4498
D. Nhu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 4496–4498
Compounds 6 and 7 are suggestive of very sharp SAR, as exten-
group was better tolerated on the benzyl ring, and compound 16
returned an EC50 of 5 M although it was also reasonably cytotoxic
with an EC50 of 21 M.
sion of the benzyl group by one methylene or incorporation of a
branched carbon, respectively appears to largely destroy activity.
Keeping the N-benzyl group constant, variations in the left hand side
were then investigated. Replacement of the N-phenyl group with an
N-methyl group (compound 8) led to a loss of activity and the simi-
larly poor activity of N-butyl compound 9 indicated that hydropho-
bicity of the substituent alone was insufficient to restore activity.
Remarkably, even the des-chloro N-phenyl compound 10 was com-
pletely inactive, suggesting very sharp negative SAR and that a
chloro in the 4-position was vital for good activity.
One way of improving solubility and permeability and hence
drug-likeness is through decreasing crystallinity and this can often
be achieved with N-alkylation. Hence we made and tested the
N-methyl compound 11 and showed that such modification was
well tolerated with activity being similar to that of 1. However,
cytotoxicity to mammalian cells was significant with an EC50 of
l
l
Also shown in parentheses in Table 2 for compounds 1, 6, 11, 13,
15 and 16 are the biological activities against the chloroquine-
resistant Dd2 strain of P. falciparum. It can be seen that these com-
pounds are essentially equipotent towards this strain, suggesting
that their mode of activity is independent to that of chloroquine.
In summary, we report novel heterocycles based on 3-(4-chlor-
ophenylamino-6-(benzylamino)-1,2,4,5-tetrazines that are active
against P. falciparum. SAR was probed and revealed both the 4-
chloroaniline and benzylamino substituents were essential for
activity. However, the aniline nitrogen atom could be methylated
(11) and a solubilizing group installed on the benzyl ring (16) with
maintenance of reasonable potency in the low micromolar range.
We recommend caution in progressing this class of compounds be-
cause they have a tendency to be toxic towards mammalian cells
and it currently cannot be ruled out that this may be linked to their
observed antimalarial activity.
12 lM. Solubility can be increased further by installation of a sol-
ubilizing group and in this regard we targeted tertiary amines as
they can be membrane permeable and have been shown to im-
prove activity in other antimalarial compounds through accumula-
tion in the acidic food vacuole of the parasite.16
Acknowledgments
To this end we made and tested amine 13, but it exhibited
weaker activity suggesting that while the N-methyl group in 11
was acceptable, further elongation of the N-alkyl group was not.
In order to explore other positions that may not interfere, we made
two compounds where the tertiary amine was attached via a tether
to the meta position of either the aniline ring or the benzyl ring. It
was envisaged that by being on the meta position, there would be
the maximum topographical space in which to move to either lo-
cate a favorable interaction or avoid an unfavorable interaction.
Where this group was on the aniline ring, activity was weaker
Financial support was received from the Victorian State Govern-
ment OISS Grant and NHRMC IRIISS Grant #361646 and for this we
are grateful.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
and compound 15 exhibited an EC50 of 15 lM. In contrast, this
1. Snow, R. W.; Guerra, C. A.; Noor, A. M.; Myint, H. Y.; Hay, S. I. Nature 2005, 434,
214.
Table 2
Biological data for tetrazines
2. Gallup, J. L.; Sachs, J. D. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2001, 64, 85.
3. Haldar, K.; Milner, D. A.; Murphy, S. C., Jr.; Taylor, T. E. Annu. Rev. Pathol.: Mech.
Dis. 2007, 2, 217.
Compd R1
R2
R3
EC50
(l
M)a
4. Greenwood, B. M.; Bojang, K.; Whitty, C. J. M.; Targett, G. A. T. Lancet 2005, 365,
1487.
5. Frederich, M.; Dogne, J.-M.; Angenot, L.; Mol, P. D. Curr. Med. Chem. 2002, 9,
1435.
