B. Chatelet et al. / Catalysis Communications 52 (2014) 26–30
27
pyrogallol with nBu4NI co-catalyst led to a very efficient catalytic system
able to operate under solvent-free and relatively mild reaction conditions
(25–45 °C, PCO2 = 10 bar, 2–5 mol% catalyst), thus fulfilling some of the
criteria towards sustainability [4]. The authors attributed this improve-
ment to both synergistic and stabilizing effects provided by the polyphe-
nolic structures through multiple hydrogen-bonding.
In our effort to contribute to the overall trend for clean and effective
CO2 conversion, we have recently described the use of azaphosphatranes
(AZAPs), which are the acidic conjugates of the Verkade's superbases
[27–29], as efficient single-component, metal-free catalysts for the syn-
thesis of cyclic carbonates from CO2 and epoxides (Scheme 1) [30]. In
that work, we showed that these organocatalysts were able to operate
under low CO2 pressures and relatively mild temperatures (1 bar, 80–
100 °C) even at catalyst loadings of 0.1 mol%. We also demonstrated
that the presence of bulky substituents on the equatorial nitrogen atoms
strongly correlate with higher catalyst activity and stability over several
days of reaction. Based on kinetic studies and previous literature prece-
dents [31,32] we proposed a mechanism which involves the insertion of
CO2 into the P\N bond of the AZAP unit as the rate determining step.1
In the present contribution, we wish to further explore the different
aspects of the catalyst structural dependence through careful ad-
justment of the substitution patterns around the phosphorus site. As
we shall see, the pre-organization of the active site through hydrogen-
bonding will lead to the creation of highly reactive pockets with im-
proved performance in the cycloaddition of CO2 to epoxides.
Scheme 1. Coupling of styrene oxide with CO2 catalyzed by azaphosphatranes (R = alkyl
or aromatic moieties).
1H NMR (CDCl3, 298 K, 500.1 MHz): δ 6.41 (d, 3JH–F = 9.18 Hz, 6H,
ArH); 3.76 (s, 9H, ArOCH3); 3.75 (s, 6H, ArCH2N); 2.58 (t, 3J =
6.01 Hz, 6H, N(CH2)2N); 2.50 (t, 3J = 5.80 Hz, 6H, N(CH2)2N).
13C NMR (CDCl3, 298 K, 125.7 MHz) δ 163.2 (d, J = 12.6 Hz, CAr);
161.2 (d, J = 12.6 Hz, CAr); 160.0 (t, J = 14.6 Hz,CAr); 97.7 (d, J =
30.4 Hz, CArH); 55.7 (OCH3); 54.4 (ArCH2N); 46.5 (NCH2CH2N); 40.2
(NCH2CH2N).
19F NMR (CDCl3, 298 K, 282.2 MHz): δ −115 ppm.
2.1.2. Compound 1b
In an ice-bath cooled round bottom flask, tris(dimethylamino)phos-
phine (0.410 mL, 2.25 mmol) was dissolved in acetonitrile (15 mL).
Phosphorus trichloride (98 μL, 1.12 mmol) was then added drop-wise.
The reaction mixture was vigorously stirred at 0 °C for 0.5 h, and a solu-
tion of tris(2,6-difluoro-4-methoxybenzyl)tren (1.88 g, 3.06 mmol) in
acetonitrile (10 mL) was added drop-wise. The reaction mixture was
then stirred overnight at room temperature. The solvent was removed
under reduced pressure and the crude compound was chroma-
tographed on silica gel eluting with CHCl3/MeOH 15/1 to give pure 1b
as an off-white powder (1.01 g, 49% yield).
2. Experimental
Commercial reagents were used without further purifications. 1H,
13C, 31P and 19F NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker spectrometers
at 500.1, 125.7, 202.4 and 282.2 MHz respectively. Chemical shifts (δ)
are referenced with respect to TMS (1H, 13C), H3PO4 85% (31P) or TFA
ESI-HRMS m/z calcd for C30H34F6N4O3P (M+) 643.2267, found
643.2236.
