synthesizing fully conjugated triply linked di- and tri-PBIs11
and also monobay-dichlorinated PBIs.12
sibility for further functionalization on the other bay area, which
makes it a promising conjugated chiral platform.
PBI 2 with a 2,2′-biphenoxy bridging unit at one bay area
was synthesized directly from tetrachloro-substituted PBI 1
and 2,2′-biphenol (mole ratio 1:1) in 57% yield as outlined
in Scheme 1. The further nucleophilic substitution of the
remaining two chlorine atoms in PBI 2 with excess amount
of 2,2′-biphenol afforded PBI 3 with two biphenoxy bridges.
Different phenoxyl groups with functional substituents may
be introduced to PBI 2 by nucleophilic substitution of the
two chlorine atoms to form PBIs with unsymmetrical
substitution pattern on the two bay areas. The proof-of-the-
concept example of the unsymmetrical bay-substituted PBI
4 was synthesized in order to compare the optical properties
of the PBIs with different rigidity.
The introduction of bay substituents endows the perylene
core with a twisted π-system. It has been recognized already
some years ago that such twisted PBI fluorophores might
possess interesting chiroptical properties.13 However, it is
usually difficult to isolate enantiomerically pure PBIs due
to the low barriers for the interconversion of the two core-
twisted atropisomers in solution. The kinetic racemization
process could be, in principle, prevented by increasing the
size of the sterically demanding bay substituents.14 Another
strategy that was developed in our group to restrict the
dynamic racemization process of tetraphenoxy-substituted
perylene bismides is based on the bridging of phenoxy
substituents at the bay positions with oligo(ethylene glycol)
chains through macrocyclization.15 However, this strategy
suffers from the inherent difficulty of further chemical
functionalization of the chiral PBI unit.
Compared with the tetrachloro-substituted PBI 1, its
monocyclization to PBI 2 with a 2,2′-biphenoxy bridge at
one bay area might introduce more rigidity, which would
make the interconversion of the twisted conformers (P and
M) less facile. Indeed, the enantiomers of PBI 2 are separable
by HPLC on a chiral colunm (Reprosil 100 chiral-NR) at
room temperature using dichloromethane as the eluent (see
Figure S7 in Supporting Information). The configurations
of the first and the second eluted atropisomers (retention
times 4.0 and 5.3 min) are assigned as P and M, respectively,
by comparing their circular dichroism (CD) spectra with
those of previously reported atropisomerically pure macro-
cyclic PBIs (details are given in following sections).16
The molecular geometry of PBI 2 was optimized with
HyperChem using a semiempirical method (AM1), and the
results are shown in Figure 1. As can be seen in the geometry
optimized structures, one phenyl ring of the biphenyl group is
situated above the perylene core, while the other one extends
to the side of the perylene core.17 Accordingly, the molecular
structure loses symmetry elements owing to the different
substituents on two bay areas and the twisted configuration of
the biphenyl unit relative to the perylene core. This structual
Herein we present a new approach to configurationally stable
chiral PBIs, e.g., PBI 2, bearing reactive substituents at one of
the two bay areas for further functionalization. This was
achieved by introduction of a rigid 2,2′-biphenol bridge at one
bay area. The two adjacent phenoxyl groups are connected
directly at ortho positions by a covalent C-C bond, which not
only introduces an asymmetric structure at the bay area but also
imparts rigidity to the perylene core. The rigid and twisted
π-system achieved by this approach facilitates the separation
of the atropo-enantiomers, and thus investigation of their
chiroptical properties and elucidation of activation parameters
for the racemization. The most attractive feature of this
unprecedented chiral monobiphenyl-bridged PBI is the pos-
(7) (a) Omote, M.; Nishimura, Y.; Sato, K.; Ando, A.; Kumadaki, I.
Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 1886. (b) Ceccacci, F.; Mancini, G.; Sferrazza, A.;
Villani, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13762. (c) Bringmann, G.; Price
Mortimer, A. J.; Keller, P. A.; Gresser, M. J.; Garner, J.; Breuning, M.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5384.
