Scheme 1
Figure 2. ORTEP structure of 2f.
various donor and acceptor groups have been synthesized.
In addition, linear and cross-linked polymers containing the
DCH-Ru moieties have been prepared.
allowed for the isolation of pure OXA-Ru complexes in
their RuII/RuII state.
DCH and OXA ligands contain the CO-N-N-CO and
N-CO-CO-N moieties, respectively, and are structural
isomers. Accordingly, the ruthenium complexes based on the
OXA ligand or OXA-Ru complexes as shown in Figure 1,
should be considered as isomers to DCH-Ru complexes.
Since DCH and OXA ligands can be synthesized in a number
of different ways and can have different functional groups
for further manipulation, it is necessary to have access to
the OXA-Ru complexes for studying and comparing the
electrical and optical properties for potential applications.
However, surprisingly enough, OXA-Ru complexes have
not been reported and are still unknown in the literature to
date. We report herein the synthesis and characterization of
a new class of dinuclear ruthenium complexes based on the
oxamide ligands.
For DCH-Ru complexes, the NIR absorption depends on
the electronic environment of the two metal cations, which
is strongly influenced by the substituents on the ligands.
Changing the electron-withdrawing or electron-donating
ability of the ligands will affect the HOMO/LUMO energy
levels and thus cause changes in the NIR λmax values.
Accordingly, a series of OXA-Ru complexes containing
electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups on the
oxamide nitrogen atoms were prepared (Scheme 1).
The symmetric ligands (1a-h) were synthesized by
reaction of oxalyl chloride with the corresponding amines.
Unsymmetric ligands 1i and 1j were prepared in two steps,
first by refluxing aniline or 1-naphthylamine in diethyl
oxalate to give monsubstituted compounds that were sub-
sequently reacted with methylamine and (S)-(-)-R-methyl-
benzylamine, respectively. In all cases, the ligands were
isolated in yields greater than 80%. To make complexes 2a-
j, a mixture of ruthenium bis(bipyridine)dichloride and the
corresponding ligands were heated to reflux in the presence
of base under a nitrogen atmosphere. The purple complexes
were isolated upon addition of ammonium hexafluorophos-
phate and then passed through an alumina-gel column (eluted
with a mixture of acetonitrile and toluene, 1:1 v/v), which
Figure 2 shows the ORTEP crystal structure of complex
2f (as one of the stereoisomers).7 The crystals were grown
by dissolving 2f in acetone and slow evaporation of the
solvent at room temperature. The C-N-Cph-Cph torsion
angle is 69.2°, showing the weak resonance effect. Two fused
five-membered cyclic rings are planar, similar to the DCH-
Ru series.5 There is also π-π interaction between the
bipyridine groups within the unit cell.
Studies on the stereochemistry of mononuclear8 and
dinuclear ruthenium9 complexes have attracted much interest
in the area of supramolecular chemistry. In dinuclear
ruthenium complexes, the metal centers can possess right-
or left-handed chirality (∆ or Λ), respectively. The simplest
case for chiral OXA-Ru complexes, where the complex
possesses symmetric bridging and identical terminal units,
is shown in Figure 3 with meso (∆Λ) and two enantiomeric
isomers (∆∆, ΛΛ). However, by lowering the symmetry in
this system through altering the substituents on the bridging
and terminal units, it is possible to have a large number of
(7) Measurement was made on a Bruker SMART 1K CCD diffractometer
with graphite monochromated Mo KR (0.71073 Å) radiation. Data were
collected at the temperature 207(2) K, and the structure was solved by direct
methods and expended using Fourier techniques using SHELXTL. All non-
hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen atoms were included
in idealized positions and not refined. Data were merged and corrected for
beam inhomogeneous and absorption using SADSAB. Crystal size: 0.52
× 0.44 × 0.20 mm. Monoclinic, P2/n. Cell dimensions a ) 11.413(3) Å;
b ) 12.631(3) Å; c ) 22.655(5) Å; R ) 90°; â ) 95.192(4)°; γ ) 90°. V
) 3252.6(13) Å3 θmax)26.02°, F ) 1.502 g/cm3; R1 ) 0.0930 (for
,
reflections with I > 2σ(I)), wR2 ) 0.1559 (for all reflections).
(8) (a) Balzani, V.; Juris, A. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2001, 211, 97. (b) Furue,
M.; Ishibashi, M.; Satoh, A.; Oguni, T.; Maruyama, K.; Sumi, K. Coord.
Chem. ReV. 2000, 208, 103. (c) Tyson, D. S.; Luman, C. R.; Zhou, X. L.;
Castellano, F. N. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 40, 4063. (d) Walters, K. A.; Trouillet,
L.; Guillerez, S.; Schanze, K. S. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 5496. (e) Hu, Y.
Z.; Tsukiji, S.; Shinkai, S.; Oishi, S.; Hamachi, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 241. (f) Luo, J.; Reddy, K. B.; Salameh, A. S.; Wishart, J. F.; Isied,
S. S. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 2321. (g) Stemp, E. D. A.; Holmlin, R. E.;
Barton, J. K. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2000, 297, 88. (h) Furue, M.; Maruyama,
K.; Kanematsu, Y.; Kushida, T.; Kamachi, M. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1994,
132, 201.
(9) (a) Patterson, B. T.; Foley, F. M.; Richards, D.; Keene, F. R. J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. 2003, 4, 709. (b) Keene, F. R. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1998,
27, 185. (c) Fletcher, N. C.; Junk, P. C.; Reitsma, D. A.; Keene, F. R. J.
Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1998, 133. (d) Fletcher, N. C.; Keene, F. R. J.
Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1999, 683. (e) Patterson, B. T.; Keene, F. R.
Inorg. Chem. 1998, 37, 645.
(6) Qi, Y.; Desjardins, P.; Birau, M,; Wu, X.; Wang, Z. Y. Chin. J. Polym.
Sci. 2003, 21, 147.
4520
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 24, 2004