C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Catalytic Asymmetric Propargylation of Ketonesa
Acknowledgment. Financial support was provided by a Grant-
in-Aid for Young Scientists (S) from JSPS. L.-W.X. and K.O. thank
JSPS for research fellowships.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
characterization of the products, ligand optimization, and theoretical
support for the nonconventional hydrogen bonding. This material is
References
(1) Phosphorus Ligands in Asymmetric Catalysis; Bo¨rner, A., Ed.; Wiley-
VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2008.
(2) (a) Trost, B. M.; Jiang, C. Synthesis 2006, 369. (b) Riant, O.; Hannedouche,
J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 873. (c) Hatano, M.; Ishihara, K. Synthesis
2008, 1647.
(3) For examples, see: (a) Reetz, M.; Mehler, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000,
39, 3889. (b) van den Berg, M.; Minnaard, A. J.; Schudde, E. P.; van Esch,
J.; de Vries, A. H. M.; de Vries, J. G.; Feringa, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 11539. (c) Clark, T. P.; Landis, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 11792. (d) Kno¨pfel, T. F.; Aschwanden, P.; Ichikawa, T.; Watanabe,
T.; Carreira, E. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5971. (e) Takacs,
J. M.; Reddy, D. S.; Moteki, S. A.; Wu, D.; Palencia, H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2004, 126, 4494. (f) Chen, W.; Mbafor, W.; Roberts, S. M.; Whittall,
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3922. (g) Weis, M.; Waloch, C.; Seiche,
W.; Breit, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4188. (h) Liu, Y.; Sandoval,
C. A.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Z.; Kato, K.; Ding, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14212. (i) Hattori, G.; Hori, T.; Miyake, Y.;
Nishibayashi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12930. (j) Wakabayashi,
K.; Aikawa, K.; Kawauchi, S.; Mikami, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
5012. (k) Yu, J.; RajanBabu, T. V.; Parquette, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 7845. (l) Patureau, F. W.; de Boer, S.; Kuil, M.; Meeuwissen,
J.; Breuil, P. R.; Siegler, M. A.; Spek, A. L.; Sandee, A. J.; de Bruin, B.;
Reek, J. N. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6683.
a Standard conditions are shown in the scheme. Isolated yields and
enantiomeric excesses determined by chiral HPLC are summarized.
b Using 5 mol % catalyst. c The absolute configuration was determined
as shown.
(4) (a) Wada, R.; Oisaki, K.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 8910. (b) Kanai, M.; Wada, R.; Shibuguchi, T.; Shibasaki, M.
Pure Appl. Chem. 2008, 80, 1055.
(5) For other examples of catalytic asymmetric allylation of ketones, see: (a)
Casolari, S.; D’Addario, D.; Tagliavini, E. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1061. (b)
Hanawa, H.; Kii, S.; Maruoka, K. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343, 57. (c)
Cunningham, A.; Woodward, S. Synlett 2002, 43. (d) Waltz, K. M.;
Gavenonis, J.; Walsh, P. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3697. (e)
Teo, Y.-C.; Goh, J.-D.; Loh, T.-P. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2743. (f) Wadamoto,
M.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14556. (g) Lou, S.;
Moquist, P. N.; Schaus, S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12660. (h)
Zhang, X.; Chen, D.; Liu, X.; Feng, X. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 5227. (i)
Miller, J. J.; Sigman, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2752. (j)
Schneider, U.; Ueno, M.; Kobayashi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
13824. (k) Itoh, J.; Han, S. B.; Krische, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 6313. (l) Barnett, D. S.; Moquist, P. N.; Schaus, S. E. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8679. (m) Huang, X.-R.; Chen, C.; Lee, G.-H.; Peng,
S.-M. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 3089.
Figure 1. (a) X-ray crystal structure of the CuOAc ·H2O-8 complex. (b)
Its chemical description.
were produced with high enantioselectivity from a range of ketones.
