B. Gabriele et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 3565–3567
3567
J.; Knight, D. W.; Menzies, M. D.; O’Halloran, M.; Tan, W.-F. Tetrahedron Lett.
2007, 48, 7709–7712; (e) Sakai, M.; Sasaki, M.; Tanino, K.; Miyashita, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 1705–1708; (f) McDonald, F. E.; Connolly, C. B.;
Gleason, M. M.; Towne, T. B.; Treiber, K. D. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 6952–6953;
(g) McDonald, F. E.; Gleason, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6648–6659; (h)
Wakabayashi, Y.; Fukuda, Y.; Shiragami, H.; Utimoto, K.; Nozaki, H. Tetrahedron
1985, 41, 3655–3661; (i) Utimoto, K.; Miwa, H.; Nozaki, H. Tetrahedron Lett.
1981, 22, 4277–4278.
CuCl2
R3
2 OH
Y
2 OH
Y
OH
YH
R2
R1
CuCl
R3
R
R1
R
R1
HCl
CuCl2
R3
HCl
H2O
H2O
R2 CuCl
HCl
CuCl2
2
6. The formation of pyrrole-2-carboxylate esters as by-products (0–29%) from N-
tosyl-2-amino-3-hydroxy-4-ynoic esters in the presence of a stoichiometric
amount of copper(I) acetate was reported some years ago: Knight, D. W.;
Sharland, C. M. Synlett 2004, 119–121.
7. The formation of pyrrole-2-carboxylate esters by acid-promoted cyclization of
N-tosyl-2-amino-3-hydroxy-4-ynoic esters (carried out in the presence of
0.5 equiv of TsOH) has been reported: Knight, D. W.; Sharland, C. M. Synlett
2003, 2258–2260.
R1
R3
Y
Scheme 1. Plausible reaction mechanism for the formation of substituted furans
and pyrroles 2 by CuCl2-catalyzed heterocyclization of 3-yne-1,2-diols and N-Boc-
or N-tosyl-1-amino-3-yn-2-ols 1.
8. The stoichiometric conversion of N-Boc-2-aminopent-4-yne-1,3-diol into N-
Boc-2-hydroxymethylpyrrole by the reaction with (THF)W(CO)5 was reported
several years ago: McDonald, F. E.; Zhu, H. Y. H. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 11061–
11068.
cyclodehydration of readily available 3-yne-1,2-diols and N-substi-
tuted 1-amino-3-yn-2-ols, catalyzed by CuCl2 under ligand-free
conditions. The possibility to obtain furan and pyrrole derivatives
starting from readily available substrates and employing a simple
and inexpensive catalyst appears particularly attractive, also in view
of the importance of these classes of heterocyclic compounds.11,12
9. Typical procedure for the CuCl2-catalyzed heterocyclodehydration of 3-yne-1,2-
diols 1a–d and N-substituted 1-amino-3-yn-2-ols 1e–g to the corresponding
furans 2a–d and pyrroles 2e–g: In a typical experiment, to a solution of 1
(1.0 mmol) in anhydrous MeOH (5.0 mL) was added CuCl2 (2.7 mg,
2.0 ꢀ 10ꢁ2 mmol, or 6.8 mg, 5 ꢀ 10ꢁ2 mmol, see Tables
1 and 2) under
nitrogen in a Schlenk flask. The resulting mixture was stirred under nitrogen
at 80 °C or 100 °C for the required time (see Tables 1 and 2). The solvent was
evaporated, and the crude products were purified by column chromatography
on silica gel (eluent: 99:1 hexane–acetone for 2a, 2b, and 2c; hexane–AcOEt
from 9:1 to 8:2 for 2e, 2f, 2g, and 2h) or neutral alumina (for 2d; eluent: 99:1
hexane–acetone) to give the pure products 2, which were fully characterized
by spectroscopic techniques and elemental analysis.10 The yields obtained in
each experiment are given in Tables 1 and 2.
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Uni-
versità e della Ricerca (MIUR, Rome, Italy) and from the University
of Calabria (Rende, Italy) is gratefully acknowledged (Progetto di
Ricerca d’Interesse Nazionale PRIN 2008A7P7YJ).
