direct alkynylation of azoles, providing an efficient new route
to diverse (hetero)aryl alkynes (Scheme 1).
Table 1. Optimization toward Direct Alkynylation of
As part of our program directed toward the development
of metal-catalyzed C-H bond functionalization, we found
that the copper/diphosphine duet enabled the direct alkyny-
lation of various azoles with 1-bromoalkynes.3j Furthermore,
we hypothesized that their direct precursors, the 1,1-bromo-
1-alkenes, could serve as a reaction partner in such a process.
Indeed, treatment of 5-phenyloxazole 1 with 1,1-dibromosty-
rene 2 in the presence of CuBr·SMe2 (15 mol %), DPEPhos
(15 mol %) as ligand, LiOt-Bu (4 equiv) as base in dioxane
at 120 °C (Table 1, entry 1) delivered the desired product
3a in 40% yield after 2 h but without complete conversion.
Following this encouraging preliminary result, a brief
optimization of the reaction conditions was performed. While
no improvement in yield was obtained even after prolonged
heating (Table 1, entry 2), an increase in the amount of LiOt-
Bu (from 4 equiv) gave a positive effect, giving 3a in 58%
yield (5 equiv) and 70% yield (6 equiv) with complete
conversion (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). Mixing organic and
inorganic bases was detrimental to the direct alkynylation
process returning starting material (Table 1, entries 5-7).
The catalyst loading could be decreased down to 5 mol %
without affecting the yield. However, at these low loadings,
a 2:1 ratio ligand to catalyst proved to be crucial to maintain
the highest yield (Table 1, entries 8-10). A brief examination
of ligand structure showed no striking effect when XantPhos
and BINAP were used (Table 1, entries 11 and 12). Thus,
the optimum conditions were shown to be CuBr·SMe2 (5
mol %), DPEPhos (10 mol %), and LiOt-Bu (6 equiv) in
dioxane at 120 °C.
5-Phenyloxazolea
CuBr·SMe2
(mol %)
DPEPhos
(mol %)
LiOtBu
(equiv)
entry
yield (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
10
5
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
10
5
4
4
5
6
40
48c
58
70
0
2 + 2 DBU
2 + 3 Cs2CO3
2 + 3 Li2CO3
tracesd
tracesd
71
6
6
6
6
6
9
58
10
11
12
5
5
5
10
10
10
69
69e
50f
a All reactions were performed at 0.35 M of 5-phenyloxazole 1a (1
equiv), 2,2-dibromovinylbenzene 2a (2 equiv), CuBr·SMe2 (15 mol %),
DPEPhos (15 mol %), LiOt-Bu in dioxane heated at 120 °C for 2 h.
b Isolated yields. c The reaction was run overnight. d 2,2-Dibromovinylbenzene
(1.5 equiv) was used, and the reaction was run for 24 h. e XantPhos was
used as ligand. f BINAP was used as ligand.
readily accessible 1,1-dibromo-1-alkenes (Scheme 2). These
building blocks are commonly prepared from the corre-
sponding commercially available aldehydes via the Ramirez
procedure.8 Both electron-rich (Scheme 2: 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d,
3e, 3f) and electron-deficient (Scheme 2: 3g, 3h, 3i) gem-
dibromoolefins reacted regioselectively at the C-2 position
of 5-phenyloxazole 1a in good yields, with substitution being
tolerated at each of the ortho, meta, and para positions.
Importantly, these conditions proved to be compatible with
the presence of important functional groups on the aromatic
moiety such as halides (63-65%), nitro (44%), and cyano
(48%). It is noteworthy that the acetal group survives these
reaction conditions, providing the expected compound 3m
in a satisfactory 55% yield. In addition to the aryl group,
the reaction also proceeds equally well with different gem-
dibromoolefins including heteroaryl- and alkenyl-substituted
alkenes (Scheme 2: 3j, 3k, 3l). Unfortunately, these condi-
tions were not found to be applicable to related 1,1-
dibromoalkenes bearing a simple alkyl substituent. The
apparent lack of reactivity for this substrate is still unclear
at this stage, and investigations to overcome this issue are
ongoing.
This optimized protocol was subsequently applied to the
direct alkynylation of 5-phenyloxazole 1a with various
(3) (a) Kalinin, V. K.; Pashchenko, D. N.; She, F. MendeleeV Commun.
1992, 2, 60. (b) Kobayashi, K.; Arisawa, M.; Yamaguchi, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 8528. (c) Trofimov, B. A.; Stepanova, Z. V.; Sobenina,
L. N.; Mikhaleva, A. I.; Ushakov, I. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 6513.
(d) Amemiya, R.; Fujii, A.; Yamaguchi, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45,
4333. (e) Seregin, I. V.; Ryabova, V.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 124, 8528. (f) Gu, Y.; Wang, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 763.
(g) Tobisu, M.; Ano, Y.; Chatani, N. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3250. (h) For a
single example of palladium-catalyzed direct alkynylation of sidnones (34%
yield), see: Rodriguez, A.; Fennessy, R.; Moran, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009,
50, 3942. (i) Matsuyama, N.; Hirano, K.; Satoh, T.; Miura, M. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 4156. (j) Besselie`vre, F.; Piguel, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 9953. (k) Brand, J. P.; Charpentier, J.; Waser, J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 9346. (l) Dudnik, A. S.; Gevorgyan, V. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2010, 49, 2096. (m) Kawano, T.; Matsuyama, N.; Hirano, K.; Satoh,
T.; Miura, M. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 1764. (n) Kim, S. H.; Chang, S.
Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1868.
(4) Selected examples: (a) Shen, W.; Thomas, S. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2,
2857, and references cited therein. (b) Lera, M.; Hayes, C. J. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 3873. (c) Chelucci, G.; Capitta, F.; Baldino, S. Tetrahedron 2008,
64, 10250. (d) Rao, M. L. N.; Jadhav, D. N.; Dasgupta, P. Org. Lett. 2010,
12, 2048.
(5) Wang, J.-R.; Manabe, K. Synthesis 2009, 9, 1405, and references
cited therein.
Next, the reaction scope was also investigated with respect
to the heterocycles. The C-2 position of oxazoles bearing
electronically different aryl/styryl groups at C-5 was alky-
nylated to furnish 4, 5 and 6 in 61%, 75% and 53% yields
respectively (Scheme 3). Moreover, the electron-donating
dimethylamino group was tolerant of the reaction conditions
(6) (a) Bryan, C. S.; Lautens, M. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2754, and
references cited therein. (b) Arthuis, M.; Pontikis, R.; Florent, J.-C. Org.
Lett. 2009, 11, 4608. (c) Vieira, T. O.; Meaney, L. A.; Shi, Y.-L.; Alper,
H. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4899. (d) Thielges, S.; Meddah, E.; Bisseret, P.;
Eustache, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 907. (e) Wang, L.; Shen, W.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7625.
(7) (a) Newman, S. G.; Aureggi, V.; Bryan, C. S.; Lautens, M. Chem.
Commun. 2009, 5236. (b) Coste, A.; Karthikeyan, G.; Couty, F.; Evano,
G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4381. (c) Coste, A.; Couty, F.; Evano,
G. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4454. (d) Yuen, J.; Fang, Y.-Q.; Lautens, M. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 653.
(8) Ramirez, F.; Desai, N. B.; Mc Kelvie, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962,
84, 1745.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 18, 2010
4039