido stannane,4 which
allows the carboxylation of 4a to proceed even at rt.
Next, substrate scope was examined under 0.5 MPa of CO2
pressure (Table 3 and Figure 2). A wide range of R-aryl
R-amido sulfones (1aꢀ1l) attached with electron-deficient as
9
6
10
11
12
1j
1
p-OMe (ꢀ0.28)
1k
1l
5
o-OMe (ꢀ)
5
a Yields were determined by 1H NMR analysis using 1,1,2,2-tetra-
chloroethane as an internal standard. b Isolated yields after column chro-
matography using 10% KF/SiO2 as a stationary phase. c Reaction time: 16 h.
well as -rich substituents on the aromatic rings with
different Hammett σ-values were all active in con-
trast to the previous system3 in which protodestannyla-
tion products were increased in response to the electron
deficiency of aromatic rings, while final carboxylation
hardly proceeded for electron-donating substrates (Table 3,
methodA3 versus B).4 Inaddition, stericallymorecrowded
ortho-substitutions also gave high yields (1g, 1j, and 1l).
It is noteworthy that cyano functionality, which is not
tolerable in the conventional Strecker synthesis, remained
intact in this sequence. Highly electron-donating substrates
1k and 1l, which had been sluggish for the previous system
(10 and 41%),3 were also reactive (71 and 85%).
Moreover, methylene catechol 1m, both R- and
β-naphthalene (1n and 1o), and heteroaromatic substrates
possessing 2-thienyl and 2-furyl groups (1p and 1q) were all
tolerated (Figure 2). Furthermore, one-pot reactions of
electron-rich 3-furyl sulfone 1r as well as substrates
having alkenyl groups 1sꢀ1w produced the correspond-
ing R-amino acid derivatives in moderate yields even
though they still needed a high temperature condition
(100 °C). 3-Furyl and these alkenyl substrates were
(7) (a) Levin., V. V.; Dilman, A. D.; Belyakov, P. A.; Struchkova,
M. I.; Tartakovsky, V. A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 5226. (b) Gritsenko.,
R. T.; Levin, V. V.; Dilman, A. D.; Belyakov, P. A.; Struchkova, M. I.;
Tartakovsky, V. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 2994. (c) Kosobokov,
M. D.; Dilman, A. D.; Struchkova, M. I.; Belyakov, P. A.; Hu, J. J. Org.
Chem. 2012, 77, 2080.
(8) (a) Ballweg, D. M.; Miller, R. C.; Gray, D. L.; Scheidt, K. A. Org.
€
Lett. 2005, 7, 1403. (b) Vyas, D. J.; Frohlich, R.; Oestreich, M. Org. Lett.
2011, 13, 2094.
(9) Carboxylations of C(sp3)-Si bonds by a fluoride were only
achieved using specific substrates such as 1-cyano-1-trimethylsilyl-
cyclopropane and (perfluoroalkyl)trimethylsilanes. See: (a) Ohno, M.;
Tanaka, H.; Komatsu, M.; Ohshiro, Y. Synlett 1991, 919. (b) Singh,
R. P.; Shreeve, J. M. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1818. (c) Babadzhanova,
L. A.; Kirij, N. V.; Yagupolskii, Y. L. J. Fluorine Chem. 2004, 125, 1095.
(d) Petko, K. I.; Kot, S. Y.; Yagupolskii, L. M. J. Fluorine Chem. 2008,
129, 301. For fluoride-mediated carboxylations of C(sp2)-Si bonds, see:
(e) Effenberger, F.; Spiegler, W. Chem. Ber. 1985, 118, 3900. For a recent
achievement of carboxylation of benzylic silanes using CO2, see:
(f) Mita, T.; Michigami, K.; Sato, Y. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 3462.
(10) Optically active 4a (97% ee) was synthesized according to the
reported procedure (ref 8a) and subjected to the fluoride-mediated
carboxylation. As a result, 2a was obtained in racemic form, indicating
that carboxylation would proceed via a benzylic anion species 8 rather
than a fluorosilicate 80.
(11) For the stabilization of lithium carbanion by a Boc group, see:
Park, Y. S.; Beak, P. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 1574.
(12) Emsley, J. The Elements, 3rd ed.; Oxford University Press:
New York, 1998.
(13) For transition metal (Rh or Cu)-catalyzed SiꢀB cleavage to
generate silyl anion equivalents, see: (a) Walter, C.; Auer, G.; Oestreich,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5675. (b) Walter, C.; Oestreich, M.
(14) For silyl anion generation triggered by a fluoride through SiꢀSi
bond cleavage, see: (a) Hiyama, T.; Obayashi, M.; Mori, I.; Nozaki, H.
J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 912. (b) Hiyama, T.; Obayashi, M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1983, 24, 4109. (c) Hiyama, T.; Obayashi, M.; Sawahata, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 4113.
€
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3818. (c) Walter, C.; Frohlich, R.;
Oestreich, M. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 5513. (d) Vyas, D. J.; Oestreich, M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8513. (e) Lee, K.-S.; Hoveyda, A. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 2898. (f) Welle, A.; Petrignet, J.; Tinant, B.;
Wouters, J.; Riant, O. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 10980. (g) Ibrahem, I.;
(15) For borylation of imines using pinB-Bpin by a methoxide anion
ꢀ
without transition metal catalysts, see: Sole, C.; Gulyas, H.; Fernandez,
ꢀ
ꢀ
E. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 3769.
ꢀ
Santoro, S.; Himo, F.; Cordova, A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 245.
(h) Kleeberg, C.; Feldmann, E.; Hartmann, E.; Vyas, D. J.; Oestreich,
M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 13538. (i) Calderone, J. A.; Santos, W. L.
Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2090. For a transition-metal-free method, see:
(j) O’Brien, J. M.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7712.
(16) It is also possible that the boron atom is prone to be activated by
a fluoride through the coordination of pinacol oxygen to a protic
additive. See: Awano, T.; Ohmura, T.; Suginome, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 20738.
6204
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 24, 2012