Y. Wu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 2577–2581
2581
14. Katamreddy, S. R.; Caldwell, D. R.; Heyer, D.; Samano, V.; Thompson, J. B.;
Carpenter, A. J.; Conlee, C. R.; Boros, E. E.; Thompson, B. D. WO2008008887,
2008.
15. Fang, J.; Tang, J.; Carpenter, A. J.; Peckham, G.; Conlee, C. R.; Du, K. S.;
Katamreddy, S. R. WO2008070692, 2008.
16. Alper, P.; Azimioara, M.; Cow, C.; Epple, R.; Jiang, S.; Lelais, G.; Michellys, P.;
Mutnick, D.; Nikulin, V.; Westcott-Baker, L. WO2009038974, 2009.
17. The assay consists of CHO-K1 6CRE-luciferase cells that stably express human
GPR119 receptor plated at 15,000 cells/well in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle
Medium: Nutrient Mixture F12 (DMEM/F12), 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS),
alkylsulfonamide and isopropylcarbamate end groups showed
potent GPR119 receptor activity. However, the pharmacokinetic
profiles of compounds screened in this series, exemplified by com-
pound 19, were not optimal. Compound 19 possessed relatively
low exposure (AUC0–24) and a short half-life. Further efforts are
being focused on designing compounds with better pharmacoki-
netic profiles as GPR119 agonists for the treatment of type 2
diabetes.
2 mM
media is removed by aspiration and replaced with 20
-glutamine (no FBS) utilizing a Matrix Multidrop. Test compounds (20
then pipetted into the assay plate using a Packard Minitrak. The plates are then
incubated for 5 h at 37 °C. Under subdued light conditions, 15 L of a 1:1
L
-glutamine in black 384-well assay plates. On the following day, the
L of DMEM/F12, 2 mM
L) are
l
L
l
References and notes
l
1. Soga, T.; Ohishi, T.; Matsui, T.; Saito, T.; Matsumoto, M.; Takasaki, J.;
Matsumoto, S.; Kamohara, M.; Hiyama, H.; Yoshida, S.; Momose, K.; Ueda, Y.;
Matsushime, H.; Kobori, M.; Furuichi, K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005,
326, 744.
2. Sakamoto, Y.; Inoue, H.; Kawakami, S.; Miyawaki, K.; Miyamoto, T.; Mizuta, K.;
Itakura, M. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 351, 474.
3. Chu, Z.-L.; Jones, R. M.; He, H.; Carrol, C.; Gutierrez, V.; Lucman, A.; Moloney,
M.; Gao, H.; Mondala, H.; Bagnol, D.; Unett, D.; Liang, Y.; Demarest, K.; Semple,
G.; Behan, D. P.; Leonard, J. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 2601.
4. Chu, Z.-L.; Carrol, C.; Alfonso, J.; Gutierrez, V.; He, H.; Lucman, A.; Pedraza, M.;
Mondala, H.; Gao, H.; Bagnol, D.; Chen, R.; Jones, R. M.; Behan, D. P.; Leonard, J.
Endocrinology 2008, 149, 2038.
solution containing SteadyLite™ and Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline
with 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2 is added to the plates using a Matrix
Multidrop. Plates are then sealed with self-adhesive clear plate seals and the
amount of luciferase generated is quantified in
a Wallac Viewlux™.
Compounds are also tested in the same manner against cells without the
GPR119 receptor so as to check for false positives.
18. All compounds are referenced to
a small molecule GPR119 agonist for
evaluation of intrinsic efficacy (%max response) since this reporter assay is
not sensitive enough to demonstrate robust activity of putative endogenous
ligands (OEA, LPC, etc.). Our experience with the ꢁ3000 compounds made for
the program is that compounds with ꢁ80–200%max response are likely full
agonists. Compounds with consistent levels of receptor activation below 80%
may be partial agonists. The degree of variability in the assay accounts for the
large range considered as full agonists. The structure of our standard
5. Ning, Y.; O’Neill, K.; Lan, H.; Pang, L.; Shan, L. X.; Hawes, B. E.; Hedrick, J. A. Br. J.
Pharmacol. 2008, 155, 1056.
6. Overton, H. A.; Babbs, A. J.; Doel, S. M.; Fyfe, M. C. T.; Gardner, L. S.; Griffin, G.;
Jackson, H. C.; Procter, M. J.; Rasamison, C. M.; Tang-Christensen, M.;
Widdowson, P. S.; Williams, G. M.; Reynet, C. Cell Metab. 2006, 3, 167.
7. Lan, H.; Vassileva, G.; Corona, A.; Liu, L.; Baker, H.; Golovko, A.; Abbondanzo, S.
J.; Hu, W.; Yang, S.; Ning, Y.; Del Vecchio, R. A.; Poulet, F.; Laverty, M.;
Gustafson, E. L.; Hedrick, J. A.; Kowalski, T. J. Endocrinology 2009, 201, 219.
8. Semple, G.; Fioravanti, B.; Pereira, G.; Calderon, I.; Uy, J.; Choi, K.; Xiong, Y.; Ren,
A.; Morgan, M.; Dave, V.; Thomsen, W.; Unett, D. J.; Xing, C.; Bossie, S.; Carroll,
C.; Chu, Z. L.; Grottick, A. J.; Hauser, E. K.; Leonard, J.; Jones, R. M. J. Med. Chem.
2008, 51, 5172.
compound 40, with an EC50 = 0.2 lM (max response = 100%), is shown below.
This compound is reported19 to have an EC50 = 0.13
lM in a cAMP assay.
N
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
NO2
9. Fyfe, M. C. T.; McCormack, J. G.; Overton, H. A.; Procter, M. J.; Reynet, C. Expert
Opin. Drug Discov. 2008, 3, 403.
10. Fyfe, M. C. T.; Overton, H. A.; Procter, M. J.; Reynet, C.; White, J. R. Annu. Rep.
Med. Chem. 2007, 42, 129.
S
N
40
11. Arena Pharmaceutical press release, Dec 15, 2008, San Diego, California.
12. Prosidion Pharmaceutical press release, Sep 3, 2008, Melville, NY.
13. Metabolex press release, Nov 12, 2008, Hayward, California.
19. Jones, R. M.; Graeme, S.; Fioravanti, B.; Pereira, G.; Calderon, I.; UY, J.; Duvvuri,
K.; Choi, J. S. K.; Xiong, Y.; Dave, V. WO2004065380, 2004.