ORGANIC
LETTERS
2010
Vol. 12, No. 13
3086-3089
Efficient Construction of a
3C-Xanthone-Linked 3C-Chromone
Scaffold by Novel Double Michael
Additions and Cyclizations
Fuchun Xie, Hong Chen, and Youhong Hu*
State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica,
Chinese Academy of Science, 555 Zu Chong Zhi Road, Shanghai 201203, China
Received May 13, 2010
ABSTRACT
A novel base-promoted cascade reaction of 2-methyl-3-(1-alkynyl)chromones to produce a 3C-xanthone-linked 3C-chromone scaffold has
been developed. This tandem process involves multiple reactions such as Michael additions/cyclizations under mild conditions without a
transition metal catalyst and inert atmosphere.
Tandem reactions that involve the production of multiple C-C
bonds in a single manipulation provide an efficient way to
construct complex molecules from readily available materials.1
The design of a tandem reaction from an easily prepared
ingenious intermediate with multiple reactive sites to generate
complex molecular architectures is significant and attractive,
especially for the synthesis of natural product skeletons.2 Our
group has been pursuing the diversified synthesis of natural-
product-like scaffolds through cascade reactions based on 3-(1-
alkynyl)chromone intermediates.3 The chromone moiety is well-
known as a Michael receptor.4 However, the reactivity of the
methyl group of chromone at the 2-position has rarely been
investigated. Only a few reports have mentioned that the methyl
group of 2-methyl chromone could be used in aldol condensa-
tions with electrophiles (such as aromatic aldehydes, dimethyl-
formamide dimethyl acetal, diethyl oxalate, and 4-nitrosodim-
ethylanilines) under basic conditions.5 We envisioned that the
(1) For recent reviews, see: (a) Tietze, L. F. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 115.
(b) Eilbracht, P.; Barfacker, L.; Buss, C.; Hollmann, C.; Kitsos-Rzychon,
B. E.; Kranemann, C. L.; Rische, T.; Roggenbuck, R.; Schmidt, A. Chem.
ReV. 1999, 99, 3329. (c) Ajamian, A.; Gleason, J. L. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2004, 43, 3754. (d) Wasilke, J. C.; Obrey, S. J.; Baker, R. T.; Bazan,
G. C. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 1001. (e) Enders, D.; Grondal, C.; Huttl, M. R.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 1570. (f) Guo, H. C.; Ma, J. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 354. (g) Pellissier, H. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 2143.
(h) Gorobets, E. V. M.; Mansur, S.; Valeev, F. A. Russ. Chem. ReV. 2000,
69, 1001.
(3) (a) Cheng, G.; Hu, Y. Chem. Commun. 2007, 3285. (b) Cheng, G.;
Hu, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4732. (c) Zhao, L.; Cheng, G.; Hu, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 7364. (d) Zhao, L.; Xie, F.; Cheng, G.; Hu, Y.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6520. (e) Xie, F.; Pan, X.; Lin, S.; Hu,
Y. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 1378.
(4) For recent examples, see: (a) Ibrahim, M. A. ArkiVoc 2008, 192. (b)
Sosnovskikh, V.; Irgashev, R.; Moshkin, V.; Kodess, M. Russ. Chem. Bull.
2008, 57, 2146. (c) Sosnovskikh, V. Y.; Irgashev, R. A.; Kodess, M. I.
Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 2997. (d) Sosnovskikh, V. Y.; Moshkin, V. S.;
Kodess, M. I. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 7877. (e) Sosnovskikh, V. Y.; Moshkin,
V. S.; Irgashev, R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 8543. (f) Lin, Y. D.;
Kao, J. Q.; Chen, C. T. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5195. (g) Shokol, T.; Turov, V.;
Semeniuchenko, V.; Krivokhizha, N.; Khilya, V. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd.
2006, 42, 500. (h) Gasparova, R.; Lacova, M. Molecules 2005, 10, 937.
(2) For recent reviews, see: (a) Parsons, P. J.; Penkett, C. S.; Shell, A. J.
Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 195. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Montagnon, T.; Snyder,
S. A. Chem. Commun. 2003, 551. (c) Nicolaou, K. C.; Edmonds, D. J.;
Bulger, P. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7134. (d) Tietze, L. F.;
Rackelmann, N. Pure Appl. Chem. 2004, 76, 1967. (e) Padwa, A. Pure
Appl. Chem. 2004, 76, 1933.
10.1021/ol101100d 2010 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 06/10/2010