not successful. The reaction was hampered by the formation
of HI, which causes cleavage of the B(OH)2 group to provide
the iodoarene. While the halogenation of aromatic compounds
is one of the most widely studied reactions in the literature,14
a practical iodination of arylboronic acids to access iodinated
arylboronic acids has not been reported. Herein, we report a
convenient and effective method for mild and regioselective
iodination and bromination of free arylboronic acids. This
method provides the ortho-halogenated products in moderate
to high yield (43%-95%). The reaction is operationally simple,
requires no heating or cooling, and is easy to workup to provide
crude products in high purity. Moreover, the silver reagent can
easily be recycled from the reaction mixture as AgI or AgBr,
which can be used for other reactions.15
We initiated this project by looking for a mild and
convenient iodination agent. There have been a number of
reports on direct aromatic iodination;16 however, few Lewis
acids have been examined. The most common Lewis acids
are silver and mercuric salts in combination with I2 due to
the fact that silver and mercury can remove iodide efficiently
from solution by precipitation. We decided to explore
conditions with different solvents using 3-methoxyphenyl-
boronic acid as a model substrate. First, a combination of
silver sulfate and iodine was utilized as an iodinating agent
at room temperature. A brief optimization of solvent revealed
that ethanol and 1,2-ethanediol were the most suitable
solvents for the desired transformation. The iodine color
disappeared within a few minutes to provide the desired
product without ipso deboronation side product (Table 1,
entries 4 and 5). All other solvents were found to be
unsuitable for this reaction (Table 1, entries 1-3). Using
ethanol as a solvent, we examined the influence of different
reagents on iodination of 3-methoxyphenylboronic acid to
further establish the reaction conditions. We found that when
a mixture of Hg(OAc)2/I2 was used instead of Ag2SO4/I2 the
yield of ortho-iodination product 3 decreased and formation
of 10-15% of the ipso-iodination was observed (Table 1,
entry 7). Using AgNO3/I2 led to a similar result as Ag2SO4/
I2 (Table 1, entry 6). No ortho-iodination was observed with
NIS (Table 1, entry 8), while NIS in acetonitrile gave only
the ipso-iododeboronation product in excellent yield (Table
1, entry 9). Furthermore, when the reaction times exceed 3
min, further decomposition occurred, and less ortho-iodina-
tion product 3 was observed.
Figure 1. Structure of AN-2690 (5-fluoro-1,3-dihydro-1-hydroxy-
2,1-benzoxaborole) (1) and ortho-iodophenylboronic acid (2).
also identified as a priority research area by the American
Chemical Society (ACS) Green Chemistry Institute (GCI) and
several leading global pharmaceutical corporations.8 Conse-
quently, the development of efficient amidation methods with
high atom economy continues to be an important scientific
pursuit. In 2008, Hall and co-workers described the remarkable
activity of ortho-halophenylboronic acids as very active and
mild catalysts toward cycloaddition reactions and direct amide
bond formation at ambient temperature.4c ortho-Iodophenyl-
boronic acid 2 (Figure 1) is the most active of the ortho-
haloarylboronic acids. With an aim toward optimizing this
catalyst, we sought to develop new methods that would provide
a variety of substituted ortho-iodoarylboronic acids.
Even though arylboronic acids have been available for several
years, are easy to handle, and are relatively stable, they are
susceptible to chemoselectivity issues that render them difficult
to further derivatization after introduction of the boronic acid.
Their Lewis acidic nature makes them prone to react with
commonly used organic reagents such as strong acids, bases,
oxidants, and metal salts. This reactivity typically causes a
simple protodeboronation or an ipso substitution of the boronic
acid group, thus forming other products such as haloarenes,9
amidoarenes,10 and nitroarenes.11 These transformations are
believed to proceed via boron activation followed by an ipso
displacement mechanism. As a result of this reactivity, boronic
acids are rarely left intact after being carried through a number
of synthetic chemical reactions.12 Although direct bromination
and chlorination of arylboronic acids have been reported by
Kuivila and co-workers in 1962,13 their direct iodination was
(5) (a) Suzuki, A. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 147–168. (b)
Miyaura, N.; Suzuki, A. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 2457–2483.
(6) (a) Kumar, S.; Kimball, A. B. Expert Opin. InVest. Drugs 2009, 18
(6), 727–734. (b) Baker, S. J.; Zhang, Y. K.; Akama, T.; Lau, A.; Zhou,
H.; Hernandez, V.; Mao, W.; Alley, M. R. K.; Sanders, V.; Plattner, J. J.
J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 4447–4450.
(7) (a) Miyaura, N.; Yanagi, T.; Suzuki, A. Synth. Commun. 1981, 11,
513. (b) Lam, P. Y. S.; Clark, C. G.; Saubern, S.; Adams, J.; Winters, M. P.;
Chan, D. M. T.; Combs, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2941–2944. (c)
Hall, D. G. Synlett 2007, 1644–1655. (d) Lachance, H.; Hall, D. G. Organic
Reactions; Denmark, S. E., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 2009; Vol. 73. (e)
Petasis, N. A.; Zavialov, I. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 445–446. (f)
Beenen, M. A.; Weix, D. J.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
6304–6305.
The best yield of ortho-iodination product was obtained
when 1.1 equiv of Ag2SO4 or AgNO3 was used with 1.0
equiv of I2 (Table 1, entry 10). The reaction also worked
well on a multigram scale (Table 1, entry 12). Although the
stoichiometric use of metal salts should be avoided as much
as possible, it is tolerable for transformations that provide
(8) Constable, D. J. C.; Dunn, P. J.; Hayler, J. D.; Humphrey, G. R.;
Leazer Jr, J. L.; Linderman, R. J.; Lorenz, K.; Manley, J.; Pearlman, B. A.;
Wells, A.; Zaks, A.; Zhang, T. Y. Green Chem. 2007, 9, 411–420.
(9) (a) Furuya, T.; Ritter, T. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2860–2863. (b) Furuya,
T.; Kaiser, H. M.; Ritter, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5993–5996.
(c) Cazorla, C.; Me´tay, E.; Andrioletti, B.; Lemaire, M. Terahedron Lett.
2009, 50, 3936–3938. (d) Sniady, A. Synlett 2006, 960–961. (e) Thiebes,
C.; Prakash, G. K. S.; Petasis, N. A.; Olah, G. A. Synlett 1998, 141–142.
(10) Prakash, G. K. S.; Moran, M. D.; Mathew, T.; Olah, G. A. J.
Fluorine Chem. 2009, 130 (9), 806–809.
(12) For notable exceptions, see: (a) Mothana, S.; Grassot, J.-M.; Hall,
D. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 2883–2887. (b) Mothana, S.; Chahal,
N.; Vanneste, S.; Hall, D. G. J. Comb. Chem. 2007, 9, 193–196.
(13) Kuivila, H. G.; Benjamin, L. E.; Murphy, C. J.; Price, A. D.; Polevy,
J. H. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 825–829.
(14) Johnsson, R.; Meijer, A.; Ellervik, U. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 11657–
11663.
(15) (a) Shen, Z.; Yeo, Y.; Loh, T. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 3922–
3924. (b) Wei, C.; Li, Z.; Li, C. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4473–4475.
(16) Merkushev, E. B. Synthesis 1988, 923–937.
(11) Prakash, G. K. S.; Panja, C.; Mathew, T.; Surampudi, V.; Petasis,
N. A.; Olah, G. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2205–2207.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 11, 2010
2481