the two receptors. For example, the gain in affinity of
the (2S,3S) enantiomer was greater at b1AR than b2AR.
This unexpected observation may suggest a complementary
binding mode for the two enantiomers, and we are currently
investigating this possibility further.
In conclusion we have developed a highly efficient asymmetric
synthesis of ICI 118,551, and confirmed conclusively that the
(2S,3S) enantiomer is the most potent. While varying in
activities the 2S,3S and 2R,3R enantiomers are both selective
for the b2-adrenoceptor over the b1-adrenoceptor. We are
currently investigating the apparent drop in selectivity shown
by the individual enantiomers relative to the racemate.
We would like to thank RCUK and the Dorset Foundation
for funding, the EPSRC mass spectrometry service, and Prof.
Derek Tocher for obtaining the crystallography data.
Scheme 1 Asymmetric synthesis and crystal structure of (2S,3S)-ICI
Notes and references
118,551. Hydrogens shown on chiral centres for clarity.
1 T. Warne, M. J. Serrano-Vega, J. G. Baker, R. Moukhametzianov,
P. C. Edwards, R. Henderson, A. G. W. Leslie, C. G. Tate and
G. F. X. Schertler, Nature, 2008, 454, 486–491.
2 S. G. F. Rasmussen, H. J. Choi, D. M. Rosenbaum, T. S. Kobilka,
F. S. Thian, P. C. Edwards, M. Burghammer, V. R. P. Ratnala,
R. Sanishvili, R. F. Fischetti, G. F. X. Schertler, W. I. Weis and
B. K. Kobilka, Nature, 2007, 450, 383–384.
3 V. Cherezov, D. M. Rosenbaum, M. A. Hanson, S. G.
F. Rasmussen, F. S. Thian, T. S. Kobilka, H. J. Choi, P. Kuhn,
W. I. Weis, B. K. Kobilka and R. C. Stevens, Science, 2007, 318,
1258–1265.
4 D. M. Rosenbaum, V. Cherezov, M. A. Hanson, S. G. F.
Rasmussen, F. S. Thian, T. S. Kobilka, H. J. Choi, X. J. Yao,
W. I. Weis, R. C. Stevens and B. K. Kobilka, Science, 2007, 318,
1266–1273.
Table 1 The binding affinities (pKi) of racemic and enantiopure
preparations of ICI-118,551 for b1AR and b2AR, and their b2AR/
b1AR-selectivity ratios, as determined by [3H]CGP-12177 competition
binding
pKi
b2AR-selectivity
ratio
b1AR
b2AR
Preparation
n
(ꢀ)-ICI-118,551
3
4
3
6.54 ꢀ 0.09 9.22 ꢀ 0.1 474
7.51 ꢀ 0.13 9.27 ꢀ 0.06 58
5.63 ꢀ 0.16 8.00 ꢀ 0.06 234
(2S,3S)-ICI-118,551
(2R,3R)-ICI-118,551
By simply changing the chiral ligand in the Sharpless
epoxidation to L-(+)-diisopropyltartrate we repeated this
synthesis to afford (2R,3R)-ICI 118,551. The two enantiomers
of ICI 118,551, in addition to the racemate,15 were then tested
for their activity and selectivity for the b1AR vs. b2AR. This
was carried out using a [3H]CGP-12177 competition assay on
HEK293 membranes expressing either b1AR or b2AR.
(ꢀ)-ICI-118,551 bound with high affinity to b2AR and
considerably lower affinity to b1AR, giving it a b2AR/b1AR
selectivity ratio of 474 (Table 1). These results are in good
agreement with those previously published.9,17 At both bARs
(2S,3S)-ICI-118,551 was found to bind with higher affinity,
and (2R,3R)-ICI-118,551 was found to bind with lower affinity,
than the racemate. The differences in pKi values between the
two enantiomers were highly statistically significant at both
the receptors. We can thus conclusively confirm that the
(2S,3S) enantiomer has the greatest bAR binding affinity.
Interestingly, for both enantiomers the b2AR-selectivity was
found to be lower compared to the racemate. This was due to
the relative changes in binding affinity being nonequivalent at
5 R. Adorisio, L. De Luca, J. Rossi and M. Gheorghiade, Heart
Failure Rev., 2006, 11, 109–123.
6 A. Hjalmarson and G. Olsson, Circulation, 1991, 84, 101–107.
7 S. Goldstein, Arch. Intern. Med., 1996, 156, 1267–1276.
8 H. Tucker, Eur. Pat., Appl. No. 79300169.4, 1979.
9 J. G. Baker, Br. J. Pharmacol., 2005, 144, 317–322.
10 A. J. Bilski, S. E. Halliday, J. D. Fitz Gerald and J. L. Wale,
J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol., 1983, 5, 430–437.
11 G. G. Pegg, T. W. Badran, A. J. Hoey, C. M. Jackson and
M. N. Sillence, Aust. J. Chem., 1999, 52, 153–155.
12 CAS have confirmed this to be the case following communication
with the authors of this paper and have now moved the name ICI
118551 to a different record, RN 72795-26-7, which reflects the
correct S*,S* stereochemistry.
13 K. E. Furse and T. P. Lybrand, J. Med. Chem., 2003, 46,
4450–4462.
14 M. G. Quaglia, N. Desideri, E. Bossu, A. Farina and
L. A. Morrone, J. Chromatogr., A, 1994, 666, 289–293.
15 The racemate was accessed by making up a 1 : 1 mixture of the
two enantiomers.
16 Y. Gao, R. M. Hanson, J. M. Klunder, S. Y. Ko, H. Masamune
and K. B. Sharpless, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109,
5765–5780.
17 C. Smith and M. Teitler, Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther., 1999, 13,
123–126.
ꢁc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
3954 | Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3953–3954