PCEs of 2.8% and 3.7%, respectively. We anticipate that
further improvement of device performance is highly achiev-
able through carefully optimizing the processing conditions
which are ongoing in our laboratory.
This work is supported by the National Science Council and
‘‘Aim for the Top University Plan’’ of the National Chiao
Tung University and Ministry of Education, Taiwan.
Notes and references
1 (a) G. Yu, J. Gao, J. C. Hummelen, F. Wudl and A. J. Heeger,
Science, 1995, 270, 1789; (b) S. Gunes, H. Neugebauer and
Fig. 2 Cyclic voltammograms of PFDCTBT and PCDCTBT in the
thin film at a scan rate of 30 mV sÀ1
¨
N. S. Sariciftci, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 1324; (c) B. C. Thompson
.
and J. M. J. Frechet, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 58;
´
(d) Y.-J. Cheng, S.-H. Yang and C.-S. Hsu, Chem. Rev., 2009,
109, 5868.
2 (a) J. Peet, J. Y. Kim, N. E. Coates, W. L. Ma, D. Moses,
A. J. Heeger and G. C. Bazan, Nat. Mater., 2007, 6, 497;
(b) E. Zhou, M. Nakamura, T. Nishizawa, Y. Zhang, Q. Wei,
K. Tajima, C. Yang and K. Hashimoto, Macromolecules, 2008, 41,
8302; (c) J. Hou, H.-Y. Chen, S. Zhang, G. Li and Y. Yang, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 16144.
optimization, the preliminary photovoltaic performance based
on PFDCTBT already showed a Jsc of 9.5 mA cmÀ2, a Voc of
0.77 V, a fill factor (FF) of 0.38, leading to a decent PCE of
2.8%. More encouragingly, the device using PCDCTBT as the
p-type material delivered superior performance with a Jsc of
10.7 mA cmÀ2, a Voc of 0.80 V, a FF of 0.43, improving the
PCE to 3.7%.
3 (a) G. L. Schulz, X. Chen and S. Holdcroft, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2009,
94, 023302; (b) F. Zhang, W. Mammo, L. M. Andersson,
To further evaluate the hole mobility in the BHJ active
layer, hole-only devices (ITO/PEDOT:PSS/polymer:PC71BM
(1 : 2, w/w)/Au) were fabricated. It is found that the hole mobility
of the PCDCTBT/PC71BM composite (4 Â 10À4 cm2/Vs) is
higher than that of the PFDCTBT/PC71BM (5 Â 10À5 cm2/Vs)
blend under the same fabrication conditions. The enhanced
hole mobility of the PCDCTBT/PC71BM active layer might be
responsible for its better photovoltaic performance over the
PFDCTBT-based device. It is also noteworthy that the surface
roughness of the PCDCTBT/PC71BM blend observed by
AFM is larger than that of the PFDCTBT/PC71BM blend
(Fig. S4, ESIw).
S. Admassie, M. R. Andersson and O. Inganas, Adv. Mater.,
¨
2006, 18, 2169.
4 (a) J. Li, F. Dierschke, J. Wu, A. C. Grimsdale and K. Mullen,
¨
J. Mater. Chem., 2006, 16, 96; (b) N. Blouin, A. Michaud,
D. Gendron, S. Wakim, E. Blair, R. Neagu-Plesu, M. Belletete,
G. Durocher, Y. Tao and M. Leclerc, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008,
130, 732.
