JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2010 43
Table 2 Crystallographic parameters
Ligand 2
cm−1): 1600 (C=N). Calcd for C28H39Cl CrN2O: C, 58.19; H, 6.80; N,
4.85. Found: C, 58.26; H, 6.88; N, 4.913%
[4-tert-butyl-2-{(2,6-diisopropylphenylimino)methyl)-6-((4-
methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl)}phenol]CrCl3 (C4): Green solid, Yield
81%. IR (KBr, cm−1): 1604 (C=N). Calcd for C H42Cl3CrN3O: C,
57.38; H, 6.97; N, 6.92. Found: C, 57.45; H, 7.02; 2N9 , 6.98%
Empirical formula
Formula weight
Temperature (K)
Wavelength (Å)
Crystal system
Space group
C29 H42 N2 O
434.65
113(2)
0.71073
Procedure for ethylene oligomerisation
Triclinic
Ethylene oligomerisation at 30 atm ethylene pressure was carried out
in a 250-mL autoclave stainless steel reactor equipped with a mechan-
ical stirrer and a temperature controller. Toluene, the desired amount
of cocatalyst and a toluene solution of the catalyst precursor (the total
volume was 100 mL) was added to the reactor in this order under an
ethylene atmosphere. Upon reaching the desired reaction temperature,
ethylene with the desired pressure was introduced to start the reaction,
and the ethylene pressure was kept by constant feeding of ethylene.
After 30 min, the reaction was stopped. The catalytic reaction mixture
was quenched with HCl-acidified ethanol (5%) in an ice-water bath
in accordance with the oligomers produced. Then the solution was
analysed by gas chromatography for determining the distribution of
oligomers obtained.
P-1
a (Å)
10.700(2)
14.447(3)
17.502(4)
77.83(3)
b (Å)
c (Å)
α (°)
β (°)
86.63(3)
88.34(3)
γ (°)
Vol.(Å3)
2639.8(9)
Z
4
Dcalc(Mg m−3)
1.094
µ(mm−1)
0.065
Reflections collected/unique [Rint]
F(000)
19552/9261
952
Crystal size (mm)
θ Range for data collection (°)
Data/restraints/parameters
Final R indices [I > 2σ(I)]
R indices (all data)
Goodness-of-fit on F2
Largest differences in peak and
hole(eÅ−3)
0.26 × 0.24 × 0.16
1.44–25.02
9261/0/594
R1 = 0.0567, WR2 = 0.1527
R1 = 0.0739, WR2 = 0.1671
1.037
X-ray crystallographic studies
Ligand L2 intensity data sets were collected at 113(2) K on a Rigaku
RAXIS Rapid IP diffractometer with graphite-monochromated
Mo-Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). Cell parameters were obtained by
the global refinement of the positions of all collected reflections.
Intensities were corrected by Lorentz and polarization effects and
empirical absorptions were applied. The structure was solved by
direct method, and refined by full-matrix least-squares on F2 using
SHELXS-97 package [G. M. Sheldrick, SHELXTL Version 5.1,
Bruker Analytical X-rayInstruments Inc, Madison, WI, USA, 1998].
0.342 and –0.234
(t, 4H, NCH CH2CH2), 1.514 (m, 2H, NCH2CH CH2), 1.379 (s, 9H,
ArC(CH3)3), 21.209–1.223 (d, J = 6.5Hz, 12H, Ar2(CH(CH3)2) ). Calcd
for C29H42N2O: C, 80.13; H, 9.74; N, 6.44. Found: C, 79.98;2H, 9.68;
N, 6.49%
Received 13 October 2009; accepted 30 November 2009
Paper 090826 doi: 10.3184/030823410X12628736648105
Published online: 22 January 2010
(E)-4-tert-butyl-2-{(2,6-diisopropylphenylimino)methyl)-6-(pyrro-
lidin-1-ylmethyl}- phenol (L3): Yellow crystals, yield 91%. IR (KBr,
1
cm−1): 1620 (C=N). H NMR (500 MHz, CDC13): δ 8.399 (s, 1H,
ArCH=N), 7.578 (s, 1H, H-ArCH=N), 7.453 (s, 1H, H-ArCH=N),
7.199–7.211 (m, 3H, C=NArH), 3.752 (s, 2H, ArCH N), 2.981–3.023
(m, 2H, Ar(CH(CH ) )2), 2.584 (m, 4H, NCH2CH2), 1.702(m, 4H,
NCH CH2), 1.388 (3s,2 9H, ArC(CH3)3), 1.198-1.2121 (d, J = 6.5Hz,
12H, 2Ar(CH(CH3) )2). Calcd for C28H N O: C, 79.95; H, 9.59; N,
6.66. Found: C, 792.83; H, 9.51; N, 6.634%0 . 2(E)-4-tert-butyl-2-{(2,6-dii
sopropylphenylimino)methyl)-6-((4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)methyl)}
phenol (L4): Yellow oil, yield 95%. IR (KBr, cm–1): 1624 (C=N). 1H
NMR (500 MHz, CDC13): δ 8.312 (s, 1H, ArCH=N), 7.533 (s, 1H,
H-ArCH=N), 7.302 (s, 1H, H-ArCH=N), 7.182 (s, 3H, C=NArH),
3.786 (s, 2H, ArCH2N), 2.977–3.005 (m, 2H, Ar(CH(CH3)2)2), 2.582–
2.887 (s, 8H, NCH2CH2N), 2.398–2.433 (m, 3H, NCH2CH2NCH3),
1.345 (s, 9H, ArC(CH ) ), 1.172–1.186 (d, J = 7.0Hz, 12H,
Ar(CH(CH3)2)2). Calcd fo3r 3C29H43N O: C, 77.46; H, 9.64; N, 9.34.