6. Miller, L. H.; Baruch, D. I.; Marsh, K.; Doumbo, O. K. Nature 2002, 415, 673.
7. Good, M. F. Trends Parasitol. 2005, 21, 29.
Pfb
Cytotoxc
1
6
7
4-ClPh
CH2Ph
—
—
—
1.1
58%@
(1.1)d
29
NA@
M) 115
NA@38 lM
lM
4-ClPh
4-ClPh
CH2CH2-
Ph
CH(Me)-
Ph
CH2Ph
CH2Ph
CH2Ph
CH2Ph
85% @115
(88%@115
NA@38
l
l
M
M
l
M
8. Brady, R. L.; Cameon, A. Curr. Drug Target 2004, 5, 137.
9. D’Alessandro, U. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2009, 10, 1291.
10. Hisaeda, H.; Yasutomo, K.; Himeno, K. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005, 37, 700.
11. Cosledan, F.; Fraisse, L.; Pellet, A.; Guillou, F.; Mordmuller, B.; Kremsner, P. G.;
Moreno, A.; Mazier, D.; Maffrand, J.-P.; Meunier, B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2008, 105, 17579.
12. Crespo, M. D. P.; Avery, T. D.; Hassen, E.; Fox, E.; Robinson, T. V.; Valente, P.;
Taylor, D. K.; Tilley, L. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 98.
13. This was undertaken at the Swiss Tropical Research Institute. Compounds 1
and 2 belonged to primary screening hit sets derived from screening our high
throughput screening library against Trypanosoma brucei-derived farnesyl
pyrophosphate synthase (FPPS) and Trypanosoma cruzi-derived trypanothione
reductase, respectively. The potent and selective antimalarial activity of
compounds 1 and 2 was therefore serendipitous and may have arisen via
mechanisms unrelated to the enzyme targets for the initial screen. We have
recently disclosed the results of the trypanothione reductase high throughput
screen (Ref. 17).
l
8
Me
n-Bu
Ph
—
—
—
Me
NA@115
NA@115
NA@115
2.4
l
l
l
M
M
M
NA@115
NA@115
NA@115
12
l
l
l
M
M
M
9e
10
11
4-ClPh
(3.5)d
12
13
4-ClPh
4-ClPh
CH2Ph
CH2Ph
Me
NTf
NTf
38
CH2CH2- 13
NMe2
(20)d
14
15
4-ClPh
CH2Ph
CH2Ph
CH2CH2- NA@115
NMe2
l
M
NA@115
52%@38
lM
3-
—
—
15
lM
(Me2N-
CH2CH2-
O)Ph
(13)d
14. Werbel, L. M.; McNamara, D. J.; Colbry, N. L.; Johnson, J. L.; Degnan, M. J.;
Whitney, B. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1979, 16, 881.
15. Rusinov, G. L.; Latosh, N. I.; Ganebnykh, I. I.; Ishmetova, R. I.; Ignatenko, N. K.;
Chupakhin, O. N. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 42, 757.
16
4-ClPh
CH2Ph(3-
O CH2CH2-
NMe2)
5g
21
(6)d
16. Kelly, J. X.; Smilkstein, M. J.; Brun, R.; Wittlin, S.; Cooper, R. A.; Lane, K. D.;
Janowsky, A.; Johnson, R. A.; Dodean, R. A.; Winter, R.; Hinrichs, D. J.; Riscoe, M.
K. Nature 2009, 459, 270.
17. (a) Holloway, G. A.; Baell, J. B.; Fairlamb, A. H.; Novello, P. M.; Parisot, J. P.;
Richardson, J.; Watson, K. G.; Street, I. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 1422;
(b) Holloway, G. A.; Charman, W. N.; Fairlamb, A. H.; Brun, R.; Kaiser, M.;
Kostewicz, E.; Novello, P. M.; Parisot, J. P.; Richardson, J.; Street, I. P.; Watson, K.
G.; Baell, J. B. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 2824.
a
Values are means of two experiments, 50%.
Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 strain, erythrocytic stage, chloroquine was used as a
b
control, EC50 4 nM.
c
HEK, puromycin was used as a control, EC50 411 nM.
Plasmodium falciparum Dd2 strain (chloroquine-resistant), erythrocytic stage,
d
chloroquine was used as a control, EC50 173 nM.
e
Tested as a 1:1 mixture with inseparable 3,6-bis(n-butyl) by-product.
Not tested.
Approximate: poorly fitting curve.
f
g