core was prepared with a protected diol as a synthon for
the trans-R,ꢀ-unsaturated amide, and the formation of the
macrolactam was achieved by ring-closing metathesis in
49% yield. After side chain attachment, the unsaturated
amide was revealed in the penultimate step. This synthesis
entails 16 linear steps (not including preparation of the
side chain) and proceeds in an excellent 9% overall yield.
The syringolin B synthesis used lysine and valine as
starting materials, assembled a polypeptide using standard
coupling methods, and then used a peptide coupling agent
at high dilution to close the macrolactam, which proceeded
in 30% yield. Glidobactin A, a natural product with a core
ring closely related to the syringolins, has also been
synthesized.7 Here, macrolactamization via a pentafluo-
rophenyl active ester gave the 12-membered ring in only
20% yield.
Our aim was a modular and general synthetic approach
to the syringolins with the potential for straightforward
preparation of structural variants simply by the substitution
of structurally variant modules (diversity-oriented syn-
thesis).8 The R,ꢀ-unsaturated amide of the syringolins
suggested an intramolecular Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons
condensation for the preparation of the 12-membered ring.
Such reactions have found utility in the high-yield
synthesis of macrolactones9 but have been applied to only
a few macrolactams.10
The total synthesis of syringolin B was a proving ground
for the macrocyclization. The C2-symmetric bis(valinyl)
urea side chain was prepared from two commercial
compounds: L-valine-derived isocyanate 1 and L-valine
tert-butyl ester hydrochloride, using a route developed by
Clerc et al.6 The monoacid was activated as the nicely
crystalline NHS active ester 2. Boc-L-Lysine was acylated
with the NHS active ester of diethylphosphonoacetic acid
(3) using a protocol developed for other acids,11 and then
a conventional peptide coupling with L-valinol was
executed. The two-step yield of 4 is 75%. Its Dess-Martin
oxidation sets up the key cylization reaction. The very
mild Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons protocol developed
by Helquist for the formation of acrylamides with high
selectivity for (E) stereochemistry was uniquely success-
ful.12 This contrasted with the outcome using several other
common methods. Helquist’s method was applied using
2 equiv of Zn2+, 1 equiv of TMEDA, and 4 equiv of Et3N
for 15 h at 5 mM concentration; the cyclization product
5 was obtained in 75% yield. No stereoisomers (NMR
and HPLC data) or dimers (MS data) were detected in
this product. The removal of the Boc group was performed
with HBr in acetic acid to give the amine salt in 100%
yield, and the free base was obtained by treatment with
the ion-exchange resin MP-carbonate in methanol. Cou-
pling of the amine with 2, a route similar to that used by
Clerc et al. for syringolin A,6 was disappointing, giving
yields of 7 of ca. 50%.
More reactive and sterically smaller acylating agents
for the macrolactam amine were therefore sought, and
amino acid N-carboxy anhydrides were considered. While
such reagents were popularized for solid-phase peptide
synthesis as the urethane derivatives,13 several examples
are known of peptide bond formation using free amino
acid N-carboxy anhydrides, which should be among the
most sterically undemanding of amino acid acylating
reagents. Although they can undergo ring-opening po-
lymerization, the use of organic solvents and low tem-
peratures has enabled them to be used for monoacylation
reactions.14 The appeal of this strategy is enhanced by
the commercial availability of many amino acid N-carboxy
anhydrides, as well as excellent procedures to prepare
them from Boc-amino acids.15 In the event, the free base
derived from 5 was treated with the commercially avail-
able valine N-carboxy anhydride 6 in DMF/dichlo-
romethane for 4 h at -78 °C and then 2 h at rt. Without
purification, the acylation mixture was subjected to urea
formation with 1, and the ester 7 was obtained in 55%
yield. As this route obviates the advanced preparation of
reagents like 2, it considerably streamlines side chain
preparation. It also makes the synthesis more modular,
enabling the simple preparation of side chain variants by
subsitution of the isocyanate and N-carboxy anhydride
components. Finally, it may be considered biomimetic,
as recent studies on the biosynthesis of the syringolins
have invoked N-carboxy anhydride 6 as one possible
intermediate in the formation of this unusual amino acid
urea.16 The saponification of 7 gave syringolin B, which
exhibited spectroscopic properties (1H NMR, 13C NMR)
matching those reported for the natural product.
(6) Clerc, J.; Groll, M.; Illich, D. J.; Bachmann, A. S.; Huber, R.;
Schellenberg, B.; Dudler, R.; Kaiser, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009,
106, 6507–6512.
With the phosphonate macrocyclization proven in the
syringolin B synthesis, we moved on to syringolin A
(Scheme 2). We required a method to prepare 3,4-
dehydrolysine intermediates, and the strategy that emerged
to address this need made for an even more modular
synthesis. Modules used for the macrolactam core include
(7) Schmidt, U.; Kleefeldt, A.; Mangold, R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1992, 1687–1689.
(8) Cordier, C.; Morton, D.; Murrison, S.; Nelson, A.; O’Leary-Steele,
C. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2008, 25, 719–737.
(9) Nicolaou, K. C.; Seitz, S. P.; Pavia, M. R.; Petasis, N. A. J. Org.
Chem. 1979, 44, 4011–4013. Nicolaou, K. C.; Seitz, S. P.; Pavia, M. R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 1222–1224. Tatsuta, K.; Masuda, N. J.
Antibiot. 1998, 51, 602–606. Harvey, J. E.; Raw, S. A.; Taylor, R. J. K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7209–7212. O’Neil, G. W.; Phillips, A. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5340–5341. Haidle, A. M.; Myers, A. G. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 12048–12053. Jiang, X.; Liu, B.; Lebreton,
S.; De Brabander, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6386–6387.
(10) Smith, A. B., III; Rano, T. A.; Chida, N.; Sulikowski, G. A.; Wood,
J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8008–8022. Baran, P. S.; Shenvi, R. A.;
Mitsos, C. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3714–3717.
(11) Schmitt, L.; Dietrich, C.; Tampe, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116,
8485–8491. Chen, W.-H.; Shao, X.-B.; Regen, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 12727–12735.
(13) Fuller, W. D.; Cohen, M. P.; Shabankareh, M.; Blair, R. K.;
Goodman, M.; Naider, F. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7414–7416.
Spencer, J. R.; Antonenko, V. V.; Delaet, N. G. J.; Goodman, M. Int. J.
Pept. Protein Res. 1992, 40, 282–293.
(14) Scho¨llkopf, U.; Neubauer, H. J. Synthesis 1982, 861–864.
(15) Wilder, R.; Mobashery, S. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 2755–2756.
Akssira, M.; Boumzebra, M.; Kasmi, H.; Dahdouh, A.; Roumestant,
M.-L.; Viallefont, P. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 9051–9060.
(16) Imker, H. J.; Walsh, C. T.; Wuest, W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 18263–18265.
(12) Schauer, D. J.; Helquist, P. Synthesis 2006, 3654–3660.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 10, 2010
2403