C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 3
Scheme 4
to that of 3b (taking into account a different auxiliary ligand). For
example, the Pt-mesityl distance of 2.057(6) Å remained virtually
unchanged when compared with that in 3b. The long 4.028 Å distance
between the benzylic fluorine atom and platinum center suggests that
there is no interaction between the two atoms in the solid state.
While the mechanistic studies of the new fluorination reaction are
still underway, we believe that the formation of a transient Pt(IV)
difluoro species (similar to 4) takes place followed by the fluoride-
assisted metalation of one of the methyl groups of the mesityl ligand.17
The reaction is probably facilitated by high steric congestion around
the metal center. The benzylic C-F reductive elimination from a Pt(IV)
complex furnishes the final product (Scheme 4).
In summary, we demonstrated that Pt complexes can be used in
the electrophilic fluorination of a benzylic C-H bond. In addition,
using different electrophilic fluorinating reagents can lead to
different reaction outcomes, which can be important in the design
of new fluorination methods. Further studies on the reactivity of
Pt complexes in fluorination reactions are ongoing in our laboratory.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the US-Israel
Binational Science Foundation.
PPh3 to this species gave a 16-electron square-planar complex 5
which was isolated in a quantitative yield (Scheme 2). The 31P NMR
spectroscopy as well as X-ray structural analysis of 5 confirms the
trans-positioning of the two phosphine ligands in solution and the
solid state. As the reaction between TMS-OTf and 4 likely gives a
cationic monofluoro Pt(IV) intermediate,12 we thought that the
reaction of 3a with an electrophilic fluorinating reagent, such as
N-fluoro-2,4,6-trimethylpyridinium tetrafluoroborate (“N-F”+),
would directly result in the formation of 5, after the addition of
PPh3. Indeed, as shown in Scheme 2, complex 5 was obtained in
the sequence of reactions which likely involved electrophilic
fluorination, C-C reductive elimination, C-H activation, and H-F
elimination; however, the reaction was not as clean as the fluoride
removal from 4 with TMS-OTf giving ∼30% of unidentified
byproducts. Following the reaction by 19F NMR spectroscopy
revealed the formation of a new Pt monofluoride complex which
rapidly disappeared at RT to give the final product. This intermedi-
ate complex was assigned the structure of 6 (Scheme 2) based on
the 31P and 19F NMR data. Subsequent addition of 1.5 equiv of
Me4N+F- hydrate resulted in the formation of 4 as the major
product. While we did not observe 6 in the reaction between 4 and
TMS-OTf even at low temperatures, it is possible that the reaction
proceeds via a different, more reactive Pt(IV) isomer.13
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis and characterization of
complexes 2-9 (PDF). X-ray data for complexes 2, 3b, 4, 5, and 9 (CIF).
References
(1) (a) Grushin, V. V. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 160. (b) Vigalok, A.
Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 5102.
(2) (a) Adams, D. J.; Clark, J. H. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1999, 28, 225. (b) Sheppard,
T. D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 1043. (c) Chemistry of Organic Fluorine
Compounds II; Hudlicki, M., Pavlath, A. E., Eds.; American Chemical
Society: Washington, DC, 1995.
(3) (a) Watson, D. A.; Su, M.; Teverovskiy, G.; Zhang, Y.; Garc’´a-Fortanet,
J.; Kinzel, T.; Buchwald, S. L. Science 2009, 325, 1661. (b) Barthazy, P.;
Togni, A.; Mezzetti, A. Organometallics 2001, 20, 3472.
(4) (a) Kalyani, D.; Dick, A. R.; Anani, W. Q.; Sanford, M. S. Tetrahedron
2006, 62, 11483. (b) Hull, K. L.; Anani, W. Q.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7134. (c) Wang, X.; Mei, T.-S.; Yu, J.-Q. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7520.
(5) Ball, N. D.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3796.
(6) Furuya, T.; Ritter, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10060.
(7) Kaspi, A.; Yahav-Levi, A.; Goldberg, I.; Vigalok, A. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 5.
(8) (a) Yahav, A.; Goldberg, I.; Vigalok, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13634.
(b) Yahav, A.; Goldberg, I.; Vigalok, A. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 1547.
(9) Tewari, A.; Hein, M.; Zapf, A.; Beller, M. Synthesis 2004, 935.
(10) Calvet, T.; Crespo, M.; Font-Bardia, M.; Gomez, K.; Gonzalez, G.;
Martinez, M. Organometallics 2009, 28, 5096.
(11) The pyridine ligand was sometimes lost with the eliminated HF. To maintain the
16e configuration it was necessary to add more pyridine along with PPh3.
(12) Such cationic intermediates have been shown to be highly reactive in the
C-C reductive elimination from Pt(IV) complexes; for example, see:
Procelewska, J.; Zahl, A.; Liehr, G.; van Eldik, R.; Smythe, N. A.; Williams,
B. S.; Goldberg, K. I. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 7732.
(13) A nearly identical to 6 intermediate complex was also observed, along the
way to 5, when N-fluoro-2,4,6-trimethylpyridinium triflate was used,
suggesting that the anion has little role in the overall transformation.
(14) Several platinum(II) systems for C-F actiVation have been reported: (a)
Crespo, M.; Martinez, M.; Sales, J. Organometallics 1993, 12, 4291. (b)
Anderson, C. M.; Crespo, M.; Ferguson, G.; Lough, A. J.; Puddephatt,
R. J. Organometallics 1992, 11, 1177. (c) Wang, T.; Alfonso, B. J.; Love,
J. A. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5629. (d) Wang, T.; Love, J. A. Organometallics
2008, 27, 3290. (e) Amii, H.; Uneyama, K. Chem. ReV. 2009, 109, 2119.
(15) Under the same conditions, no benzylic fluorination of mesitylene with
XeF2 takes place in the absence of platinum.
Unexpectedly, while the reaction of 3b with the “N-F”+ salt
proceeded similarly to the reaction of 3a, giving the product of the
C-C coupling and consequent cyclometalation 7 as the major species,
treating 3b with XeF2 did not give the analogous to 4 difluoro Pt(IV)
product. Instead, quantitative fluorination of one of the ortho-benzylic
positions of the mesityl ligand was obtained in this case giving complex
8 (Scheme 3). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first fluorination
of a C-H bond assisted by a platinum complex14 and first fluorination
at the ortho-position not requiring a heteroatom directing group.15
While the 31P{1H} NMR spectrum of 8 shows a signal very similar to
that of 3b, the triplet at 197.2 ppm (JHF ) 50 Hz) in the 19F NMR
spectrum unambiguously confirms the fluorination in the benzylic
position. The CH2F group gives rise to two low-field doublets of
doublets in the 1H NMR spectrum due to the inequivalent hydrogen
atoms (Scheme 3, insert). Unlike 3b, complex 8 shows considerable
solubility in nonpolar solvents, such as pentane, and proved extremely
difficult to crystallize. Fortunately, the replacement of pyridine in 8
with PPh3 gave complex 9, which was crystallized16 from
CH2Cl2-MeOH. The X-ray structure of 9 (Scheme 4) confirms the
selective fluorination of one of the ortho-methyl groups of the mesityl
ligand, with the overall geometry of the complex being very similar
(16) The complex cocrystallized with an additional PPh3 molecule, which was
omitted from Scheme 3 for clarity.
(17) A Pt(IV)-Cl interaction with the ligand CH3 group without cyclometallation
was recently reported: Mamtora, J.; Crosby, S. H.; Newman, C. P.; Clarkson,
G. J.; Rourke, J. P. Organometallics 2008, 27, 5559.
JA101436W
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 31, 2010 10627