RESEARCH FRONT
New Syntheses and Ring Expansion Reactions of Cyclobutenimines
1663
the mechanistic details outlined above. Evidence for the sug-
gested structure of 55 comes from its 1H NMR spectrum
showing the cyclopentyl methine hydrogen at d 5.53 and from
NOE experiments where irradiation of the cyclopentyl methine
resonance caused a 7% enhancement of the absorption of the
methine hydrogen of the isopropoxy group at d 4.29. Likewise,
irradiation of the absorption at d 4.29 caused a 10% enhance-
ment of the cyclopentyl hydrogen absorption at d 5.53.[42]
A prerequisite for the formation of products 45 and 55 is
the presence of an unsubstituted o-position in the N-phenyl
substituent. Therefore, a methyl group in this position should
prevent ring closure on the N-aryl group. This was, in fact,
observed. Specifically, thermolysis of the N-mesityl derivative
56 in refluxing xylene gave the cyclopentene 57 in 53% isolated
yield (Scheme 20). The formation of 57 is assumed to arise via
hydrogen abstraction from the proximal hydroxy group in a
diradical intermediate analogous to 43. The structure 57 was
proven by a single-crystal X-ray investigation.[42] It should be
noted that the observed E configuration of the exocyclic C¼C
unit in 57 speaks against an intramolecular hydrogen transfer
from the hydroxy group in 43.
[11] M. Mu¨ller, M. J. Heileman, H. W. Moore, E. Schaumann, G. Adiwidjaja,
Synthesis 1997, 50. doi:10.1055/S-1997-1496
[12] W. Regenhardt, E. Schaumann, H. W. Moore, Synthesis 2001, 1076.
doi:10.1055/S-2001-14559
[13] K. Benda, W. Regenhardt, E. Schaumann, G. Adiwidjaja, Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 1016. doi:10.1002/EJOC.200801101
[14] E. Schaumann, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1986, 95, 995. doi:10.1002/
BSCB.19860951106
[15] E. Schaumann, Perspectives in the Organic Chemistry of Sulfur 1987,
p. 251 (Eds B. Zwanenburg, A. J. H. Klunder) (Elsevier: Amsterdam).
[16] E. Schaumann, S. Winter-Extra, G. Ru¨hter, J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
4200. doi:10.1021/JO00300A045
[17] W. Ried, P. Schomann, Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1968, 714, 140.
doi:10.1002/JLAC.19687140114
[18] (a) W. Ried, A. H. Schmidt, Angew. Chem. 1972, 84, 1048.
doi:10.1002/ANIE.197209971
(b) W. Ried, A. H. Schmidt, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1972, 11,
997. doi:10.1002/ANIE.197209971
[19] H. Knorr, W. Ried, Synthesis 1978, 649. doi:10.1055/S-1978-24841
[20] (a) W. Ried, W. Kunstmann, Angew. Chem. 1968, 80, 121.
doi:10.1002/ANIE.196801351
(b) W. Ried, W. Kunstmann, Angew. Int. Ed. Engl. 1968, 7, 135.
doi:10.1002/ANIE.196801351
[21] W. Ried, W. Kunstmann, Chem. Ber. 1969, 102, 1422. doi:10.1002/
CBER.19691020438
Conclusions
[22] G. Oppermann, Ph.D. Thesis: Zur Chemie von exo-Methylen-oder
Stickstoff-modifizierten Cyclobutendionen, Clausthal 2007.
[23] W. Ried, W. Kunkel, G. Isenbruck, Chem. Ber. 1969, 102, 2688.
doi:10.1002/CBER.19691020825
[24] G. Seitz, P. Imming, Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 1227. doi:10.1021/
CR00014A004
[25] (a) L. Ghosez, B. Haveaux, H. G. Viehe, Angew. Chem. 1969, 81, 468.
doi:10.1002/ANIE.196904541
(b) L. Ghosez, B. Haveaux, H. G. Viehe, Angew. Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8,
454. doi:10.1002/ANIE.196904541
[26] (a) H. G. Viehe, Angew. Chem. 1967, 79, 744. doi:10.1002/ANIE.
196707671
Three routes to 4-iminocyclobutenones 21 were developed. In
all cases, lithium organyls bearing unsaturated organic residues
undergo selective 1,2-addition to the enone carbonyl group as
opposed to the imine group. This provides compounds for a
broad-based study of the thermolyses of substituted imino-
cyclobutenes. These reactions show similarity to those of the
analogous cyclobutenones. That is, they are initiated by
4p-electrocyclic ring opening, followed by 6p-electrocyclic
ring closure to give aminophenols or aminonaphthols. It was
demonstrated that the products show reversed regiochemistry
as compared with the corresponding carbonyl-derived products.
