The spatially oriented chromophoric indigo core unit serves as
a molecular probe. The difference of the blue domain types becomes
obvious by examination with only one polarizer due to their direc-
tional opposed dichroism (Fig. 3b). As shown in Fig. 3d (arrow)
a blue spherulite can be composed of blue domains of either orien-
tation. The dichroism of the red domains is more pronounced and
always shows the highest absorption parallel to the polarizer
(Fig. 3d).
and thus to textures as in the case of 1. Further studies, especially
X-ray investigations, to clarify the molecular architecture of these
interesting mesophases, displaying those unusual textures, are in
progress.
Notes and references
€
1 S. Laschat, A. Baro, N. Steinke, F. Giesselmann, C. Hagele, G. Scalia,
R. Judele, E. Kapatsina, S. Sauer, A. Schreivogel and M. Tosoni,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 4832–4887.
2 G. P. Crawford and R. H. Hurt, in Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and
Nanotechnology, ed. H. S. Nalwa, American Scientific Publishers,
2004, pp. 879–905.
The situation with three distinct domain types in which two are
complementary is reminiscent again of a texture so far exclusively
observed for bent-core mesogens, here the B2 phase. In the B2 phase
the complementary domains are synclinic enantiomeric arrange-
ments, while the third type of domains is formed by an anticlinic
racemic assembly. The bent molecular shape together with the tilt of
the molecules within the layers of the B2 phase generates a chiral
situation, which can be switched upon application of an electric
field.9,13 Since the indigo derivative 2 is centrosymmetric and therefore
non-polar a likewise phase architecture is not necessarily chiral. By
application of an electric field therefore a switching event was not be
observed.
^
3 J. Malthete, A. M. Levelut and N. H. Tinh, J. Phys., Lett., 1985, 46,
875–880.
^
4 J. Malthete, H. T. Nguyen and C. Destrade, Liq. Cryst., 1993, 13,
171–187.
5 B. Donnio, B. Heinrich, H. Allouchi, J. Kain, S. Diele, D. Guillon and
D. W. Bruce, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 15258–15268.
6 A. R. Katritzky, W. Q. Fan, A. E. Koziol and G. J. Palenik,
J. Heterocycl. Chem., 1989, 26, 821–828.
7 I. Sakurai, Y. Kawamura, T. Sakurai, A. Ikegami and T. Seto, Mol.
Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 1985, 130, 203–222.
€
8 N. Usol’tseva, K. Praefcke, D. Singer and B. Gundogan, Liq. Cryst.,
1994, 16, 601–616.
9 R. A. Reddy and C. Tschierske, J. Mater. Chem., 2006, 16, 907–961.
10 G. Pelzl, S. Diele, A. Jakli, C. Lischka, I. Wirth and W. Weissflog, Liq.
Cryst., 1999, 26, 135–139.
In conclusion we presented the two new phasmidic indigo meso-
gens 1 and 2 representing the first examples of liquid crystalline indigo
derivatives. Their unusual optical features remind of the textures of
the B7- or B2-phase, respectively, found for some bent-core meso-
gens. Differences can be observed upon the reaction on an applied
electric field. Besides some rare examples in which a biaxial nematic
phase is claimed14–16 phasmidic mesogens only form columnar pha-
ses.4,5,17 Therefore it is reasonable to assume a columnar type of phase
here as well, most likely of oblique geometry. The strong core-core
interactions demanded for Colob-phases1 might originate from the
central H-bond donator acceptor system or from the intramolecular
push-pull situation of the chromophore leading to strong interactions
between adjacent molecules, e.g. in terms of Coulomb or charge-
transfer interactions. Since both 1 and 2 are centrosymmetric but
non-polar we suggest that the steric interactions of the wing groups
may cause a manipulating force for the formation of the columnar
phases leading to some kind of sterically induced splay deformations
11 A. Jakli, C. Lischka, W. Weissflog, G. Pelzl and A. Saupe, Liq. Cryst.,
2000, 27, 1405–1409.
12 D. A. Coleman, J. Fernsler, N. Chattham, M. Nakata, Y. Takanishi,
E. Korblova, D. R. Link, R. F. Shao, W. G. Jang, J. E. Maclennan,
O. Mondainn-Monval, C. Boyer, W. Weissflog, G. Pelzl, L. C. Chien,
J. Zasadzinski, J. Watanabe, D. M. Walba, H. Takezoe and
N. A. Clark, Science, 2003, 301, 1204–1211.
13 D. R. Link, G. Natale, R. Shao, J. E. Maclennan, N. A. Clark,
E. Korblova and D. M. Walba, Science, 1997, 278, 1924–1927.
€
14 S. M. Fan, I. D. Fletcher, B. Gundogan, N. J. Heaton, G. Kothe,
G. R. LuckhurstandK. Praefcke, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1993, 204, 517–523.
15 S. Chandrasekhar, G. G. Nair, D. S. S. Rao, S. K. Prasad,
K. Praefcke and D. Blunk, Liq. Cryst., 1998, 24, 67–70.
16 P. Berdague, M. Munier, P. Judeinstein, J. P. Bayle, C. S. Nagaraja
and K. V. Ramanathan, Liq. Cryst., 1999, 26, 211–218.
^
17 H. T. Nguyen, C. Destrade and J. Malthete, Adv. Mater., 1997, 9,
375–388.
2958 | J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 2956–2958
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010