5 (a) E. Wang, M. Wang, L. Wang, C. Duan, J. Zhang, W. Cai,
C. He, H. Wu and Y. Cao, Macromolecules, 2009, 42, 4410;
(b) P. M. Beaujuge, W. Pisula, H. N. Tsao, S. Ellinger,
K. Mullen and J. R. Reynolds, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 7514.
¨
6 (a) M. Svensson, F. Zhang, S. C. Veenstra, W. J. H. Verhees,
J. C. Hummelen, J. M. Kroon, O. Inganas and M. R. Andersson,
¨
Adv. Mater., 2003, 15, 988; (b) Q. Zhou, Q. Hou, L. Zheng,
X. Deng, G. Yu and Y. Cao, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2004, 84, 1653;
In summary, by utilization of facile Friedel–Crafts cycli-
zation, we have successfully synthesized two well-designed
heptacyclic monomers M1 and M2 in which two outer thiophene
subunits are covalently fastened to the central 2,7-fluorene and
2,7-carbazole cores, respectively. Rigid, coplanar and electron-
rich M1 and M2 were copolymerized with the electron-
deficient benzothiadiazole acceptor by Stille coupling to afford
two novel D–A polymers PFDCTBT and PCDCTBT, respec-
tively. Through such a simple and straightforward engineering
of molecular structures, PFDCTBT and PCDCTBT simul-
taneously possess excellent solubilities for solution-processability,
low band gaps with suitable position of HOMO/LUMO
energy levels, and high hole mobilities, leading to promising
(c) F. Zhang, K. G. Jespersen, C. Bjorstrom, M. Svensson,
¨
M. R. Andersson, V. Sundstrom, K. Magnusson, E. Moons,
¨
¨
A. Yartsev and O. Inganas, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2006, 16, 667;
¨
(d) L. H. Slooff, S. C. Veenstra, J. M. Kroon, D. J. D. Moet,
J. Sweelssen and M. M. Koetse, Appl. Phys. Lett., 2007, 90,
143506.
7 (a) N. Blouin, A. Michaud and M. Leclerc, Adv. Mater., 2007, 19,
´
2295; (b) S. Wakim, S. Beaupre, N. Blouin, B.-R. Aich,
S. Rodman, R. Gaudiana, Y. Tao and M. Leclerc, J. Mater.
Chem., 2009, 19, 5351; (c) T.-Y. Chu, S. Alem, P. G. Verly,
S. Wakim, J. Lu, Y. Tao, S. Beaupre
D. Desilets, S. Rodman, D. Waller and R. Gaudiana, Appl. Phys.
Lett., 2009, 95, 063304; (d) S. H. Park, A. Roy, S. Beaupre, S. Cho,
, M. Leclerc, F. Belanger,
´ ´
´
´
N. Coates, J. S. Moon, D. Moses, M. Leclerc, K. Lee and
A. J. Heeger, Nat. Photonics, 2009, 3, 297.
8 (a) J. Roncali, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 2007, 28, 1761;
(b) C.-P. Chen, S.-H. Chan, T.-C. Chao, C. Ting and B.-T. Ko,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 12828; (c) Z. Zhu, D. Waller,
R. Gaudiana, M. Morana, D. Muhlbacher, M. Scharber and
¨
C. Brabec, Macromolecules, 2007, 40, 1981.
´
9 (a) J. L. Bredas, J. P. Calbert, D. A. da Silva Filho and J. Cornil,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2002, 99, 5804; (b) S. Ando,
J.-I. Nishida, H. Tada, Y. Inoue, S. Tokito and Y. Yamashita,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 5336; (c) N.-S. Baek, S. K. Hau,
H.-L. Yip, O. Acton, K.-S. Chen and A. K.-Y. Jen, Chem. Mater.,
2008, 20, 5734; (d) Y. Liang, Y. Wu, D. Feng, S.-T. Tsai, H.-J. Son,
G. Li and L. Yu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 56.
10 C. J. Brabec, A. Cravino, D. Meissner, N. S. Sariciftci,
T. Fromherz, M. T. Rispens, L. Sanchez and J. C. Hummelen,
Adv. Funct. Mater., 2001, 11, 374.
11 J. J. M. Halls, J. Cornil, D. A. dos Santos, R. Silbey,
´
D.-H. Hwang, A. B. Holmes, J. L. Bredas and R. H. Friend, Phys.
Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 1999, 60, 5721.
Fig.
PSS/polymer:PC71BM/Ca/Al devices under illumination of AM
1.5 G, 100 mW cmÀ2
3 Current density–voltage characteristics of ITO/PEDOT:
.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3259–3261 | 3261