Table 1. Optimization of the KA2-Coupling Conditionsa
entry
1a/2a/3a (mmol)
cat. (mol %)
time (min)
conditions
yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1:1.2:1.2
1:1:1.2
CuI (20)
CuI (20)
CuI (20)
CuI (20)
CuI (20)
CuI (20)
CuI (20)
CuI (20)
CuI (10)
CuBr (20)
25
25
25
25
25
25
20h
15
25
25
neat, MW, 100 °C
neat, MW, 100 °C
neat, MW, 100 °C
neat, MW, 80 °C
neat, MW, 120 °C
toluene, MW, 100 °C
toluene, conv, 100 °C
neat, MW, 100 °C
neat, MW, 100 °C
neat, MW, 100 °C
51c
61
76
43
62
54
59
54
63
72
1.2:1:1.2
1.2:1:1.2
1.2:1:1.2
1.2:1:1.2
1.2:1:1.2
1.2:1:1.2
1.2:1:1.2
1.2:1:1.2
10
a When the reaction was run under microwave irradiation a maximum power of 80 W was used. b Isolated yields based on 4-methoxybenzylamine.
c Isolated yield based on cyclohexanone.
tertiary propargylamines. Primary amines are considered as
being difficult substrates thus, limiting access to secondary
propargylamines.8 However, these amines are potent syn-
thetic intermediates for the synthesis of pyrroles,9 quino-
lines,10 and oxazolidinones.11 Recently, we have reported
an optimized protocol for the synthesis of secondary alky-
lpropargylamines via a microwave-assisted A3-coupling
reaction.12 We were rather surprised to found that the
aldehyde could be replaced by a ketone in this process,
as to the best of our knowledge, there are no examples in
the literature describing the application of ketones in the
A3 coupling. Herein, we report an unprecedented Cu(I)-
catalyzed coupling of a ketone, an alkyne, and a primary
amine. We will call this novel three-component reaction
a KA2 coupling.
(Table 1, entry 5). Solventless conditions proved to be most
suitable for the reaction as the use of toluene resulted in a
substantially decreased yield of 54% (Table 1, entry 6). When
the reaction in toluene was conducted under conventional
heating at the same temperature, the desired propargylamine
4a was obtained in a comparable moderate yield of 59%
after an extended reaction time of 20 h (Table 1, entry 7). A
shorter irradiation time of 15 min (Table 1, entry 8) or a
diminished concentration of the CuI catalyst to 10 mol %
(Table 1, entry 9) all resulted in lower yields. The application
of CuBr instead of CuI delivered compound 4a in a
comparable yield (Table 1, entries 3 and 10).
The scope of the reaction was evaluated for various
ketones, primary amines, and alkynes applying the optimal
conditions (Table 1, entry 3). Both aromatic and aliphatic
alkynes were explored as reaction partners, but the last
afforded the target compounds 4e,f only in low to moderate
yields (Table 2, entries 5 and 6), even when 2 equiv of alkyne
was used. To expand the scope of the protocol, a variety of
primary amines was evaluated. All reactions seemed to be
working well when 6-membered (hetero)cyclic ketones were
used. When cyclohexanone (1a) was used, the desired
compounds 4a-d,g-l were obtained in 46-82% yield
(Table 2, entries 1-4 and 7-12). When N-protected pip-
eridinones 1b-e were used, yields between 38% and 82%
were obtained (Table 2, entries 13-16). 2-Methylcyclohex-
anone (1f) delivered the adducts 4q (mixture of diastereomers
(10:1)) in only 33% yield (Table 2, entry 17), clearly showing
that sterical hindrance might play an important role for the
yield of the reaction. The fact that 3-methylcyclohexanone
(1g) is working well (Table 2, entry 18) confirms this
conclusion. It seemed that also conformational factors are
playing a crucial role in this process, as when cycloheptanone
(1h) was used the yield dropped to 21% (Table 2, entry 19).
It is probably that ketimines from 6-membered (hetero)cyclic
ketones (see the mechanism bellow) are more accessible for
The reaction conditions of the KA2 coupling were opti-
mized using cyclohexanone 1a, 4-methoxybenzylamine 2a,
and phenylacetylene 3a (Table 1). When a (1:1.2:1.2) mixture
of the respective compounds together with 20 mol % of CuI
catalyst was irradiated under solventless conditions at a
ceiling temperature of 100 °C and a maximum power of 80
W for 25 min, the desired propargylamine 4a could be
isolated in 51% yield (Table 1, entry 1). Changing the relative
amounts of the three components it was found that the
optimal ratio was (1.2:1:1.2) providing the desired compound
in 76% yield (Table 1, entries 1-3). A lower reaction
temperature of 80 °C reduced the yield of the propargylamine
4a to 43% (Table 1, entry 4), while increasing the temper-
ature to 120 °C also resulted in a decreased yield of 62%
due to the formation of several unidentified byproducts
(8) (a) Giles, R. L.; Sullivan, J. D.; Steiner, A. M.; Looper, R. E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3116. (b) Mont, N.; Mehta, V. P.; Appukkuttan,
P.; Beryozkina, T.; Toppet, S.; Van Hecke, K.; Van Meervelt, L.; Voet,
A.; DeMaeyer, M.; Van der Eycken, E. V. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7509.
(9) Bremner, W. S.; Organ, M. G. J. Comb. Chem. 2008, 10, 142.
(10) Kuninobu, Y.; Inoue, Y.; Takai, K. Chem. Lett. 2007, 36, 1422.
(11) Yoo, W. J.; Li, C. J. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1503.
(12) Bariwal, J. B.; Ermolat’ev, D. S.; Van der Eycken, E. V.
Chem.sEur. J. 2010, 16, 3281.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 11, 2010
2639