W. Lin et al. / Dyes and Pigments 136 (2017) 791e797
793
chloropropane-1,2-diol (3.96 g, 36 mmol) in ethanol (5 mL) was
added and the resulting blend was stirred and heated at reflux for
4 h before cooled to room temperature. Then the resulting solution
was poured into water (100 mL) and was extracted with ethyl ac-
etate, the organic layers were dried over MgSO4. After the solvent
was evaporated under reduced pressure, the residue was purified
by silica column chromatography using a mixture of ethanol/ethyl
acetate (v: v ¼ 1: 5) as the eluent to give white solid DH. Yield: 81%.
1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6, d (ppm)): 2.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.43 (d,
6H, OCH2), 3.80 (m, 6H, OH), 3.95 (m, 3H, CH), 4.67 (d, 3H, higher
field branch of AB quartet, CH2OH), 4.95 (d, 3H, lower field branch
of AB quartet, CH2OH), 6.82 (d, 6H, ArH), 6.91 (d, 6H, ArH). 13C NMR
(125 MHz, DMSO-d6, d (ppm)): 157.2, 141.8, 129.7, 114.1, 70.5, 69.9,
63.2, 50.6, 30.9. Elemental analysis calcd (%) for C29H36O9: C, 65.89;
H, 6.86; Found: C, 65.52, H, 7.06. MS (ESI): exact mass calcd for
the polymeric host matrix PVPh, and then the solid mixtures were
dissolved into cyclopentanone (8% of total solid weight). Mean-
while, six-branched chromophore SN was dissolved into cyclo-
pentanone directly at same ratio without polymeric host matrix for
large molecular weight of SN. The mixed solutions were stirred for
1 h and filtered by 0.22 mm Teflon membrane filters. After that, the
resulting solutions were spin-coated on the indium-tin oxide (ITO)
glass substrates to fabricate Film-N1, Film-DN and Film-SN.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis and characterization
For the strong inter-chromophore dipole-dipole interactions,
high hyperpolarisability (b) is hard to convert to large macroscopic
C
29H36O9 [MþH]þ, 527.20. Found: 527.90.
optical nonlinearity. To reduce the inter-chromophore dipole-
dipole electrostatic interactions through the site-isolation effect
from dendritic structures, bichromophore DN and six-branched
chromophore SN are synthesized from monochromophore N1.
The detailed synthetic routes to bichromophore DN and six-
branched chromophore SN are shown in Scheme 1.
2.7. Synthesis of compound 3
The chromophore N1 (0.36 g, 1 mmol), succinic anhydride
(0.15 g, 1.5 mmol), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) (0.13 g,
1 mmol) and pyridine (2 mL) were dissolved in anhydrous CH2Cl2
and stirring was continued at room temperature overnight. Then
the resulting solution was washed with brine and deionized water.
The organic layer was extracted by CH2Cl2 and dried over MgSO4.
After the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure, the
residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel using
a mixture of CH2Cl2/ethyl acetate (v: v ¼ 10: 1) as the eluent and
compound 3 was gained. Yield: 74%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6,
The Knoevenagel reaction between 4-((2-hydroxyethyl)
(methyl)amino)benzaldehyde and TCF acceptor 2-(3-cyano-4,5,5-
trimethylfuran-2 (5H)-ylidene)malononitrile afforded chromo-
phore N1. Besides, 5-hydroxyisophthalic acid and tert-butyl-
chlorodimethylsilane produced compound 1, then it was reacted
with AcOH to create compound 2 with a functional terminal group.
Under EDCꢁHCl coupling conditions, bichromophore DN was pre-
pared by chromophore N1 attaching to the compound 2 via ester-
ification reaction in which 4-(dimethylamino)-pyridine (DMAP)
acted as a catalyst. As for six-branched chromophore SN, the tether
core DH was produced by Williamson ester reaction of 4,40,400-
(ethane-1,1,1-triyl)triphenol and 3-chloropropane-1,2-diol. Then,
carboxylic acid functionalized chromophore 3, which synthesized
from monochromophore and succinic anhydride, attached to tether
core DH through esterification to obtain six-branched chromo-
phore SN. The structures of N1, DN and SN were confirmed by 1H
NMR, FT-IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis and mass spectrom-
etry. The details of the synthesis and characterizations were
described in the Experimental Section.
