C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
result of crystal packing forces and is an indication of the
remarkable flexibility of the enediyne framework.
The reactions reported herein represent the first examples of
photochemical enediyne liberation from a metal as well as the
formation of a new class of enediynes, the cyclopentadienidoene-
diynes. We believe that photochemical dissociation of enediyne
ligands will prove to be general with respect to other types of
organometallic enediyne complexes (dienes, alkynes, etc.). Efforts
are underway to prepare photoactive strained-ring enediynes that
will spontaneously cycloaromatize upon enediyne dissociation from
the metal.
M06-2X/TZVP density functional theory (DFT) computational
studies were undertaken to elucidate the fundamental structural and
electronic differences between cyclopentadienidoenediynes and
benzoenediynes, as represented by the structures 6-OMe-calc and
7-calc (Figures 3 and 4, Table 1). The validity of the computational
results is supported by the remarkably close agreement between
the crystallographic and computational data for 6-OMe and anion
6-OMe-calc. The largest structural differences between 6-OMe and
6-OMe-calc are the 0.045 Å difference in the [cd] distance and the
conformation about the C10-C11 bond, for which the carbonyl
oxygen (O2) is oriented endo (pointing toward the other alkyne)
in the solid-state structure. The exo-exo gas-phase structure is
calculated to be the lowest-energy conformer by 0.5 kcal/mol. Both
structural differences are attributed to crystal lattice packing forces.
The C4-C8, C2-C3, and C9-C10 distances as well as the [cd]
distance are longer in cyclopentadienidoenediyne 6-OMe-calc than
in 7-calc, leading to the prediction of a significantly higher
activation energy for Bergman cycloaromatization in the former.
We have observed only decomposition to uncharacterized products
upon heating 6-OMe in THF at 150°. It is anticipated that
incorporation of the enediyne into a 10-membered ring (as in 4)
will lead to accelerated cycloaromatization rates in the metal-free
system relative to strained-ring benzoenediynes as a result of
significant strain-induced destabilization of the cyclopentadieni-
doenediyne ground-state structures. The ∆SCF (Koopmans’) theory
gas-phase ionization potentials for 6-OMe-calc and 7-calc are 3.70
(3.05) and 9.10 (8.37) eV, respectively.14 These can be compared
with the values of 2.03 (1.44) and 9.53 (8.41) eV for cyclopenta-
dienide and benzene, respectively. The dipole moments are 6.4 D
for 6-OMe-calc and 0.44 D for 7-calc. A perspective of the frontier
orbital energies (in eV) for 6-OMe-calc is shown in Figure 4.
Acknowledgment. Financial support by the National Science
Foundation (CHE-0518707, CHE-0911765, and instrumentation
grant CHE-9709183) is gratefully acknowledged. M.A. acknowl-
edges the award of a Kamen/Kaplan Fellowship. K.K.B. acknowl-
edges the Swiss National Science Foundation for support of this
work.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details for all new
compounds, computational details for 6-OMe-calc and 7-calc, and
crystallographic data for 5-Ph, 5-OMe, 5-Me, 6-Ph, and 6-OMe (CIF).
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
References
(1) (a) Perrin, C. L.; Rodgers, B. L.; O’Connor, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 4795. (b) Rawat, D. S.; Zaleski, J. M. Synlett 2004, 393. (c) Smith,
A. L.; Nicolaou, K. C. J. Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 2103.
(2) (a) Dosa, P. I.; Gu, Z.; Hager, D.; Karney, W. L.; Vollhardt, K. P. C. Chem.
Commun. 2009, 1967. (b) Wu, Y.-T.; Bandera, D.; Maag, R.; Linden, A.;
Baldridge, K. K.; Siegel, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10729. (c)
Hickenboth, C. R.; Rule, J. D.; Moore, J. S. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 8435.
(d) Spitler, E. L.; Johnson, C. A., II; Haley, M. M. Chem. ReV. 2006, 106,
5344. (e) Nielsen, M. B.; Diederich, F. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 1837.
(3) For example, in neat solutions, 1 (R ) CO2Et) polymerizes within minutes,
whereas 2 (R ) CO2Et) is thermally stable at ambient temperatures. See:
Ko¨nig, B.; Pitsch, W.; Klein, M.; Vasold, R.; Prall, M.; Schreiner, P. R. J.
Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1742.
(4) (a) Ornelas, C.; Me´ry, D.; Cloutet, E.; Aranzaes, J. R.; Astruc, D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1495. (b) Diallo, A. K.; Ruiz, J.; Astruc, D. Inorg.
Chem. 2010, 49, 1913. (c) Stepnicka, P. Ferrocenes: Ligands, Materials
and Biomolecules; Wiley: Chichester, England, 2008. (d) Barlow, S.;
Henling, L. M.; Day, M. W.; Schaefer, W. P.; Green, J. C.; Hascall, T.;
Marder, S. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6285.
(5) (a) Yamaguchi, Y.; Ding, W.; Sanderson, C. T.; Borden, M. L.; Morgan,
M. J.; Kutal, C. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2007, 251, 515. (b) Che, D. J.; Li, G.;
Du, B. S.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y. H. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1997, 261, 121. (c)
Nesmeyanov, A. N.; Sazonova, V. A.; Romanenko, V. I. Dokl. Akad. Nauk
SSSR 1963, 152, 1358.
(6) Bunz, U. H. F. J. Organomet. Chem. 1995, 494, C8.
(7) Baldridge, K. K.; Donovan-Merkert, B. T.; O’Connor, J. M.; Lee, L. I.;
Clossson, A.; Fandrick, D.; Tran, T.; Bunker, K. D.; Fouzi, M.; Gantzel,
P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 763.
Figure 3. DFT structures of (left) 7-calc and (right) 6-OMe-calc.
(8) Crystallographic details are provided in the Supporting Information.
(9) In the solid-state structure of CpFe(C5H4Ct CCOPh), the Fe · · ·C3 distance
is 3.067 Å, which is consistent with a larger contribution from a cumulene
resonance contributor than in the case of 5-Ph. See: Arellano, I.; Sharma,
P.; Arias, J. L.; Toscano, A.; Cabrera, A.; Rosas, N. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.
2007, 266, 294.
(10) Sunlight also induces the reactions of triphos with both 5-OMe and 5-Ph
to give nearly quantitative yields of 6-OMe and 6-Ph. In a control
experiment, it was found that there is no reaction in the absence of light.
(11) In the solid state, the anions in complexes 6 are well-separated from the
metal [unlike those in most cyclopentadienide complexes, such as
Na(TMEDA)C5H5] and thus represent rare examples of “η0”-cyclopenta-
dienido anion. See: Casey, C. P.; O’Connor, J. M.; Haller, K. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 1241, and references therein.
(12) Kosinski, C.; Hirsch, A.; Heinemann, F. W.; Hampel, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2001, 3879.
(13) A search of the Cambridge Structural Database indicated that the C9-
C10-C11 angle of 168° in 6-Ph is at the low end of the range for acyclic
alkynes.
(14) In chloroform solution, 6-OMe undergoes decomposition over the course
of days to give uncharacterized paramagnetic products.
Figure 4. Frontier orbitals for (left) 7-calc and (right) 6-OMe-calc [MP2/
DZ(2d,p) for 7-calc: -9.09, 0.87 eV; ∆ ) 9.96 eV. For 6-OMe-calc: -3.73,
5.29 eV; ∆ ) 9.02 eV.]
JA105149K
9
11032 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 32, 2010