(
19F). Compounds 1a and 1c were synthesized according to literature
1H NMR (CDCl3, 298 K, 500.1 MHz): δ 6.48 (d, 3JH–F = 9.57 Hz, 6H,
ArH), 6.00 (d, 1JP–H = 508 Hz, 1H, P–H); 4.09 (d, 3JP–H = 14.60 Hz, 6H,
ArCH2N); 3.79 (s, 9H, ArOCH3); 3.49–3.46 (m, 6H, N(CH2)2N); 2.97–
2.92 (m, 6H, N(CH2)2N).
procedures [33,34]. Yields were estimated during catalytic runs by 1H
NMR with a Bruker Avance 300 spectrometer at 300.1 MHz. Mass spec-
tra were performed by the Service Central d'Analyses, CNRS, France. CO2
of a purity of 99.99% was commercially available and used without fur-
ther purification.
13C NMR (CDCl3, 298 K, 125.7 MHz): δ 163.2 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, CAr);
161.2 (d, J = 11.7 Hz, CAr); 105.2 (m, CAr); 98.2 (d, J = 29.06 Hz,
CArH); 55.9 (OCH3); 46.6 (d, J = 7.09 Hz, N(CH2)2N); 38.5 (d, J =
6.71 Hz, N(CH2)2N); 38.1 (d, J = 20.4 Hz, ArCH2N).
2.1. Syntheses of new compounds
31P NMR (CDCl3, 298 K, 202.4 MHz) δ: −14.4 (d, 1JP–H = 508 Hz).
19F NMR (CDCl3, 298 K, 282.2 MHz): δ −114.6 ppm.
2.1.1. Tris(2,6-difluoro-4-methoxybenzyl)tren
In a round bottom flask, tris(2-aminoethyl)amine (tren) (546 mg,
3.74 mmol) was dissolved in methanol (10 mL) and ice-bath cooled.
Then, a solution of 2,6-difluoro-4-methoxybenzaldehyde (2.00 g,
11.60 mmol, 3.1 eq) in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of chloroform/methanol
(10 mL) was added drop-wise. The reaction was slowly warmed up to
room temperature and stirred overnight. Methanol (10 mL) was then
added. Subsequent portions of NaBH4 (878 mg, 23.20 mmol) were
added to the ice-cooled mixture over a thirty-minute period and the
mixture was stirred for another hour. Solvents were evaporated. A solu-
tion of 10% NaOH in water was added (25 mL), and the resulting mix-
ture was extracted with toluene (3 × 30 mL). The combined organic
phases were extracted with HCl 1 M (3 × 50 mL) and the combined
aqueous phases were then basified with an aqueous 10% NaOH solution.
The solution was then extracted with toluene (3 × 100 mL) and the
organic layers were dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and the solvent was re-
moved under reduced pressure to give a pale yellow oil (1.88 g, 82%).
ESI-HRMS m/z calcd for C30H37F6N4O3 (MH+) 615.2764, found
615.2745.
2.2. Catalytic procedures
Reactions were carried out in a 5 mL Schlenk tube equipped with
a rubber septum. In a typical run, the reactor was charged with
50 mmol of styrene oxide (SO), 0.05 mmol of catalyst (1a–c) and 2,4-
dibromo-mesitylene used as an internal standard. Carbon dioxide was
first bubbled into the solution for 5 min to saturate the liquid phase. A
balloon filled with carbon dioxide was then connected to the Schlenk
through a needle to maintain a constant atmosphere of carbon dioxide
during the course of the reaction. The mixture was placed in a thermo-
static oil bath at the required temperature and stirred at a stirring speed
of 1000 rounds min−1. After each 24 hour period, the reaction mixture
was cooled to room temperature and an aliquot was analyzed by 1H
NMR. Based on the SO integrated intensity in the NMR spectrum, addi-
tional substrate was added to the mixture to recover the initial substrate
to catalyst ratio. Carbon dioxide was bubbled through the solution for
15 min at room temperature, the CO2 reservoir was connected to the
reaction vessel, which was returned to the thermostatic bath. For the
catalytic tests run over a course of 24 h, yields were determined by 1H
NMR following the same procedure but starting with 5 mmol of styrene
oxide and 1 mol% of the catalysts (1a–c).
1
Note that the participation of the deprotonated AZAP species in the catalytic cycle has
been ruled out considering the high pKa value of the AZAP acid–base couple (pKa ~ 33)
and the absence of a strong base in the reaction medium.