Found: C, 77.66; H, 9.56; N, 9.28%.3
References
1
2
V.C. Gibson and S.K. Spitzmesser, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103, 283.
E. Groppo, C. Lamberti, S. Bordiga, G. Spoto and A. Zecchina, Chem.
Rev., 2005, 105, 115.
3
4
A. Clark, Catal. Rev., 1969, 3, 145.
F.J. Karol, G.L. Karapinka, C. Wu, A.W. Dow, R.N. Johnson and W.L.
Carrick, J. Polymer. Sci., Part A: Polymer. Chem., 1972, 10, 2621.
V.C. Gibson, S. Mastroianni, C. Newton, C. Redshaw, G.A. Solan, A.J.P.
White and D.J. Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2000, 1969.
V.C. Gibson, C. Newton, C. Redshaw, G.A. Solan, A.J.P. White and D.J.
Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1999, 827.
V.C. Gibson, P.J. Maddox, C. Newton, C. Redshaw, G.A. Solan, A.J.P.
White and D.J. Williams, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1651.
L.A. McAdams,W.-K. Kim, L.M. Liable-Sands, I.A. Guzei,A.L. Rheingold
and K.H. Theopold, Organometallics, 2002, 21, 952.
5
6
7
8
9
P. Wei and D.W. Stephan, Organometallics, 2002, 21, 1308.
10 D.J. Jones, V.C. Gibson, S.M. Green and P.J. Maddox, Chem. Commun.,
2002, 1038.
11 H. Sugiyama, G. Aharonian, S. Gambarotta, G.P.A. Yap and P.H.M.
Budzelaar, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 12268.
12 M.J. Carney, N.J. Robertson, J.A. Halfen, L.N. Zakharov and A.L.
Rheingold, Organometallics, 2004, 23, 6184.
13 R.D. Köln, M. Haufe, G. Kociak-Köhn, S. Grimm, P. Wasserscheid and
W. Keim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 4337.
14 D.S. McGuinness, P. Wasserscheid, D.H. Morgan and J.T. Dixon,
Organometallics, 2005, 24, 552.
15 R.J. Baker and P.G. Edwards, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2002, 2960.
16 D.S. McGuinness, P. Wasserscheid, W. Keim, D. Morgan, J.T. Dixon,
A. Bollmann, H. Maumela, F. Hess and U. Englert, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2003, 125, 5272.
17 D.S. McGuinness, V.C. Gibson, D.F. Wass and J.W. Steed, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2003, 125, 12716.
18 J. Liu, Y. Li, J. Liu and Z. Li, J. Mol. Catal. A: C, hem., 2006, 244, 99.
19 M. Fennie, E. DiMauro, E. O’Brien, V. Annamalai and M. Kozlowski,
Tetrahedron, 2005, 61, 6249.
Synthesis of complexes
0.20 mmol of [CrCl3(THF)3] and 0.21 mmol of ligand were dissolved
in THF (20 mL). The solution was refluxed for 2 h and then cooled
to room temperature. The solution was filtered, then part of solvent
was removed in vacuum. Ether (100 mL) was added to the reaction
mixture, and this mixture was allowed to stand for an appropriate
period of time, after which it was filtered and the solid was obtained.
[4-tert-butyl-2-{(2,6-diisopropylphenylimino)methyl)-6-(morpholi
nomethyl}phenol]CrCl3 (C1): Green solid, Yield 71%. IR (KBr,
cm−1): 1604 (C=N). Calcd for C28H Cl3CrN O2: C, 56.62; H, 6.62;
N, 4.72. Found: C, 56.87; H, 6.78; N3,94.79%. 2
[4-tert-butyl-2-{(2,6-diisopropylphenylimino)methyl)-6-(piperidin-
1-ylmethyl}phenol]CrCl3 (C2): Green solid, Yield 75%. IR (KBr,
cm−1): 1609 (C=N). Calcd for C29H41Cl CrN2O: C, 58.84; H, 6.98; N,
4.73. Found: C, 58.95; H, 6.87; N, 4.863%.
[4-tert-butyl-2-{(2,6-diisopropylphenylimino)methyl)-6-(pyrro-
lidin-1-ylmethyl}phenol]CrCl3 (C3): Green solid,Yield 69%. IR (KBr,
20 W. Herwig and H.H. Zeiss, J. Org. Chem., 1958, 23, 1404.