May 2012
Synthesis, Characterization, and Biological Evaluation of 10H-Phenothiazines,
Their Sulfones and Ribofuranosides
715
C3 -H), 4.35 (m,1H, C4 -H), 4.90 (CH2 proton); 13C-NMR: d
164.1 (C-1), 130.2 (C-2), 155.2 (C-3), 120.8 (C-4), 139.0 (C-6),
128.8 (C-7), 139.5 (C-8), 120.0 (C-9), 95.6 (C-1’), 90.0 (C-2’),
91.2 (C-3’), 96.2 (C-4’), 80 (CH2); ms: m/z 784 (M+), 783 (31),
715 (55), 619 (100) etc. Anal. Calcd. For C41H31N2O9F3S: C,
62.75; H, 3.95; N, 3.57. Found: C, 62.67; H, 3.92; N, 3.61.
N-(20,30,50-tri-O-benzoyl)-b-D-ribofuranosyl-3-carboxy-7,8,9-
trifluoro-1-nitro-10H-phenothiazine (7d). This compound was
obtained as blackish crystals, mp 105ꢂC; yield 45%; IR: NO2
taken at 30ꢂC at intervals of exactly 1–6 min later. All
determinations were carried out in triplicate (Table 2 and Fig. 1).
Antimicrobial activity. The synthesized compounds were
tested for their antibacterial activity by using Paper Disc method
[17] by measuring the zone of inhibition on agar plates with
Enterobacter, Coagulase positive Staphylococci, and Coagulase
negative staphylococci as test organisms at concentration of
100 mg per disc using vancomycin and gatifloxacin as standard
compounds and antifungal activity against Candida albicans at
concentration of 100 mg/disc using flucanazole as standard
compound (Table 3).
0
0
1580, 1400, CF 1235, COC 1185 cmꢀ1; H-NMR: d 8.25–6.90
(m,18H, ArH), 11.6 (s, 1H, COOH), 6.42 (d,1H, C1 -H), 5.98
1
0
0
0
0
(m,1H, C2 -H), 5.80 (m,1H, C3 -H), 4.40 (m,1H, C4 -H), 4.92
(CH2 proton); 13C-NMR: d 150.1( C-1), 124.2(C-2), 148.1 (C-3),
125.2 (C-4), 112.0 (C-6),150.2 (C-7), 136.1 (C-8), 151.5 (C-9),
95.0 (C-1’), 85.2 (C-2’), 94.1 (C-3’), 98.1 (C-4’), 75 (CH2); ms:
m/z 786 (M+), 769 (100), 756 (60), 740 (50), 739 (48) etc. Anal.
Calcd. For C39H25N2O11F3S: C, 59.54; H, 3.18; N, 3.56. Found:
C, 59.74; H, 3.20; N, 3.48.
Antioxidant activity. All the synthesized compounds were
screened for their antioxidant activity by 1,1-diphenyl-2-
picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging assay and 2,2-
azinobis(3-ethyl benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) ABTS•+ radical
cation decolorization assay.
Acknowledgment. The authors thank Department of Chemistry,
University of Rajasthan, Jaipur for providing necessary facilities,
CDRI, Lucknow for mass spectral analysis, S.M.S. Medical
College, Jaipur, for antimicrobial activity, and Department of
Zoology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, for antioxidant
activity of synthesized compounds. UGC Research Award
Scheme is duly acknowledged for financial assistance.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
DPPH radical scavenging assay. Radical scavenging activity of
synthesized compounds against stable 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl
(DPPH) radical was determined spectrophotometrically as described
by Cuendet et al. [15]. A stock solution containing 1 mg/mL of the
compound was prepared in methanol. Fifty microlitres of the solution
were added to 5 mL of a 0.004% methanol solution of DPPH. After
30 min of incubation in the dark at room temperature, the absorbance
was read against a blank at 517 nm.
[1] Bodea, C.; Faroasan, V.; Panea, T. Rev Roum de Chim 1966,
11, 239.
[2] Ohkawa, H.; Ohishi, N.; Yogi, K. Anal Biochem 1979, 95, 351.
[3] Clercq, E. D. Nucleosides Nucleotides 1985, 4, 3.
[4] Gupta, R. R., Ed. Phenothiazines and 1,4-Benzothiazines
Chemical and Biomedical Aspects; Elsevier: Amsterdom, 1988,
pp160–210.
[5] Bauer, A. W.; Kibby, W. M. M.; Sherries, J. C.; Truck, M. Am
J Clin Path 1996, 45, 493.
[6] Gautam, N.; Gupta, R.; Gautam, D. C.; Gupta, R. R. Hetero-
cycl Commun 2000, 6, 369.
The assay was carried out in triplicate and the percentage of in-
hibition (Table 1) was calculated using the following formula.
[7] Singh, G.; Kumar, N.; Yadav, A. K. Heteroatom Chem 2003,
14, 481.
[8] Kachee, T. L.; Gupta, V.; Gautam, D. C.; Gupta, R. R. Phos-
phorus Sulfur Silicon 2005, 180, 2225.
ðAB ꢀ AAÞ
% Inhibition ¼
ꢄ 100
AB
[9] Rathore, B. S.; Kumar, M. Bioorg Med Chem 2006, 14, 5678.
[10] Gautam, V.; Sharma, M.; Samarth, R. M.; Gautam, N.; Kumar,
A.; Sharma, I. K.; Gautam, D. C. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon 2007, 182,
1381.
[11] Dixit, R.; Dixit, Y.; Gautam, D. C.; Gautam, N. Phosphorus
Sulfur Silicon 2008, 183, 1.
[12] Dixit, R.; Gautam, N.; Gautam, D. C. Jordan J Chem 2008, 3,
367.
[13] Sharma, P. R.; Gautam, D. C.; Gupta, V.; Gupta, R. R. Hetero-
cycl Commun 2002, 8, 195.
[14] Samarth, R. M.; Panwar, M.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, A. Mutagen-
esis 2006, 21, 61.
[15] Cuendet, M.; Hostettmann, K.; Potterat, O. Hel Chem Acta
1997, 80, 1144.
[16] Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.;
Rice-Evans, C. Free Radical Biol Med 1999, 26, 1231.
[17] Gould, J. C.; Browie, J. H. Edinb Med J 1950, 59, 178.
where AB = Absorption of blank, AA = Absorption of test.
ABTS radical cation decolorization assay.
The 2,2-
azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) radical cation
(ABTS) decolorization test was also used to assess the
antioxidant activity of synthesized compounds. The ABTS•+
assay was carried out using the improved assay of Re et al.
[16]. In short, ABTS•+ was generated by oxidation of ABTS
with potassium persulphate. For this purpose, ABTS was
dissolved in deionized water at a concentration of 7 mM, and
potassium persulphate added to a concentration of 2.45 mM.
The reaction mixture was left at room temperature overnight
(12–16 h) in the dark before use; the ABTS solution then was
diluted with ethanol to an absorbance of 0.700 ꢃ 0.020 at
734 nm. After addition of 1 mL of the diluted ABTS solution to
10 mL of compound and mixing, absorbance readings were
Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry
DOI 10.1002/jhet