Z.-H. Huang, et al.
Bioorganic&MedicinalChemistryLettersxxx(xxxx)xxxx
Table 2
Anti-inflammatory effects of compounds 2a–2x.
Anti-inflammatory effects
Ear edema SEM (mg)
Compounds
R
Inhibition rate (%)
2a
2-F
1.85
3.03
1.15
3.37
2.64
4.57
1.43
1.84
5.25
4.43
2.67
2.55
3.42
2.09
2.86
3.24
3.81
3.73
2.50
3.28
3.39
2.98
2.28
5.62
4.81
9.84
0.92***
81.2
69.2
88.3
65.8
73.2
53.6
85.5
81.3
46.7
55.0
72.9
74.1
65.2
78.8
70.9
67.1
61.3
62.1
74.6
66.7
65.5
69.7
76.8
42.9
51.1
–
2b
3-F
0.71**
2c
4-F
0.68***
1.12**
0.42**
1.10*
2d
2,4-F2
2-Cl
2e
2f
3-Cl
2g
4-Cl
0.43***
0.94***
0.96*
2h
2,4-Cl2
2,6-Cl2
2-Br
2i
2j
1.21*
2k
3-Br
0.68**
0.67***
0.41**
0.43***
0.59**
1.42**
0.58**
0.95**
0.47***
1.01**
1.11**
1.14**
0.79***
1.13*
2l
4-Br
Fig. 3. Percent decrease in the duration of immobility for compounds 2a–2x.
2m
3-OH
(Notes: flu: fluoxetine).
2n
4-OH
2o
2-CH3
3-CH3
4-CH3
2-OCH3
3-OCH3
4-OCH3
3-OH-4-OCH3
4-N(CH3)2
4-CH(CH3)2
4-NO2
3 mg/kg
–
2p
2k = 13.8
9.4; 2w = 22.8
2.9; fluoxetine = 88.1
9.9).
2q
Structure–activity relationship studies of derivatives 2a–2x (Table 1
and Fig. 3) revealed that substitution with either electron donor groups
or electron acceptor groups on the benzene ring gave compounds that
were able reduce the immobility time of the animals and elicit anti-
depressant effects. Second, regarding the introduction of an electron
donor group substituent [–OH, –CH3, –OCH3, 3-OH-4-OCH3, –N(CH3)2,
and –CH(CH3)2], the data clearly indicated that the 11 compounds were
2r
2s
2t
2u
2v
2w
2x
indomethacin
control
0.96*
1.73
active in the order: 4-CH(CH3)2
>
3-OH
>
4-N(CH3)2
4-OH
>
>
3-
4-
a
OCH3 3-OH-4-OCH3 3-CH3
>
>
>
4-CH3 >
Percent anti-inflammatory activity versus control at 60 min. * P < 0.05,
** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 compared with the control group.
OCH3 > 2-CH3 > 2-OCH3. Compounds 2m, 2p, and 2s had sub-
stitution at the 3-position of the benzene ring, and exhibited excellent
anti-depressant activities. Comparing 2m and 2n, which featured –OH
substitutions in different places on the benzene ring, the order of ac-
potent anti-inflammatory activities (Table 2). The trend in activity was
4-F > 2-F > 3-F > 2,4-F2 for F-substituted positions; the sequence of
effect was 4-Cl > 2,4-Cl2 > 2-Cl > 3-Cl > 2,6-Cl2 for Cl-substituted
positions; the order of activity was4-Br > 3-Br > 2-Br for Br-sub-
stituted positions. We found that compounds that contained a halogen
atom at the 4-positionon the phenyl ring (2c, 2g, and 2l) showed good
anti-inflammatory effects. Compound 2x (with a strong electron with-
drawing –NO2 group) exhibited a potent anti-inflammatory effect.
Compounds 2m–2w with electron donating substituents also displayed
anti-inflammatory activity compared with the control group (p < 0.01
or p < 0.001), the order of activity was 4-OH > 4-CH(CH3)2 > 3-
tivity was 3-OH
> 4-OH, and the order of activity for the
-CH3substituted analogs 2o, 2p, and 2q was 3-CH3 > 4-CH3 > 2-CH3.