Thus, the imino group in iminocyclobutenones can be viewed
as a protective group for the more reactive carbonyl group in
alkoxy-substituted cyclobutendiones.
(b) H. G. Viehe, Angew. Int. Ed. Engl. 1967, 6, 767. doi:10.1002/ANIE.
196707671
[27] B. Singer, G. Maas, Chem. Ber. 1987, 120, 485. doi:10.1002/CBER.
19871200407
[28] N. Obata, T. Takizawa, Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 2231. doi:10.1016/
S0040-4039(01)98196-1
[29] N. Obata, T. Takizawa, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1977, 50, 2017.
doi:10.1246/BCSJ.50.2017
[30] J. S. Chickos, J. Org. Chem. 1973, 38, 3642. doi:10.1021/
JO00960A051
[31] D. Moderhack, Synthesis 1985, 1083. doi:10.1055/S-1985-31437
[32] T. Eicher, U. Stapperfenne, Synthesis 1987, 619. doi:10.1055/S-1987-
28024
A mechanistically more complex reaction was observed for
4-alkynyl derivatives 41. Here a diradical intermediate is
proposed which undergoes ring closure involving the N-aryl
group to ultimately give cyclopenta[b]quinolines as the primary
products. Although the yields of these products have yet to be
optimized, the unusual structures give evidence of the versatility
of cyclobutenimine chemistry.
References
[33] G. Verniest, J. Colpaert, K. W. To¨rnroos, N. De Kimpe, J. Org. Chem.
[1] S. P. Marsden, Sci. Synth. 2005, 26, 1045.
2005, 70, 4549. doi:10.1021/JO0502044
[2] (a) H. W. Moore, B. R. Yerxa, Chemtracts 1992, 5, 273.
(b) H. W. Moore, B. R. Yerxa, Adv. Strain Org. Chem. 1995, 4, 81.
[3] L. Danheiser, G. B. Dudley, W. F. Austin, Sci. Synth. 2006, 23, 493.
[4] L. S. Liebeskind, Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 3053. doi:10.1016/S0040-
4020(01)80131-9
[5] S. J. Collier, S. K. Singh, Sci. Synth. 2009, 45a, 49.
[6] (a) D. Bellusˇ, B. Ernst, Angew. Chem. 1988, 100, 820.
(b) D. Bellusˇ, B. Ernst, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1988, 27, 797.
[7] A. Mukkanti, M. Periasamy, Arkivoc 2005, xi, 48.
[8] H. Frauenrath Houben-Weyl, Methods of Organic Chemistry 1993,
Vol. E15b, p. 1383 (Eds H. Kropf, E. Schaumann) (Thieme: Stuttgart).
[9] H. Frauenrath Houben-Weyl, Methods of Organic Chemistry 1993,
Vol. E15b, p. 1468 (Eds H. Kropf, E. Schaumann) (Thieme: Stuttgart).
[10] T. M. Krygowski, M. K. Cyran˜ski, Z. Czarnocki, G. Ha¨felinger, A. R.
Katritzky, Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 1783. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(99)
00979-5
[34] H. Liu, C. S. Tomooka, H. W. Moore, Synth. Commun. 1997, 27, 2177.
doi:10.1080/00397919708006826
[35] L. S. Liebeskind, R. W. Fengl, K. R. Wirtz, T. T. Shawe, J. Org. Chem.
1988, 53, 2482. doi:10.1021/JO00246A017
[36] U. Noster, B. M. Hansen, B. Krische, K. H. Schulz, Contact Dermat.
1976, 2, 99. doi:10.1111/J.1600-0536.1976.TB02993.X
[37] J. Avalos, H. W. Moore, M. W. Reed, E. Rodriguez, Contact Dermat.
1989, 21, 341. doi:10.1111/J.1600-0536.1989.TB04757.X
[38] M. W. Reed, D. J. Pollart, S. T. Perri, L. D. Foland, H. W. Moore,
J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 2477. doi:10.1021/JO00246A016
[39] L. S. Liebeskind, K. R. Wirtz, J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5350.
doi:10.1021/JO00306A011
[40] K. Benda, T. Knoth, R. L. Danheiser, E. Schaumann, Tetrahedron Lett.
2010, in press.
[41] G. Oppermann, Diploma Thesis: Ringerweiterungsreaktionen von
4-Iminocyclobutenonen, Clausthal 2003.