10. Characterization data for selected products: For 2d: Pale yellow oil. IR (film):
m
= 2932 (m), 2862 (m), 2230 (w), 1580 (m), 1465 (m), 1232 (m), 1124 (w), 951
(w), 799 (w), 734 (w) cmꢁ1 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 5.87 (s, 1H, H-4),
;
References and notes
2.51 (t, J = 7.7, 2H, @CCH2), 2.37 (t, J = 6.9, 2H, „CCH2), 2.28 (s, 3H, Me at C-2),
1.63–1.24 (m, 8H, 2CH2CH2CH3), 0.93 (t, J = 7.4, 3H, CH2CH3), 0.91 (t, J = 7.4, 3H,
CH2CH3); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d = 154.0, 153.5, 107.6, 103.7, 92.0, 72.9,
31.1, 30.1, 27.5, 22.2, 22.0, 19.2, 13.8, 13.7, 12.5; GC–MS (EI, 70 eV): m/z = 218
(M+, 28), 176 (14), 175 (100), 145 (4), 133 (11), 117 (4), 105 (5), 91 (8), 77 (6);
Anal. Calcd for C15H22O (218.33): C, 82.52; H, 10.16. Found: C, 82.45; H, 10.19.
1. For recent reviews on copper-catalyzed processes see: (a) Eckenhoff, W. T.;
Pintauer, T. Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng. 2010, 52, 1–59; (b) Wencel, J.; Mouduit, M.;
Henon, H.; Kehrli, S.; Alexakis, A. Aldrichim. Acta 2009, 42, 43–50; (c) Daugulis,
O.; Do, H.-Q.; Shabashov, D. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1074–1086; (d) Bracey, C.
L.; Ellis, P. R.; Hutchings, G. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2231–2243; (e) Evano,
G.; Toumi, M.; Coste, A. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4166–4175; (f) Jerphagnon, T.;
Pizzuti, M. G.; Minnaard, A. J.; Feringa, B. L. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 1039–
1075; (g) Diez-Gonzalez, S.; Nolan, S. P. Aldrichim. Acta 2008, 41, 43–51; (h)
Reymond, S.; Cossy, J. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 5359–5406; (i) Ma, D.; Cai, Q. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1450–1460; (j) Alexakis, A.; Bäckvall, J. E.; Krause, N.;
Pamies, O.; Dieguez, M. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2796–2823; (k) Yamada, K.-i.;
Tomioka, K. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2874–2886; (l) Stanley, L. M.; Sibi, M. P.
Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2887–2902; (m) Poulsen, T. B.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. Rev.
2008, 108, 2903–2915; (n) Pintauer, T.; Matyjaszewski, K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008,
37, 1087–1097; (o) Carril, M.; SanMartin, R.; Dominguea, E. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2008, 37, 639–647; (p) Punniyamurthy, T.; Rout, L. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2008, 252,
134–154; (q) D’Souza, D. M.; Muller, T. J. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1095–1108;
(r) Diez-Gonzalez, S.; Nola, S. P. Synlett 2007, 2158–2167; (s) Angell, Y. L.;
Burgess, K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1674–1689; (t) Asao, N. Synlett 2006,
1645–1656; (u) Csende, F.; Stajer, G. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005, 9, 1737–1755; (v)
Beletskaya, I. P.; Cheprakov, A. V. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 2337–2364; (w)
Kirmse, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 1088–1093; (x) Alexakis, A.;
Benhaim, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 3221–3236; (y) Finet, J. P.; Fedorov, A. Y.;
Combes, S.; Boyer, G. Curr. Org. Chem. 2002, 6, 597–626; (z) Yoo, E. J.; Chang, S.
Curr. Org. Chem. 2002, 13, 1766–1776; (aa) Andrus, M. B.; Lashley, J. C.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 845–866.
For 2g: Pale yellow oil. IR (film):
m
= 2968 (m), 2878 (m), 2229 (w), 1752 (s),
1548 (w), 1459 (w), 1338 (s), 1171 (m), 1108 (m), 856 (w) cmꢁ1
;
1H NMR
(300 MHz, CDCl3): d = 5.87 (t, J = 0.9, 1H, H-4), 2.77–2.69 (m, 2H, @CCH2), 2.43
(s, 3H, Me at C-2), 2.39 (t, J = 7.0, 2H, „CCH2), 1.62–1.30 (m, 8H, 2CH2CH2CH3),
1.58 (s, 9H, t-Bu), 0.93 (t, J = 7.1, 3H, CH2CH3), 0.92 (t, J = 7.1, 3H, CH2CH3); 13C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): d = 150.1, 135.3, 134.4, 111.8, 106.4, 91.6, 83.7, 74.9,
31.3, 29.0, 28.1, 22.5, 22.0, 19.3, 14.8, 14.0, 13.6; MS (ESI+): m/z = 340
[(M+Na)+]; Anal. Calcd for C20H31NO2 (317.47): C, 75.67; H, 9.84; N, 4.41.
Found: C, 75.75; H, 9.81; N, 4.43.
