Luciana Pereira et al.
FULL PAPERS
[2] a) E. I. Solomon, U. M. Sundaram, T. E. Machonkin,
Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 2563–2605; b) C. S. Stoj, D. J.
Kosman, in: Encyclopedia of Inorganic Chemistry, vol.
II, 2nd edn., (Ed. R. B. King), John Wiley & Sons, New
York, 2005, pp. 1134–1159.
[3] a) F. Xu, in: The Encyclopedia of Bioprocess Technolo-
gy: fermentation, biocatalysis, and bioseparation, (Eds.:
M.-C Flickinger, S. W. Drew), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
New York, 1999, pp 1545–1554; b) E. Torres, I. Bustos-
Jaimes, S. Le Borgne, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2003, 46,
1–15; c) S. R. Couto, J. L. T. Herrera, Biotechnol. Adv.
2006, 24, 500–513; d) O. V. Morozova, G. P. Shumako-
vich, M. A. Gorbacheva, S. V. Shleev, A. I. Yaropolov,
Biochemistry 2007, 72, 1136–1150.
[4] a) S. G. Burton, Curr. Org. Chem. 2003, 7, 1317–1331;
b) S. Riva, Trends Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 219–226; c) A.
Wells, M. Teria, T. Eve, Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006, 34,
304–306; d) A. Mikolasch, F. Schauer, Appl. Microbiol.
Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 605–624; e) S. Witayakran, A. J.
Ragauskas, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1187–1209;
f) M. Kidwai, R. Poddar, S. Diwaniyan, R. C. Kuhad,
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 589–595.
LC-ESI-Ion Trap Analysis
The ESI-ion trap MS system was a LCQ ion trap mass spec-
trometer (Thermofinnigan) equipped with electrospray
source and run by Xcalibur (Thermofinnigan) version 1.3
software. The HPLC separation was performed using the
conditions described above. The following conditions were
used in experiments with the ESI source in positive and neg-
ative modes: temperature of the heated capillary, 3508C;
source voltage 4.5 kV. Nitrogen was used as sheath gas and
auxiliary gas. The sheath and auxiliary gas flow rates were
80 and 20 arbitrary units, respectively. HPLC-MS was per-
formed in the full scan mode from m/z 50 to 2,000. All the
fragmentation experiments were done with 50% collision
energy.
GC-MS Analysis
The LAC3 reaction was stopped at times 0, 20, 40 and
60 min and the mixture extracted with diethyl ether (v/v)
containing 5 mg of 2-cyclohexenone as an internal standard.
The organic phase was first dried over sodium sulfate and
then analysed by GC-MS using an HP-6890 GC apparatus
coupled to an HP-5973 mass spectrometer. The column was
a DBWAX (30 m0.25 mm, 0.25 mm) and He was the carri-
er gas delivered at a 1 mL·minÀ1 flow rate. The following
programme was used for the elution: 408C for 2 min then
rising to 1508C at 108CminÀ1 and hold for 10 min. GC-MS
analysis of CotA reactions were performed at the Analytical
Laboratory, Analytic Services Unit, IBET, Portugal.
[5] L. Pereira, A. V. Coelho, C. A. Viegas, M. M. C. dos
Santos, M. P. Robalo, L. O. Martins, J. Biotechnol. 2009,
139, 68–77.
[6] C. Ganachaud, V. Garfagnoli, T. Tron, G. Iacazio, Tet-
rahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 2476–2478.
[7] a) C. OꢃNeil, F. R. Hawkes, D. L. Hawkes, N. D. Lour-
enÅo¸ H. M. Pinheiro, W. DelØe, J. Chem. Technol. Bio-
technol. 1999, 74, 1009–1018; b) T. Robinson, G.
McMullan, R. Marchant, P. Nigam, Bioresour. Technol.
2001, 77, 247–255; c) H. Chen, Curr. Protein Pept. Sci.
2006, 7, 101–111.
[8] a) I. Jäger, C. Hafner, K. Schneider, Mutat. Res. 2004,
561, 35–44; b) S. Vanhulle, M. Trosvalet, E. Enaud, M.
Lucas, M. Sonveaux, C. Decock, R. Onderwater, Y-J.
Schneider, A.-M. Corbisier, World J. Microbiol. Bio-
technol. 2008, 24, 337–344; c) S. Vanhulle, M. Trosvalet,
E. Enaud, M. Lucas, S. Taghavi, D. van der Lelie, B. va-
n Aken, R. C. A. Onderwater, D. Wesenberg, S. N.
Agathos, Y.-J. Schneider, A.-M. Corbisier, Environ. Sci.
Technol. 2008, 42, 584–589.
Toxicity Analysis
A previously described microplate toxicity assay based on
the inhibitory effects on the growth of a cell population of
S. cerevisiae BY4741 (at pH 6.5) was used with minor adap-
tations.[10,18] The lowest observed effect concentration
(LOEC) is defined as the lowest concentration of the dye
that affected yeast growth by around 5% and IC50 is the
concentration at which toxic effects produce 50% inhibition
of growth. Data reported are average values with standard
deviations of results from at least three independent toxicity
tests (with three replicas).
[9] H. S. Freeman, G. N. Mock, in: Kent and Riegelꢀs Hand-
book of Industrial Chemistry and Biotechnology, 11th
edn., (Ed.: J. A. Kent) Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,
2007, pp 499–590.
Acknowledgements
[10] a) Y. Wong, J. Yu, Water Res. 1999, 33, 3512–3520;
b) G. M. B. Soares, M. Costa-Ferreira, M. T. Pessoa
de Amorim, Bioresour. Technol. 2001, 79, 171–177;
c) H. Hou, J. Zhou, J. Wang. , C. Du, B. Yan, Process
Biochem. 2004, 39,1415–1419; d) Y. H. Lee, S. G. Pav-
lostathis, Water Res. 2004, 38, 1838–1852; e) G. Pal-
mieri, G. Gennamo, G. Sannia, Enzym. Microbiol.
Technol. 2005, 36, 17–24; f) P.-P. Champagne, J. A.
Ramsay, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 69, 276–
285; g) A. B. Dos Santos, I. A. E. Bisschops, F. J. Cer-
vantes, J. B. Van Lier, J. Biotechnol. 2005, 115, 345–
353; h) M. Alkan, S. C¸ elikÅapa, Ö. Demirbas¸, M.
Dogan, Dyes Pigm. 2005, 65, 251–259; i) R. Pogni, B.
Brogioni, M. C. Baratto, A. Sinicropi, P. Giardina, C.
Pezzela, G. Sannia, R. Basosi, Biocatal. Biotransform.
2007, 1–7; j) L. Lu, M. Zhao, B.-B. Zhang, S.-Y. Yu, X.-
This work was supported by FP6-NMP2-CT-2004-505899
and PTDC/BIO/72108/2006 grants. L. Pereira holds a Post-
Doc fellowship (SFRH/BPD/20744/2004) from Fundażo
para a CiÞncia e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal. We acknowl-
edge CERMAX at ITQB and Rede Nacional de RMN
(FCT) for access to the NMR facilities, and Helena Matias
for help in data acquisition. We thank Ana Rita Ferreira and
Catarina Costa for help in the toxicity assays.
References
[1] P. F. Lindley, in: Handbook on Metalloproteins, (I. Ber-
tini, A. Sigel, H. Sigel, H.), Marcel Dekler, Inc., New
York, 2001, pp 763–811.
1864
ꢂ 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1857 – 1865