Annese et al.
JOCArticle
Conclusions
Be the mechanistic details as they may, results herein
suggest that the powerful dioxirane TFDO (1b) should be
the oxidant of choice for the synthesis of unnatural peptides or
amino acids, presenting selective oxidative modifications at
the protected N-H element and/or at the side chain C-H
moiety as those of the D-Leu N-terminal residue in the
substrates examined. This finding is valuable if one recalls
that the products usually are ammonia (or ammonium salts)
and nitrogen-free residues when amino acids or peptides are
directly oxidized with common oxidants.11 Then, our method
should bring a major flexibility in the design of novel bioactive
peptide analogues. In particular, the efficient production of
N-OH derivatives 3a, 3e, 3g, and 5 is notable because the
synthesis of N-hydroxypeptides represents a challenging goal;
in fact, these are key intermediates in metabolic pathways and
can be found in human and animal tumors.16
In addition, the TFDO oxidations that yield the terminal
nitro derivatives 6, 8, and 10 represent no small feat. Indeed,
the family of such nitro compounds stand for the starting
point for several useful synthetic applications.17 It is also
remarkable that, presumably because of a nonradical oxida-
tion mechanism, the reactions reported herein occur with
complete retention of configuration. This stereochemical
outcome is observed with all products reported, with the
obvious exception of 6 and 10, in which case the chirality at
the proximal R-CH was not retained due to the considerable
acidity of the hydrogen adjacent to the nitro group.11
FIGURE 1. Energy barrier to a TS featuring a quasipyramidal
nitrogen lone pair receiving dioxirane electrophilic attack.
Rather, it might result from previous electrophilic oxidation
at the lone pair on nitrogen, followed by the rapid conversion
of the N-oxide intermediate into a hydroxylamino derivative,
i.e., R(H)(H)N: f R(H)(H)Nþ-O- f R(H)N-OH .
If this is the case, for the transformation at hand it remains
unclear why only carbamate protected peptide esters display
N-H hydroxylation, while those presenting the amide PG
do not. An answer might be found considering first that,
with respect to the amine moiety in the amide group, the
availability of the nitrogen lone pair for dioxirane electro-
philic attack is widely diminished because of delocalization
into the carbonyl over the π system. Thus, in an amide group
-NH-C(:O)-, for an approximately planar three-atom fra-
mework the rotational barrier to twist the C-N linkage is
increased by more than 10 kcal/mol as compared to ordinary
amines.15a
Second, one might recall that several investigations15 have
shown that the barrier to rotation about partial C-N double
bonds in amides and carbamates (urethanes) varies mark-
edly. Actually, in a carbamate group -O-C(:O)-NH-, two
resonances (nN f π*C-O and nO f π*C-O) compete with
each other for the delocalization onto the same π*C-O
orbital, thus lowering the activation energy to rotation about
partial C-N double bonds (Figure 1) by ca. 2-4 kcal mol-1
with respect to that of comparable amides (Eq = 12.4 to 14.3
kcal mol-1).15 Thus, as sketched in Figure 1, dioxirane attack
should be facilitated.
Consistent with this view is our finding that, when an
effective electron-withdrawing group (R) is present in the
carbamate PG, the diminished electron density on oxygen
hinders the competition with the nitrogen for conjugation
to the carbonyl, so that the rotational barrier to the transi-
tion state increases;15 as a result, the process of N-oxidation
becomes less favorable. This seems to be the case for the
TcBoc- substrate 2f. In this instance, the presence of the
electron-withdrawing group (R = Cl3C-(CH3)2C-) signifi-
cantly reduces the amount of the N-hydroxylation product
5f with respect to that of side chain oxidation 4f (entry 2,
Table 2).
Experimental Section
Starting Materials. Boc-tripeptide 2a was obtained following
coupling procedures in solution and then used for the synthesis of
substrates 2b-g upon deprotection (TFA or dry HCl/MeOH)18
and reprotection of the free terminal amino group as appropriate.
Tripeptide 7 was synthesized according to a reported method;7
Cbz-Leu-OCH3 (9) was obtained starting with the corresponding
commercial acid upon reaction with CH3I.19 These substrates
presented purity >95% (HPLC and/or 1H NMR).
N-tert-Butyloxycarbonyl-D-leucyl-L-alanyl-L-alanine methyl ester
(2a): mp 78-80 °C; [R]D -32.4 (c 0.96, CH3OH); HRMS-ESI
(M þ Hþ) calcd for C18H34N3O6 388.2448, found 388.2396.
þ
N-Acetyl-D-leucyl-L-alanyl-L-alanine methyl ester (2b): mp 188-
189 °C; [R]D -34.8 (c 0.93, CH3OH); HRMS-ESI (M þ Hþ)
calcd for C15H28N3O5þ 330.2029, found 330.2023. N-Trifluoro-
acetyl-D-leucyl-L-alanyl-L-alanine methyl ester (2c): mp 172-
173 °C; [R]D -32.6 (c 1.07, CH3OH); HRMS-ESI (M þ Hþ)
þ
calcd for C15H25F3N3O5 384.1746, found 384.1846. N-Tri-
methylacetyl-D-leucyl-L-alanyl-L-alanine methyl ester (2d): mp
110-113 °C; [R]D -37.7 (c 0.96, CH3OH); HRMS-ESI (M þ
Hþ) calcd for C18H34N3O5 372.2498, found 372.2531. N-
þ
Methyloxycarbonyl-D-leucyl-L-alanyl-L-alanine methyl ester (2e):
mp 160-162 °C; [R]D -18.3 (c 0.7, CH3OH); HRMS-ESI
þ
It is apparent that further careful work is in order to
put our intriguing mechanistic hypothesis to the test. In any
case, in view of the limited electron density at nitrogen of
the -O-C(:O)-NH- moieties, it is perhaps not surprising
that a potent oxidant such as TFDO should be needed for
N-hydroxylation.
(MþNa) calcd for C15H27N3NaO6 368.1798, found 368.1787.
N-(2,2,2-Trichloro-tert-butyloxycarbonyl)-D-leucyl-L-alanyl-L-ala-
nine methyl ester (2f): mp 81-83 °C; [R]D -23.6 (c 3.4, CH3OH);
(16) (a) Yanagisawa, A.; Takeshita, S.; Izumi, Y.; Yoshida, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5328. (b) Merino, P.; Tejero, T. Angew.Chem., Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 2995 and references cited therein.
(17) (a) Eyer, M.; Seebach, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3601. (b)
Ram, S.; Ehrenkaufer, R. E. Synthesis 1986, 133. (c) Gogte, V. N.; Natu,
A. A.; Pore, V. S. Synth. Commun. 1987, 17, 1421.
(18) For instance, see: Shendage, D. M.; Froehlich, R.; Haufe, G. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 3675.
(19) Garner, P.; Park, J. M. Org. Synth. 1992, 70, 18.
(15) (a) Pontes, R. M.; Basso, E. A.; dos Santos, F. P. J. Org. Chem. 2007,
72, 1901. (b) Modarresi-Alam, A. R.; Najafi, P.; Rostamizadeh, M.; Keykha,
H.; Bijanzadeh, H. R.; Kleinpeter, E. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2208. (c)
Yamagami, C.; Takao, N.; Takeuchi, Y. Aust. J. Chem. 1986, 39, 457 and
references cited therein.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 14, 2010 4815