The order of activity for the –OCH3 substituted compounds 2r, 2s, and
2t was 3-OCH3
> 4-OCH3 > 2-OCH3. Third, concerning the 12
compounds with the electron withdrawing substitutions, F (2a, 2b, 2c,
and 2d), Cl (2e, 2f, 2g, 2h, and 2i), and Br (2j, 2k, and 2l), the location
of the halogen atom on the benzene ring affected the anti-depressant
activity. Comparing 2a, 2b, 2c, and 2d, which featured F substitutions
at different positions, the order of activity was 4-F
> 3-F > 2-
F > 2,4-F2. The order of activity for the Cl-substituted compounds 2e,
2f, 2g, 2h, and 2i was 4-Cl > 2,4-Cl2 > 3-Cl > 2,6-Cl2 > 2-Cl. The
order of activity for the Br-substituted derivatives 2j, 2k, and 2l was 3-
OCH3
> 2-CH3 > 4-N(CH3)2 > 3-CH3 > 4-OCH3 > 3-OH-4-
OCH3 > 3-OH > 2-OCH3 > 4-CH3.Compounds 2n and 2w exhibited
the highest anti-inflammatory activity with 78.8% and 76.8% reduction
in ear edema, respectively. The anti-inflammatory effects of 2n and 2w
were greater than that of indomethacin (51.1%).
Br
> 2-Br > 4-Br. Finally, compound 2x (featuring an electron
withdrawing –NO2 group) also exhibited anti-depressant activity as
indicated by a 72.8% decrease in the immobility time.
The analgesic effects of compounds 2a–2x and the reference drug
indomethacin were assessed by the acetic acid-induced abdominal
writhing test. All compounds, when administered intraperitoneally at
3 mg/kg, displayed potential analgesic effects with inhibition rates
from 62.3% to 76.4% (Fig. 4). Among them, compounds 2c, 2i, 2m, and
2q displayed the best analgesic effects with inhibition rates of 76.30,
75.26, 76.41, and 76.32%, respectively, which were similar to that of
indomethacin (78.3%). We found that variation in the substituents on
the phenyl group affected activity. An electron donating group was
better for activity than an electron withdrawing group, and regarding
the introduction of the 11donor groups, the sequence of activity was
2q > 2m > 2w > 2v > 2t > 2p > 2n > 2s > 2r > 2u > 2o.
Different locations of the halogen atom on the phenyl ring also affected
the analgesic activity. The trend in activity was 4-F > 2-F > 3-
F > 2,4-F2 for F-substituted positions; 2,6-Cl2 > 2,4-Cl2 > 2-Cl >
3-Cl > 4-Cl for Cl-substituted positions; and 4-Br > 2-Br > 3-Br for
Cl-substituted positions. Researchers have described the anti-in-
flammatory and analgesic activities of anti-depressant drugs,27,28 and
from our results it can be suggested the compounds in our study have a
Anti-depressants can be regarded as anti-inflammatory and an-
because they possess inherent anti-nociceptive effects.25,26 To explore
possible mechanisms of action, we also evaluated the anti-inflammatory
and analgesic effects of derivatives 2a–2x and indomethacin (as a re-
ference drug) using the dimethylbenzene-induced ear edema mouse
model, the results of which are displayed in Table 2.The anti-in-
that of indomethacin (3 mg/kg). All compounds displayed anti-in-
flammatory effects when intraperitoneally injected before administra-
tion of the inflammatory compound dimethylbenzene, with ear in-
flammation values ranging from 1.15
0.68 to 5.62
1.13 mg, and
inhibition rates of inflammation from 42.9% to 88.3%. Seven com-
pounds, namely 2c, 2g 2h, 2l, 2n, 2s, and 2w, exhibited anti-in-
flammatory activities with inhibition rates of 88.3%, 85.5%, 81.3%,
74.1%, 78.8%, 74.6%, and 76.8%, respectively, which were more ac-
tive than indomethacin (51.1%).
Furthermore, derivatives 2a–2l with F, Cl, and Br groups displayed
3