The reaction proceeded with perfect regioselectivity (γ-addition),
and the corresponding allenyl alcohol isomers (R-adducts) were
not detected in any case. Because of the synthetic versatility of
terminal alkynes, various product conversions, such as Sonogashira
coupling and one-pot Huisgen cycloaddition with azides (using the
same Cu catalyst),11 were possible.8 Therefore, this reaction
produces a synthetically independent family of chiral building
blocks for allylation. To our knowledge, this is the first catalytic
enantioselective propargylation of ketones.
To gain preliminary insight into the origin of the high catalytic
activity and enantioselectivity of the CuOAc-8 complex, we
elucidated the X-ray crystal structure of the complex (Figure 1).12
The central 13-membered macrocycle forms a conformationally
rigid folded structure in which the linker aromatic group overhangs
the chiral bisaminal bicyclo[3.3.0] system. The observed bite angle
is extraordinarily wide (∠P-Cu-P ) 137.8°), resulting in the
stabilization of the catalytically active monomeric Cu complex.8,13
In addition, the oxygen atom of the acetate ligand forms noncon-
ventional C-H· · ·O hydrogen bonds with the bisaminal protons,14
leading to a distortion of the tetrahedral geometry around the copper
atom. The relevance of this distorted geometry and hydrogen-
bonding ability to the enantioselectivity and high catalytic activity
is currently under investigation.
(6) Russo, V.; Herron, J. R.; Ball, Z. T. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 220.
(7) Cu(I) salts conjugated with a hard anion (e.g., F-, RO-, RCO2-) generally
promoted the allylation reaction without affecting the enantioselectivity.
Preparation of the asymmetric catalyst was simpler using CuOAc (simple
mixing with an approximately equimolar amount of the chiral phosphine)
than CuF [reduction of CuF2 using 2 equiv of the chiral phosphine relative
to Cu (see ref 4a)]. The catalytic activity of CuF, however, was generally
higher than that of CuOAc.
(8) See the Supporting Information (SI) for details.
(9) When iPr-DuPHOS and xantphos were used under the current optimized conditions,
the product yields were markedly lower (less than 5% for 1a) than when 8 was
used. Moreover, no detectable amount of product was obtained in propargylation
using CuOAc-iPr-DuPHOS or -xantphos catalyst.
(10) Enantioselective propargylation of ketones depended on the use of
stoichiometric amounts of chiral sources. See: (a) Justicia, J.; Sancho-Sanz,
´
I.; Alvarez-Manzaneda, E.; Oltra, J. E.; Cuerva, J. M. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2009, 351, 2295. (b) Hernandez, E.; Burgos, C. H.; Alicea, E.; Soderquist,
J. A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4089.
(11) Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 2004.
(12) Use of the crystal as an asymmetric catalyst produced results comparable
to those for the in situ-prepared CuOAc-8 complex.
(13) (a) A clear dependence of the catalytic activity on the aggregation state of
the Cu-bisphosphine (8, iPr-DuPHOS, xantphos) complexes was observed
(see the SI for details). (b) Sterically bulky phosphines markedly enhance
the reactivity of Cu-catalyzed hydrosilylation reactions by stabilizing active
monomeric catalysts. For examples, see: Deutsch, C.; Krause, N.; Lipshutz,
B. H. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108, 2916.
(14) For examples of C-H · · · O hydrogen bonding, see: (a) Vargas, R.; Garza,
J.; Dixon, D. A.; Hay, B. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4750. (b) Corey,
E. J.; Lee, T. W. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1321. (c) C-H · · · O hydrogen-
bond formation in the CuOAc-8 complex was also supported by density
functional theory calculations (see the SI). (d) The crystal structure of the
CuOAc-5 complex did not contain H2O, but the C-H· · ·O hydrogen bond
still existed (see the SI).
In conclusion, we have identified new modular chiral phosphines
that are effective for Cu(I)-catalyzed asymmetric allylation and
propargylation of ketones. Studies directed toward obtaining a more
detailed understanding of the enantiodifferentiation mechanism and
extending the utility of the new phosphines to other catalytic
asymmetric reactions are in progress.
JA101948S
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 19, 2010 6639