(8) (a) Zhou, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Zhu, D. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 6164. (b) van Delden, R. A.; Mecca, T.; Rosini, C.; Feringa,
B. L. Chem.sEur. J. 2004, 10, 61. (c) Ishow, E.; Credi, A.; Balzani, V.;
Spadola, F.; Mandolini, L. Chem.sEur. J. 1999, 5, 984. (d) Pu, L. Chem.
ReV. 1998, 98, 2405. (e) Frank, B. B.; Blanco, B. C.; Jakob, S.; Ferroni, F.;
Pieraccini, S.; Ferrarini, A.; Boudon, C.; Gisselbrecht, J. P.; Seiler, P.; Spada,
G. P.; Diederich, F. Chem.sEur. J. 2009, 15, 9005. (f) Sandoval, C. A.;
Ohkuma, T.; Muñiz, K.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13490.
(9) (a) Fasel, R.; Parschau, M.; Ernst, K. H. Nature 2006, 439, 449. (b)
1
feature is supported by H, HH-COSY and 13C NMR spectra
of PBI 2 (see Supporting Information). The similar structural
information was also obtained for PBI 4. In the case of bis-
biphenoxy-substituted PBI 3, two diastereomers are expected
as the two biphenyl groups may locate at the same face (denoted
as minor-3) or two different faces (denoted as major-3) of the
perylene core. The 1H NMR spectra and semiempirical calcula-
tions indeed support the coexistence of the two diastereomers
of PBI 3 (for details, see Supporting Information).
The atropo-enantiomers of PBI 2 were successfully
resolved by HPLC using a semipreparative chiral column at
room temperature. The CD spectra of the isolated enanti-
omers of PBI 2 show a clear mirror image relation as
depicted in Figure 2 (bottom). In the region of 460-570 nm
of the CD spectra, a broad monosignated peak with a
maximum at 539 nm can be seen that nicely correlates with
the absorption maximum at 545 nm (Figure 2, top). In the
´
Carren˜o, M. C.; Enríquez, A.; Garc´ıa-Cerrada, S.; Sanz-Cuesta, M. J.;
Urbano, A.; Maseras, F.; Nonell-Canals, A. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 603.
(c) Wigglesworth, T. J.; Sud, D.; Norsten, T. B.; Lekhi, V. S.; Branda,
N. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7272. (d) Rajca, A.; Miyasaka, M.;
Pink, M.; Wang, H.; Rajca, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15211. For a
review, see: (e) Amemiya, R.; Yamaguchi, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008,
6, 26.
(10) (a) Wu¨rthner, F. Pure Appl. Chem. 2006, 78, 2341. (b) Grimsdale,
A. C.; Mu¨llen, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 5592.
(11) (a) Qian, H.; Wang, Z.; Yue, W.; Zhu, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 10664. (b) Shi, Y.; Qian, H.; Li, Y.; Yue, W.; Wang, Z. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 2337. (c) Qian, H.; Negri, F.; Wang, C.; Wang, Z. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 17970. (d) Qian, H.; Yue, W.; Zhen, Y.; Motta, S. D.;
Donato, E. D.; Negri, F.; Qu, J.; Xu, W.; Zhu, D.; Wang, Z. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 74, 6275.
(12) Zhen, Y.; Qian, H.; Xiang, J.; Qu, J.; Wang, Z. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 3084.
(13) Hien, S. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Regensburg, Regensburg,
Germany, 1995.
(16) Osswald, P.; Reichert, M.; Bringmann, G.; Wu¨rthner, F. J. Org.
Chem. 2007, 72, 3403.
(14) Osswald, P.; Wu¨rthner, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14319.
(15) Osswald, P.; Leusser, D.; Stalke, D.; Wu¨rthner, F. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 250.
(17) For similar structural geometry, see: Miyake, Y.; Wu, M.; Rahman,
M. J.; Kuwatani, Y.; Iyoda, M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 6110.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 14, 2010
3205