citrinadin architecture by a merger of a functionalized
piperidine intermediate of type 2 with a three-carbon, “double
annulation” reagent 3 having electrophilic reactivity at the
terminal carbons and nucleophilic reactivity at the middle
carbon. This would be a pairing by complementary reactivity,
and it was our hope that we could identify an appropriate
reagent with the characteristics of the hypothetical construct
3. Implicit in this analysis was the assumption that an attack
of a nitro-stabilized anion on the keto group of 2 might be
reversible, thus potentially allowing control over the problem
of establishing the required relative stereochemistry at
carbons a and b, and that the methylamino group of citrinadin
B could be elaborated from a nitro group.
intrigued by the possibility that structurally rigid and
functionalized bicycles of the type shown as 8 (Scheme 2)
might arise by simple unions of compound 4 with ketones
flanked on both sides by nucleophilic atoms (e.g., 5). This
type of double cyclization could conceivably proceed by a
mechanism involving the following sequence of bond forma-
tions: (1) an intermolecular conjugate addition reaction with
concomitant elimination of pivaloate ion, (2) a ring-forming
conjugate addition reaction, and (3) a final transannular
carbonyl addition. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility
of this scheme as a strategy for directly generating densely
functionalized, bicyclic compounds from acyclic inputs.
Rigid, functionalized molecules of type 8 have genuine value
in the construction of compound libraries.11
Our initial target was a bicyclo[3.3.0]octane framework
of type 8 (n ) 1; Nu ) aminoalkyl) because a double
cyclization, if it occurred, would produce a single diastere-
oisomer due to the well-known thermodynamic bias for a
cis ring fusion in [3.3.0] bicycles.12 In our search for reactants
of type 5, we encountered the symmetrical diaminoketone
9.13 When the bis-hydrochloride salt of this compound was
allowed to react with the NPP reagent 4 under the conditions
shown in Scheme 3, cis-fused bicyclic nitro alcohol 10 was
In the course of contemplating a suitable laboratory
surrogate for a reactive species having the properties of 3,
we encountered the 2-nitro-3-pivaloyloxypropene (NPP)
reagent 4 (Scheme 2) introduced by Seebach and Knochel.6,9
Scheme 2. Concept for “Double Cyclization”
Scheme 3
.
Direct Synthesis of Bicycle 10 and Chemical Proof
of Relative Stereochemistry
This three-carbon compound was shown to be a reactive
conjunctive or “linchpin” reagent1-6,10 to which new bonds
may be readily made to the terminal carbon atoms.
At the outset of our studies, uses of compound 4 as a
double-cyclization reagent were not described. We were
produced and isolated in 83% yield.14 The value of Seebach’s
NPP reagent for the facile production of three new bonds in
the course of a simple union was thus demonstrated.
Experimental support for the cis ring fusion shown in 10
was obtained by the outcome of the following sequence of
transformations: (1) a complete reduction of the nitro group
in compound 10 with Raney nickel in an atmosphere of
hydrogen and (2) conversion of the resulting amino alcohol
11 to carbamate 12 by the action of phosgene. The production
of 12 would be possible only if the amino and hydroxyl
groups in 11 were situated on the same side of the molecular
plane.
(9) Knochel, P.; Seebach, D. NouV. J. Chim. 1981, 5, 75. (b) Knochel,
P.; Seebach, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 34, 3223. (c) Seebach, D.; Knochel,
P. HelV. Chim. Acta 1984, 67, 261. (d) Knochel, P.; Seebach, D. Synthesis
1982, 1017. (e) Knochel, P.; Seebach, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 3897.
(f) Seebach, D.; Calderari, G.; Knochel, P. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 4861
.
(10) For selected examples of conjunctive reagents (also known as
“linchpin” or “multiple coupling” reagents), see: (a) Corey, E. J.; Seebach,
D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1965, 4, 1075. (b) Seebach, D.; Corey, E. J. J.
Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 231. (c) Trost, B. M.; Vincent, J. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1980, 102, 5680. (d) Trost, B. M.; Curran, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1981, 103, 7380. (e) Trost, B. M.; Chan, D. M. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979,
101, 6429. (f) Harre, M.; Raddatz, P.; Walenta, R.; Winterfeldt, E. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1982, 21, 480. (g) For a review of tandem vicinal
difunctionalizations, see: Chapdelaine, M. J.; Hulce, M. Org. React. (N.Y.)
1990, 38, 225. (h) Piers, E.; Yeung, B. W. A.; Fleming, F. F. Can. J. Chem.
1993, 71, 280. (i) Trost, B. M.; Ghadiri, M. R. Bull. De la Soc. Chim. Fr.
1993, 130 (3), 433. (j) Hoye, T. R.; North, J. T.; Yao, L. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1994, 116, 2617. (k) Tietze, L. F.; Geissler, H.; Gewert, J. A.; Jakobi,
U. Synlett 1994, 511. (l) Smith, A. B., III.; Boldi, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 6925. (m) Lipshutz, B. H.; Bulow, G.; Fernandez-Lazaro, F.;
Kim, S.-K.; Lowe, R.; Mollard, P.; Stevens, K. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 11664. (n) Lipshutz, B. H.; Clososki, G. C.; Chrisman, W.; Chung,
D. W.; Ball, D. B.; Howell, J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4561. (o) Smith, A. B.,
III; Wuest, W. M. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5883. (p) Devarie-Baez, N. O.;
(11) (a) Carell, T.; Wintner, E. A.; Bashir-Hashemi, A.; Rebek, J., Jr.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1994, 33, 2059. (b) Carell, T.; Wintner, E. A.; Rebek,
J., Jr. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1994, 33, 2061.
(12) Wiberg, K. B. Angew. Chem. 1986, 98, 312.
(13) De Michelis, C.; Rocheblave, L.; Priem, G.; Chermann, J. C.; Kraus,
J. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2000, 8, 1253.
(14) Additional bases could also effect unions of compound 9 with NPP
reagent 4. See the Supporting Information for details.
Kim, W.-S.; Smith, A. B., III; Xian, M. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1861
.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 12, 2010
2747