11. Substituted furans and pyrroles are very important classes of heterocyclic
compounds, which present a wide range of biological activity. For some recent
reviews, see: (a) Fan, H.; Peng, J.; Hamann, M. T.; Hu, J.-F. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108,
264–287; (b) Piozzi, F.; Bruno, M.; Rosselli, S.; Maggio, A. Heterocycles 2007, 74,
31–52; (c) Biava, M.; Porretta, G. C.; Manetti, F. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2007, 7,
65–78; (d) Liu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Abreu, P. J. M. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 630–651;
(e) Bellina, F.; Rossi, R. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 7213–7256; (f) Sperry, J. B.;
Wright, D. L. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 2005, 8, 723–740; (g) Huffman, J. W.
Curr. Med. Chem. 1999, 6, 705–720.
12. For recent reviews on the synthesis of furans and pyrroles by heterocyclization
approaches, see: (a) Lu, Y.; Song, F.; Jia, X.; Liu, Y. Prog. Chem. 2010, 22, 58–70;
(b) Luo, P.; Tang, R.; Zhong, P.; Li, J. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 29, 1924–1937; (c)
Muzalevskiy, V. M.; Shastin, A. V.; Balenkova, E. S.; Haufe, G.; Nenajdenko, V. G.
Synthesis 2009, 23, 3905–3929; (d) Brichacek, M.; Njardarson, J. T. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2009, 7, 1761–1770; (e) Majumdar, K. C.; Debnath, P.; Roy, B.
Heterocycles 2009, 78, 2661–2728; (f) Van Otterlo, W. A. L.; de Koning, C. B.
Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3743–3782; (g) Yamamoto, Y.; Gridnev, I. D.; Patil, N. T.;
Jin, T. Chem. Commun. 2009, 34, 5075–5087; (h) Ono, N. Heterocycles 2008, 75,
243–284; (i) Martins, M. A. P.; Frizzo, C. P.; Moreira, D. N.; Zanatta, N.;
Bonacorso, H. G. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2015–2050; (j) Patil, N. T.; Yamamoto, Y.
Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3395–3442; (k) Cadierno, V.; Crochet, P. Curr. Org. Synth.
2008, 5, 343–364; (l) Kirsch, S. F. Synthesis 2008, 3183–3204; (i) Shen, H. C.
Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 3885–3903; (m) Shestopalov, A. M.; Shestopalov, A. A.;
Rodonovskaya, L. A. Synthesis 2008, 1–25; (n) Balme, G.; Bouyssi, D.; Monteiro,
N. Heterocycles 2007, 73, 87–124; (o) Hashmi, A. S. K. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107,
3180–3211; (p) Schmunck, C.; Rupprecht, D. Synthesis 2007, 3095–3110;
Kirsch, S. F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 2076–2080; (q) Agarwal, S.; Cammerer,
S.; Filali, S.; Frohner, W.; Knoll, M. P.; Reddy, K. R.; Knolker, H. J. Curr. Org. Chem.
2005, 9, 1601–1614.
2. (a) Gabriele, B.; Mancuso, R.; Lupinacci, E.; Spina, R.; Salerno, G.; Veltri, L.;
Dibenedetto, A. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 8507–8512; (b) Gabriele, B.; Mancuso, R.;
Salerno, G.; Ruffolo, G.; Plastina, P. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6873–6877; (c)
Gabriele, B.; Salerno, G.; Fazio, A. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 7853–7861.
3. 3-Yne-1,2-diols 1a–d were easily prepared by alkynylation of the appropriate
a
-hydroxy ketone or a-hydroxy ester (a-hydroxyacetone in the case of 1a; a-
hydroxyacetophenone in the case of 1b and 1c; ethyl
a-hydroxypropionate in
the case of 1d) with an excess of R3C„CLi.
4. N-Substituted 1-amino-3-yn-2-ols 1e–h were easily prepared by alkynylation,
with an excess of R3C„CMgBr, of the appropriate N-Boc-
Boc- -amino ester, or N-tosyl- -amino ester
a
-amino aldehyde, N-
(N-Boc-2-amino-3-
a
a
phenylpropionaldehyde in the case of 1e; N-Boc-2-aminopropionaldehyde in
the case of 1f; methyl N-Boc-2-aminopropionate in the case of 1g; methyl N-
tosyl-2-aminopropionate in the case of 1h).
5. (a) Egi, M.; Azechi, K.; Akai, S. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5002–5005; (b) Aponick, A.; Li,
C.-Y.; Malinge, J.; Marques, E. F. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4624–4627; (c) Yada, Y.;
Miyake, Y.; Nishibayashi, Y. Organometallics 2008, 27, 3614–3617; (d) Hayes, S.