Organic Letters
Letter
toward the synthesis of the Calycanthaceae alkaloid,
( )-folicanthine.
Table 1. Selected Optimization Results of the One-Step
Cyclization-Dimerization Cascade Sequence
a
X =
yield of 10a
yield of 11a
entry
H/OH
oxidant
equiv
0.50
(%)
(%)
b
1
H
Mn(OAc)3·
2H2O
Mn(OAc)3·
2H2O
Mn(OAc)3·
2H2O
Mn(OAc)3·
2H2O
53
37
92
81
32
11
−
b
2
OH
H
0.50
3.0
cd
,
3
ce
,
4
OH
3.0
−
a
Isolated yields as an ∼1:1 mixture of separable meso:( )-D,L-
Figure 3. Our approach for the one-step synthesis of bisoxindoles
from acyclic precursors.
b
c
d
diastereomers. Under air. Under argon. ACN as the solvent, reflux.
e
THF as the solvent (vigorous reflux).
In conceptualizing our one-step strategy, we identified three
key disconnections (Figure 3). Namely, the formation of the
desired bisoxindole 10 from the homocoupling of methine
radical 9 (Figure 3a), generated in turn via a homolytic
fragmentation of a suitable oxindole 7/8 (Figure 3b), that
could be obtained using an oxidative cross-dehydrogenative
cyclization reaction (Figure 3c). The cross-dehydrogenative
cyclization10 and the homocoupling steps6 are well-established
as independent transformations in the literature and therefore
the only consideration remaining was selecting an appropriate
group Z (Figure 3), as a delayed radical precursorstable
enough to promote the oxidative cross-dehydrogenative
cyclization, but labile enough to afford radical intermediate 9
in the subsequent step of the cascade sequence. This led us to
identify oxoanilides 5 and 6 (where Z = formyl (5) and
carboxylic acid (6)), respectively, Figure 3), as key starting
materials since both cross-dehydrogenative cyclizations of
related oxoanilides,10 as well as oxidative deformylation11,12
and decarboxylation13 processes, have been reported in the
literature. Furthermore, we considered the relative stability of
starting materials 5 and 6, and by extension accessing the
related oxindoles 7 and 8, to be more attractive throughout the
entire envisage cascade, when compared to other functional
groups for the homolytic generation of radical 9.14 It is
noteworthy to mention that aldehydes 5 are remarkably
stableup to 6 months refrigerated and up to 1 week of bench
storageand their syntheses are often shorter than the related
Table 1 shows selected results of our optimization studies
using oxoanilides 5a and 6a as model substrates (see Table S1
in the Supporting Information for full data). We initially set
out to develop a metal-catalyzed process as either via a
deformylative or decarboxylative strategy and using air as the
terminal oxidant to regenerate the active catalyst15 for each
requisite oxidation step.
In the event, using a 50 mol % catalyst loading of
Mn(OAc)3·2H2O (∼17 mol % per oxidation step) produced
the desired bisoxindole 10a in 53% and 37% yield, from the
corresponding aldehyde (5a) and acid (6a), respectively,
together with a 32% and 11% yield of hydroxyoxindole 11a,
respectively (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). It quickly became clear
that the interception of methine radical 9a (Figure 3) by O2
under the aerobic conditions in the formation of 11a, rather
than the desired homocoupling, was a significant competing
process. Gratifyingly, switching to an anaerobic system and
using a stoichiometric amount of oxidant, albeit 1 equiv per
requisite oxidation step, ultimately (and following solvent
optimization; Table S2 in the Supporting Information),
produced the ideal set of conditions for both aldehyde 5a
and carboxylic acid 6a, affording 10a in 92% and 81% yield,
respectively (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). With these conditions
in hand, we explored the substrate scope of the cascade
sequence utilizing both starting materials (Scheme 1), paying
attention to any distinct advantages between the deformylative
(5) and decarboxylative (6) strategies.
Various alkyl groups (R1) were well-tolerated, producing
bisoxindoles 10a−10h in yields of 56%−93%. Modification of
the protecting group (R2) on the aniline afforded the N-benzyl
protected bisoxindole 10i in yields of 90% and 91%, from the
corresponding aldehyde and carboxylic acid, respectively.
Variation of the substituents around the aromatic ring (R3)
utilizing halides, electron-withdrawing, and electron-releasing
groups, afforded 10j−10q in 70%−96% yield as well as
disubstituted bisoxindoles 10r−10s in 59%−95% yield. All
things considered, these two strategies, namely, via a
deformylative or decarboxylative fragmentation, appear largely
complementary. A specific point of difference encountered
during the course of our work, however, was found in the
synthesis of bisoxindole 10t, which was produced in 65% yield
from acid 6t. Conversely, 10t could not be accessed via the
corresponding aldehyde 5t as its synthesis via our prescribed
formylation failed.
The proposed mechanism of the reaction, using the
formation of 10a as a representative example, is shown in
oxidative cross-dehydrogenative cyclization step likely pro-
ceeds in accordance with current mechanistic thinking,
involving conversion to oxindoles 7a/8a, from 5a/6a,
respectively, via two sequential oxidative single electron
transfer (SET) processes.10 Following deprotonation of 8a to
the corresponding carboxylate anion, a third oxidative SET
process generates methine radical 9a with concomitant loss of
5467
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 5466−5470