A R T I C L E S
Sparapani et al.
number of genomic quadruplexes. Many other quadruplex-
binding small molecules have been reported,8a including a
number of acridine-based ligands;8b a particular challenge is
for a given ligand to have high selectivity for any chosen one
over other quadruplex structures, as well as to have low affinity
for duplex DNA, which is the overwhelming nucleic acid
background in the genome. Structural information has revealed
the presence of several distinctive topologies for telomeric qua-
druplexes, dependent on the nature of the cations present, and on
molecular crowding conditions.9,10 Although only a small number
of ligands have been evaluated to date by structural studies, these
at least generally appear to bind preferentially to parallel folded
arrangements of human telomeric G-quadruplexes.11,12
We describe here the rational design, synthesis and evaluation
of a series of novel triazole-acridine conjugates that bind with
high selectivity to human telomeric quadruplex structures, as
judged by interactions with intramolecular human parallel and
(3 + 1) hybrid antiparallel telomeric quadruplex DNAs.9a Their
design is based on a comparative study of the crystallographic
and NMR data on these human telomeric quadruplexes and the
two quadruplexes found in the promoter region of the c-kit
gene,13 and their selectivity is derived from differences in
accessible binding site dimensions between the different
quadruplexes.
postulated that the ring nitrogen atom of the acridine moiety
would be preferentially positioned over the central ion channel
in a quadruplex, and that directly attaching appropriate hetero-
cyclic rings at the 3- and 6-positions would maximize overlap
with guanine bases. Initially the ionization status of this nitrogen
atom was unknown; an initial supposition that it is protonated
at physiological pH was overturned by subsequent experiment
(see below). We also reasoned that triazole rings would be
optimal substituents at the 3- and 6-positions, because (a) they
offer minimal steric resistance to coplanarity with the acridine
group, and (b) their planarity and electron-richness could
enhance possible π-π interactions with G-quartets. A small
library of end-groups5c was designed (each attached to a phenyl
ring, to further enhance possible π-π G-quartet interactions).
Some variation in side-chain length has also been incorporated
in order to explore a range of distances between their two distant
3- and 6-ends.
Preliminary circular dichroism studies on ligand complexes
of the human telomeric quadruplex (see below) indicated that
in solution they probably exist as a mixture of topologies. Thus
modeling was performed on two distinct (parallel and antipar-
allel) topologies in order to approximate the solution situation.
The coordinate files for the human telomeric quadruplex X-ray
structure9a (PDB id 1KF1), an NMR-derived (3 + 1) hybrid
antiparallel human telomeric quadruplex structure9e (hybrid-2,
PDB id 2JPZ), together with the two c-kit quadruplex NMR
Results
structures (c-kit1, PDB id 2KQG;13b c-kit2, PDB id 203M13c
)
Molecular Modeling. Previous crystallographic analyses of
quadruplex-acridine complexes11a,14 have shown a singular
binding geometry for the acridine core, stacked onto the end of
the G-quartet stem of the quadruplex, with some π-π overlap
between two guanine bases and the acridine. This general type
of arrangement was therefore taken as a starting point for
subsequent modeling and structure prediction. It was initially
were used as starting-points for a series of systematic docking
studies followed by short molecular dynamics simulations to
find low-energy positions for each ligand bound to these
quadruplexes. The (3 + 1) hybrid-2 structure was employed
because it represents one of the several forms found by NMR
studies in solution, and by contrast with other hybrid structures
it did not require any structural modification in order to produce
a ligand binding platform. It was assumed, in accord with data
from crystallographic11,14 and NMR12,15 studies on quadruplex-
ligand complexes, that the ligands bind at one or other of the
terminal G-quartets in each structure. The docking thus explored
both 3′ and 5′ faces of each of these three quadruplexes. In
each case detailed ligand docking was focused on compounds
with side-chains each containing a methylene linker with 1-3
carbon atoms, and terminating in a pyrrolidine or a diethylamine
group (compounds 8a,b; 9a,b; 10a,b). In accord with poten-
tiometric studies, the central ring acridine nitrogen atom was
not protonated during the simulations, whereas the terminal side-
chain amine groups were considered to each carry a proton,
and thus a positive charge.