Thermal properties of chromophore N1, DN and SN were studied
by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermalgravimetric
analysis (TGA). The melting point (Tm) of chromophore N1 was
276 ꢂC, while bichromophore DN and six-branched SN showed
glass transition temperatures (Tg) at about 115 ꢂC and 129 ꢂC
without melting point. Compared with DN, SN exhibited higher Tg
for its larger molecular weight and more rigid structure resulting in
bigger limitation of movement. The decomposition temperatures
(Td) of chromophore N1 and DN were 281 ꢂC and 313 ꢂC respec-
tively (Fig. 2) indicating connecting two chromophores could
improve thermal stability. However, the Td of SN dropped to 265 ꢂC
due to the star-shaped structure and two adjacent ester groups
which connected monochromophores and DH to form SN. The star-
shaped structure was influenced greatly by temperature and the
bonds of two adjacent ester groups were destroyed easily resulting
in low Td of SN.
d
ppm): 1.76 (s, 6H, C(CH3)2), 2.34 (d, 2H, COCH2), 2.41 (m, 2H,
CH2COOH), 3.10 (m, 3H, NCH3), 3.77 (d, 2H, NCH2), 4.23 (d, 2H,
CH2O), 6.87e6.91 (d, 3H, ArH, CH]CH), 7.78 (d, 2H, ArH), 7.91 (d,
1H, CH]CH, J ¼ 15.8 Hz). MS (ESI): exact mass calcd for C25H24N4O5
[MꢀH]ꢀ: 459.1. Found: 459.1.
2.8. Synthesis of six-branched chromophore SN
Compound 3 (0.49 g, 1.05 mmol) and DH (0.079 g, 0.15 mmol)
were dissolved in mixed solution THF/CH2Cl2 (25 mL/75 mL). The
mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h after the addition
of EDCꢁHCl (0.30 g, 1.58 mmol) and 4-dimethylaminopyridine
(DMAP; 0.037 g, 0.3 mmol). The reacting solution was evaporated
and the residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (150 mL). Then the organic
phase was washed with brine and water. After the resulting solu-
tion was dried over MgSO4 and concentrated, the products were
obtained via flash chromatography on silica gel using a mixture of
CH2Cl2/THF (v:v ¼ 25:1) as the eluent. Yield: 82%. 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3, d ppm): 1.74 (s, 36H, C(CH3)2), 2.04 (d, 3H, CCH3),
2.59 (m, 24H, COCH2), 3.13 (s, 18H, NCH3), 3.74 (t, 12H, NCH2), 4.05
(d, 6H, CCH2O), 4.30 (s, 15H, OCH2; higher field branch of AB
quartet, ArOCH2), 4.41 (d, 3H, lower field branch of AB quartet, Ar-
O-CH2), 5.37 (s, 3H, CHCH2), 6.76 (m, 24H, ArH; CH]CH, J ¼ 16 Hz),
6.93 (d, 6H, ArH), 7.55 (d, 12H, ArH), 7.61 (d, 6H, CH]CH, J ¼ 16 Hz).
13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3,
d ppm): 176.5, 174.7, 172.3, 156.5, 153.2,
148.6, 142.5, 132.5, 129.9, 122.6, 114.0, 112.9, 112.7, 112.2, 111.7, 109.5,
97.3, 94.9, 70.3, 66.2, 62.9, 61.7, 54.9, 50.9, 39.2, 30.6, 29.1, 28.9, 26.9.
FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 2223 (s), 1734 (s), 1521 (m), 1377 (s), 1279 (m),
1167 (m), 962 (w), 816 (w), 730 (w), 653 (w). Elemental analysis
calcd (%) for C179H168N24O33 (%): C, 67.54; H, 5.32; N, 10.56. Found:
C, 67.41; H, 5.92; N, 9.78. MS (ESI): exact mass calcd for
3.2. Linear and nonlinear optical properties
The linear optical properties of N1, DN and SN were performed
by UVevisible absorption spectra. The maximum absorption
wavelengths (lmax) of chromophore N1, DN and SN were 586 nm,
574 nm and 568 nm in DMF, indicating the absorption of chro-
mophore shifted bluely with the increase of chromophoric branch
(Fig. 3). Compared with chromophore N1, multichromophore
C
179H168N24O33 [M]:3183.39. Found: 3182.93.
2.9. Preparation of films
Monochromophore N1 and bichromophore DN were doped into