3980
A. Basak et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 3977–3981
Figure 3. Models showing SKI-1 catalytic domain (right) and the docking of compound 2b with SKI-1 catalytic region (left).
(100
l
M) in buffer [25 mM Tris + 25 mM Mes + 2 mM CaCl2, pH
L in 96-well plate. For determination
Acknowledgments
7.4] in a total volume of 100
l
of Ki values, each inhibitor concentration was varied over a range
wide enough to yield residual activities of 20–80% of control value
following incubation with SKI-1 enzyme. Typically h-SKI-1 sample
The authors Amit B. and D.M. are grateful to CSIR, Government
of India for research funding and fellowship, respectively. D.S.T. is
thanked for the funds for 400 MHz NMR facility under the IRPHA
program. Ajoy B. sincerely thanks National Sciences and Engineer-
ing Research Council, Government of Canada for a research grant
under discovery program.
(10
ume 100
l
L) and substrate (10
l
L) were incubated in buffer (total vol-
L) of varying concentrations
lL) with each inhibitor (2
l
in 96-well micro-titer plate at 37 °C. The rate of substrate hydroly-
sis was obtained from the changes in fluorescence readings and the
values transformed into amounts of lmol/h of peptide cleaved by
References and notes
using standard curve and the measured quenching corrections as
we did previously.16 Non-linear regression analysis of plots of the
hydrolysis rate versus the inhibitor concentration was used. In all
cases the inhibition is mostly competitive in nature as determined
by Dixon plots (Fig. 2). The inhibition constant Ki (Table 2) was
measured using three different concentrations (100, 50, and
1. Richards, F. M.; Wyckoff, H. W. The Enzymes, 3rd ed.; Academic press: New
York, 1971. p 647.
2. Raines, R. T. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1045.
3. Fett, J. W.; Strydom, D. J.; Lobb, R. R.; Alderman, E. M.; Bethune, J. L.; Riordan, J.
F.; Vallee, B. L. Biochemistry 1985, 20, 5480.
4. Sorrentino, S.; Glitz, D. G.; Hamann, K. J.; Loegering, D. A.; Checkel, J. L.; Gleich,
G. J. J. Biol. Chem. 1992, 267, 14859.
25
l
M) of Q-GPC251–263
.
5. Matousek, J. Comp. Biochem. Phys. C 2001, 129, 175.
From this table we find that all the compounds have inhibition
6. Seidah, N. G.; Benjannet, S.; Hamelin, J.; Mamarbachi, A. M.; Basak, A.;
Marcinkiewicz, J.; Mbikay, M.; Chrétien, M.; Marcinkiewicz, M. Ann. N.Y. Acad.
Sci. 1999, 885, 57.
7. Seidah, N. G.; Mayer, G.; Zaid, A.; Rousselet, E.; Nassoury, N.; Poirier, S.;
Essalmani, R.; Prat, A. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2008, 40, 1111.
8. Seidah, N. G.; Mowla, S. J.; Hamelin, J.; Mamarbachi, A. M.; Benjannet, S.; Touré,
B. B.; Basak, A.; Munzer, J. S.; Marcinkiewicz, J.; Zhong, M.; Barale, J. C.; Lazure,
C.; Murphy, R. A.; Chrétien, M.; Marcinkiewicz, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
1999, 96, 1321.
9. Cheng, D.; Espenshade, P. J.; Slaughter, C. A.; Jaen, J. C.; Brown, M. S.; Goldstein,
J. L. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 22805.
10. Seidah, N. G.; Benjannet, S.; Wickham, L.; Marcinkiewicz, J.; Jasmin, S. B.;
Stifani, S.; Basak, A.; Prat, A.; Chretien, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100,
928.
11. Nagahama, M.; Taniguchi, T.; Hashimoto, E.; Imamaki, A.; Mori, K.; Tsuji, A.;
Matsuda, Y. FEBS Lett. 1998, 434, 155.