The modeling provides estimates of relative binding energies,
although these cannot reliably be compared between different
quadruplexes. Modeling with the two sets of human telomeric
quadruplex complexes (Table 1), indicated that compounds 9a,b
with two-carbon linkers overall bind consistently best to both
the parallel and the (3 + 1) structure, as judged by the calculated
relative binding energies. Examination of the models themselves
confirms this and shows (Figure 1a,b) that the side-chains are
able to make a large number of attractive close contacts with
the floor and walls of the grooves in these structures, and
significantly that there are few parts of the ligands that are not
on contact with DNA. It does appear that the complexes with
the parallel quadruplex have a slightly greater number of
(9) (a) Parkinson, G. N.; Lee, M. P. H.; Neidle, S. Nature 2002, 417,
876. (b) Phan, A. T.; Modi, Y. S.; Patel, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 8710. (c) Ambrus, A.; Chen, D.; Dai, J.; Jones, R. A.;
Yang, D. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 2048. (d) Ambrus, A.; Chen, D.;
Dai, J.; Bialis, T.; Jones, R. A.; Yang, D. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006,
34, 2723. (e) Dai, J.; Carver, M.; Punchihewa, M.; Jones, R. A.; Yang,
D. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 4927. (f) Lim, K. W.; Amrane, S.;
Bouaziz, S.; Xu, W.; Mu, Y.; Patel, D. J.; Luu, K. N.; Phan, A. T.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4301. (g) Haider, S. M.; Parkinson,
G. N.; Neidle, S. Biophys. J. 2008, 95, 296. Haider, S. M.; Neidle, S.
Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2009, 7, 583.
(10) Xue, Y.; Kan, Z. Y.; Wang, Q.; Yao, Y.; Liu, J.; Hao, Y. H.; Tan, Z.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11185. Renciuk, D.; Kejnovska´, I.;
Skola´kova´, P.; Bedna´rova´, K.; Motlova´, J.; Vorl´ıckova´, M. Nucleic
Acids Res. 2009, 37, 6625. Zheng, K.-W.; Chen, Z.; Hao, Y.-H.; Tan,
Z. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 327. Martino, L.; Pagano, B.;
Fotticchia, I.; Neidle, S.; Giancola, C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113,
14779.
(11) (a) Parkinson, G. N.; Ghosh, R.; Neidle, S. Biochemistry 2007, 46,
2390. (b) Parkinson, G. N.; Cuenca, F.; Neidle, S. J. Mol. Biol. 2008,
381, 1145. (c) Campbell, N. H.; Parkinson, G. N.; Reszka, A. P.;
Neidle, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6722.
(12) Phan, A. T.; Kuryavyi, V.; Gaw, H. Y.; Patel, D. J. Nature Chem.
Biol. 2005, 1, 167.
(13) (a) Rankin, S.; Reszka, A. P.; Huppert, J.; Zloh, M.; Parkinson, G. N.;
Todd, A. K.; Ladame, S.; Balasubramanian, S.; Neidle, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 10584. Phan, A. T.; Kuryavyi, V.; Burge, S.; Neidle,
S.; Patel, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4386. (b) Fernando, H.;
Reszka, A. P.; Huppert, J.; Ladame, S.; Rankin, S.; Venkitaraman,
A. R.; Neidle, S.; Balasubramanian, S. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 7854.
(bb) Phan, A. T.; Kuryavyi, V.; Burge, S.; Neidle, S.; Patel, D. J.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4386. (c) Hsu, S. T.; Varnai, P.; Bugaut,
A.; Reszka, A. P.; Neidle, S.; Balasubramanian, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 13399.
(14) Haider, S. M.; Parkinson, G. N.; Neidle, S. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 326,
117. Campbell, N. H.; Patel, M.; Tofa, A. B.; Ghosh, R.; Parkinson,
G. N.; Neidle, S. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 1675.
(15) Gavathiotis, E.; Heald, R. A.; Stevens, M. F.; Searle, M. S. J. Mol.
Biol. 2003, 334, 25.
9
12264 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 35, 2010