C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 1. Rearrangement of 12ꢀ-Hydroxy Steroids Using the
Scheme 3
Comins Reagenta
Hirschmann in his initial studies.6 These substrates proved to give
the rearrangement in high yields and selectivity for the endo-
products. All substrates shown in Table 1 could not be rearranged
using the various conditions reported by Hirschmann6 or Fu’s PCl5
system13 with the exception of hecogenine derivative 22 which
reacted readily under all conditions.
In conclusion, we developed a novel reagent combination for
the rearrangement of 12ꢀ-hydroxy steroids. This method accesses
otherwise difficult to obtain C-nor-D-homo-steroids and is char-
acterized by giving predominantly the endocyclic double bond
isomer and rendering for the first time available 17-keto steroids,
a species completely unreactive to this type of rearrangement before.
We therefore believe that the application of our method in total
synthesis can both simplify and shorten routes to natural products
bearing a C-nor-D-homo-steroid skeleton and help to enable
convergent strategies. Future work will address mechanistic studies
and biological testing of the obtained products.
Acknowledgment. Bayer Schering Pharma is acknowledged for
a gracious gift of steroids.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures and
spectral data for all compounds. This material is available free of charge
a Reaction conditions: substrate (0.30 mmol), N-(5-chloro-2-pyridyl)
triflimide (0.90 mmol), DMAP (1.80 mmol), toluene (10 mL), 111 °C.
b Only the main isomer is shown. c The yields refer to isolated products
in the order endo-product:exo-product. The values within parentheses are
the yields of the elimination byproduct (∆-11-12-steroids). d No
endo-product was isolated. e Additionally, 9% of rearranged product
with a ∆-13-17 double bond was isolated.
References
(1) Li, H.-J.; Jiang, Y.; Li, P. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 735–752.
(2) Heretsch, P.; Tzagkaroulaki, L.; Giannis, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010,
49, 3418–3427, and citations therein.
(3) Gao, S.; Wang, Q.; Huang, L. J.-S.; Lum, L.; Chen, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 371–383.
(4) Guile, S. D.; Saxton, J. E.; Thornton-Pett, M. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1992, 1763–1767.
(5) Brown, E.; Lebreton, J. Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 5827–5840.
(6) (a) Hirschmann, R.; Snoddy, C. S., Jr.; Wendler, N. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1952, 74, 2693–2694. (b) Hiskey, C. F.; Hirschmann, R.; Wendler, N. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 5135–5136. (c) Hirschmann, R.; Snoddy, C. S.,
Jr.; Hiskey, C. F.; Wendler, N. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1954, 76, 4013–
4025.
Scheme 2
(7) Kaneko, K.; Mitsuhashi, H.; Hirayama, K.; Yoshida, N. Phytochemistry
1970, 9, 2489–2495.
(8) (a) Giannis, A.; Heretsch, P.; Sarli, V.; Sto¨ssel, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 7911–7914. (b) Heretsch, P.; Rabe, S.; Giannis, A. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 5410–5412.
(9) (a) Mitsuhashi, H.; Shimizu, Y. Tetrahedron 1963, 19, 1027–1035. (b)
Mitsuhashi, H.; Shibata, K.; Sato, T.; Shimizu, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1964,
12, 1–5.
(10) Comins, D. L.; Dheghani, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 6299–6302.
(11) McMurry, J. E.; Scott, W. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 979–982.
(12) Solvents that gave no or a very slow reaction: benzene, dichloroethane,
nitromethane, n-octane; solvents that gave similar or slightly lower yields:
chlorobenzene, pyridine, xylenes.
(13) Fu, X.; Chan, T.-M.; Tann, C.-H.; Thiruvengadam, T. K. Steroids 2002,
67, 549–554.
(14) On treatment of 13 with PCl5 in THF at-78 °C, no elimination occurred
but 3-benzyl-12ꢀ-(4-chlorobutoxy)-dehydroepiandrosterone (24) was ob-
tained in 50% yield, presumably by ring opening of a molecule of solvent
facilitated by PCl5. A similar observation using SOCl2 at high temperatures
has been reported: Ferrari, T.; Vogel, P. Synlett 1991, 233–234.
(15) Scho¨necker, B.; Zheldakova, T.; Liu, Y.; Ko¨tteritzsch, M.; Gu¨nther, W.;
Go¨rls, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 3240–3244.
(16) (a) Johns, W. F.; Salamon, K. W. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 958–961. (b)
Green, M. J.; Abraham, N. A.; Fleischer, E. B.; Case, J.; Fried, J. Chem.
Commun. 1970, 234–235. (c) Johnson, W. S.; Cox, J. M.; Graham, D. W.;
Whitlock, H. W., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 4524–4526.
(17) Marko, I. E.; Ates, A.; Gautier, A.; Leroy, B.; Plancher, J.-M.; Quesnel,
Y.; Vanherck, J.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 3207–3209.
control experiment we subjected the substrates to the action of triflic
acid in toluene under reflux conditions. In all cases but 4 and 13,
only excessive degradation was observed. 13 gave the elimination
product 34 (see Supporting Information) while 4 remained un-
changed. Thus, a mechanism based on acid induced cation formation
does not seem to be responsible for the observed reaction outcome.
We also examined other substituents in position 17 and thereby
explored the functional group tolerance of our method. Interestingly,
by converting the 17-keto group into an acetal (like 9) and treating
these substrates under our conditions we could isolate both
rearranged acetals 10 and 11 with a slight prevalence of the
exocyclic double bond isomer 10. On careful treatment with cerium
ammonium nitrate in a pH 9 buffer solution,17 we were able to isolate
the corresponding enones 12 and 5, respectively (Scheme 3).
Further examples included progesterone derivative 18, DHEA-
lactone 20 with inverted stereochemistry at C-17 with regard to
lactone 1, and hecogenine derivative 22 similar to the one used by
JA103152K
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 29, 2010 9969