12. Mohottalage, D.; Goto, N.; Basak, A. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2009, 611, 83.
13. Fan, D.; Yancey, P. G.; Qiu, S.; Ding, L.; Weeber, E. J.; Linton, M. F.; Fazio, S.
Biochemistry 2008, 47, 1631.
14. Bontemps, Y.; Scamuffa, N.; Calvo, F.; Khatib, A. M. Med. Res. Rev. 2007, 27, 631.
15. Chrétien, M.; Seidah, N. G.; Basak, A.; Mbikay, M. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets
2008, 12, 1289.
16. Basak, A.; Mohottalage, D.; Basak, A. Protein Pept. Lett. 2006, 13, 863.
17. (a) Basak, A.; Mitra, D.; Kar, M.; Biradha, K. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3067; (b) Kar,
M.; Basak, A. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2861.
with IC50 or Ki in the micromolar range with compound 1b being
the most potent inhibitor. Unlike the highly reactive peptidyl-
cmk (chloromethyl ketone) derivatives,20 the azo-compound deriv-
atives did not exhibit any significant inhibition of Furin at 100 lM
or lower concentrations. We have also performed the docking
study so as to compare the in vitro and in silico results. For that,
we used Autodock version 3.0.5 program. It was observed from
the Swiss PDB Viewer that no direct H-bonding interactions oc-
curred with SKI-1 active site residues, but other stabilizing interac-
tions occurred in the active site region especially with the catalytic
218Asp, 249His, 414Ser, and 338Asn residues (Fig. 3). H-bonding and
other polar interactions occurred with nearby residues (not shown
in the figure). As docking occurred in the active site region of SKI-1
(in case of compound 2b as an example), it suggested to a compet-
itive inhibition. In reality also, this compound showed competitive
inhibition. Thus our docking experiment supported in vitro study.
Figure 3 represents theoretical active site structure of the SKI-1 en-
zyme (right) and the docking result with compound 2b (left).
Thus we have successfully synthesized novel C2-symmetric azo-
benzene-amino acid conjugates which showed modest to good
inhibitory activities against SKI-1 enzyme in a competitive manner.
Efforts are currently underway to evaluate their ex vivo activities
using specific cell lines. Previously it was demonstrated that simi-
lar C2-symmetric bis-azo compounds such as 2,20-azobis(2-amidi-
nopropane hydrochloride can cause peroxidation of rat liver
microsomes21 but no report of their protease inhibitory activity to-
wards SKI-1 was ever reported. Therefore this may provide an
alternate strategy for design of more selective and potent inhibi-
tors of SKI-1 that may find useful therapeutic and biochemical
applications.
18. Dreostic, I. E.; Wargovich, M. J.; Yang, C. S. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 1997, 37, 761.
19. Initially we decided to go with the E-forms only for comparison purpose but
other isoform (Z-form) will also be tested in future study.
20. Pasquato, A.; Pullikotil, P.; Asselin, M. C.; Vacatello, M.; Paolillo, L.; Ghezzo, F.;
Basso, F.; Di Bello, C.; Dettin, M.; Seidah, N. G. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 23471.
21. Cai, Y.; Ma, L.; Hou, L.; Zhou, B.; Yang, L.; Liu, Z. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2002, 120,
109.
Spectral data of selected compounds (IR data taken in KBr pellet and expressed in
cmꢀ1 1H NMR and 13C NMR were recorded at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively,
,
in CDCl3 unless stated otherwise):
1a: max 3376, 2966, 1728, 1646, 1542, 1285, 1056; dH (d6-DMSO) 12.87 (2H, br
t
s), 7.83 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.57 (2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.42 (2H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.00
(2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 6.95 (2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 4.76 (4H, s), 4.23 (2H, m), 1.99 (2H,
m), 0.76 (6H, d, J = 6.8 Hz), 0.71 (6H, d, J = 6.8 Hz); dC (d6-DMSO) 173.0, 168.0,
155.6, 142.1, 133.3, 121.9, 117.0, 115.4, 67.9, 56.8, 30.6, 19.4, 17.9; mass (ES+)