C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Aliphatic aldehyde-derived hydrazone 7 is also a successful
substrate, albeit one that requires extended reaction times and/or
elevated temperatures (Scheme 3). Despite the sluggish rate of these
reactions, products 8-10 may be accessed with good to excellent
yields and enantioselectivities. Aromatic aldehyde-derived hydra-
zones have thus far proven unreactive.
without precedent in the long and illustrious history of the
Diels-Alder reaction and its variants.
Reductive cleavage of the N-N bond in the hydrazide
8
products with SmI2 requires prior acylation in a modification
of the Friestad procedure.9 Thus, benzoylation of ent-10a
[prepared as in Scheme 3 using (S,S)-1] followed by reduction
with SmI2 gave 17 in 56% yield (Scheme 5). We also discovered
an interesting alternative when an attempt to methylate the
pivalamide nitrogen of ent-10a unexpectedly delivered 18.
Reduction of 18 with SmI2 proceeded smoothly to give 19 in
70% overall yield.
Scheme 3
Scheme 5
To further expand the scope with respect to the diene structure
and to access more structural and stereochemical complexity in
the products, dienes having the general structures 11 and 12 were
investigated (Scheme 4). While such dienes have been exten-
sively studied in Diels-Alder reactions (and with only two
exceptions5 react to give the regioisomer expected from stereo-
electronic considerations), next to no information is available
regarding the corresponding ADA reactions.6 Reactions of dienes
11a and 11b with the complex formed from 2e and (R,R)-1 led
to 13a and 13b, respectively. The products were formed with
complete regio- and diastereoselectivity and in 83 and 86% ee,
respectively. Interestingly, however, dienes 12a and 12b exhib-
ited reversed regioselectivity, leading to 14a and 14b, respec-
tively, as the major products of reactions that appear to be
governed by the minimization of steric interactions in the initial
C-C bond formation. While the regio- and diastereoselectivities
in these reactions were not as high, the reactions are nevertheless
preparatively useful, as 14a was isolated pure in 61% yield and
97% ee and 14b in 57% yield and 95% ee. Perhaps even more
remarkably, a remote methoxy group reestablished the supremacy
of electronic control in the dihydronaphthalene series, as the
reaction of 12c with the complex formed from 15 and (R,R)-1
produced 16 (7:1 regioselectivity, 9:1 diastereoselectivity), albeit
with reduced enantioselectivity.7 After purification, 16 was
isolated in 66% yield and 77% ee. Either regioisomer (14 or
16) is thus available based solely on variation of a remote
substituent on the diene 12, a phenomenon that appears to be
We have described the development of enantioselective (formal)
ADA reactions with non-Danishefsky-type dienes promoted by a
silicon Lewis acid. Both glyoxylate- and aliphatic aldehyde-derived
hydrazones may be employed, and a reasonably wide scope with
regard to diene structure has been demonstrated as well, giving
access to a diverse array of piperidine derivatives.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by Grant CHE-
08-09659 from the National Science Foundation. U.K.T is the
recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship (F32 GM077937) from
the NIH/NIGMS, and S.K.L. is a National Science Foundation
Graduate Research Fellow. We thank Prof. Gerard Parkin and
Mr. Aaron Sattler for X-ray structure analyses (see the Sup-
porting Information), and the National Science Foundation
(CHE-06-19638) is thanked for funding to acquire an X-ray
diffractometer.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
characterization data, stereochemical proofs, and crystallographic
data (CIF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) (a) Kobayashi, S.; Ishitani, H. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 1069. (b) Jorgensen,
K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 3558. (c) Buonora, P.; Olsen, J.-
C.; Oh, T. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 6099. (d) Heintzelman, G. R.; Meigh,
I. R.; Mahajan, Y. R.; Weinreb, S. M. Org. React. 2005, 65, 141. (e)
Rowland, G. B.; Rowland, E. B.; Zhang, Q.; Antilla, J. C. Curr. Org.
Chem. 2006, 10, 981.
Scheme 4
(2) (a) Hattori, K.; Yamamoto, H. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 1749. (b) Ishihara,
K.; Miyata, M.; Hattori, K.; Tada, T.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1994, 116, 10520. (c) Kobayashi, S.; Komiyama, S.; Ishitani, H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 979. (d) Yao, S.; Johannsen, M.; Hazell, R. G.;
Jørgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 3121. (e) Bromidge,
S.; Wilson, P. C.; Whiting, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8905. (f) Yao,
S.; Saaby, S.; Hazell, R. G.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem.sEur. J. 2000, 6,
2435. (g) Josephsohn, N. S.; Snapper, M. L.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4018. (h) Manchen˜o, O. G.; Arraya´s, R. G.;
Carretero, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 456. (i) Guillarme, S.;
Whiting, A. Synlett 2004, 711. (j) Yamashita, Y.; Mizuki, Y.; Kobayashi,
S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1803. (k) Sunde´n, H.; Ibrahem, I.; Eriksson,
L.; Co´rdova, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4877. (l) Itoh, J.;
Fuchibe, K.; Akiyama, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4796. (m)
Rueping, M.; Azap, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7832. (n)
Akiyama, T.; Tamura, Y.; Itoh, J.; Morita, H.; Fuchibe, K. Synlett 2006,
141. (o) Liu, H.; Cun, L.-F.; Mi, A.-Q.; Jiang, Y.-Z.; Gong, L.-Z. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 6023. (p) Newman, C. A.; Antilla, J. C.; Chen, P.; Predeus,
A. V.; Fielding, L.; Wulff, W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7216. (q)
Shang, D.; Xin, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Liu, X.; Feng, X. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 73, 630. (r) Lee, S. K.; Tambar, U. K.; Perl, N. R.; Leighton, J. L.
Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 4769.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 30, 2010 10249