1182
H. Elamari et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 21 (2010) 1179–1183
R
N
Bn N3
2a
N
A-21•CuI
N
HN
HN
HN
CH2Cl2
O
O
O
neat
R-N3
(2b, 2c, 2d)
N
N
N
N
Bn
Bn
N
N
1g
1g2a
1g2a2b, 94%, R = CH2CO2Et
1g2a2c, 96%, R = (CH2)2OAc
1g2a2d, 99%, R = (CH2)3OH
52% (1,4) after
recrystallization
Scheme 2. Examples of sequential Huisgen reactions using a bisalkyne containing activated/unactivated alkynes to access dissymmetric bistriazoles.
third lower, equal, and higher than without additives. The use of
copper(I) catalyst also gave in these cases a complete selectivity
for the 1,4-isomers in good yields both for CuI (86–96%) and for
WyÁCuI (90–98%).
corresponding bistriazoles were obtained solely as their 1,4-iso-
mers in 94% 1g2a2b, 96% 1g2a2c, and 99% 1g2a2d isolated yields.
3. Conclusion
When looking at the results as a function of the additive used,
the average yields observed for Huisgen’s cycloaddition without
them (76%) was increased in each case. The order was found to
be SiO2 (90%), CuCl2 (89%), Al2O3/FeCl3 (87%), and MgCl2 (85%).
Copper(I) catalysis gave higher average yields of 93% (CuI) and
97% (WyÁCuI). It thus seemed that the use of such additives has a
positive effect on the global yields in this series.
The effect seemed to be related to the presence of the additives
since reactions conducted in their absence are giving lower conver-
sions. The effect cannot be attributed to the nature of the vial in
which the reaction was performed, since the use of borosilicate
or plastic test tubes did not change the outcome of the reactions.
If a catalytic effect is taking place here, it is possible that it can
be due to either the adsorption or the dispersion of the reagents
onto the additives, or by chelation. Complexation of the metals
by the carbonyl groups, or hydrogen bonding with silanols in the
case of silica, may increase the reactivity of the alkynes by a Lewis
acid-type catalysis. As an added proof, the reactions of propiolalde-
hyde diethyl acetal 1f (Table 2), where the carbonyl is masked, only
gave 2–4% conversion in the absence of additives or in the presence
of silica, which gave the best results in this study. Once again the
use of WyÁCuI gave the triazoles 1f2a–c in good yields 80–96%
and complete 1,4-selectivity.
In the case of CuCl2, using these conditions, it did not seem that
copper(I) was formed during its use since phenylacetylene 1a did
not react. The formation of the copper(I) species has been reported
while using copper(II) salts (CuCl2, Cu(OAc)2, and CuSO4) in water
or alcoholic solvents.9 The cuprous species generation was a result
of either oxidation of the alcohol or some Glaser coupling initially
taking place. Phenylacetylene 1a was found to react with azides in
these cases. However, the formation of some copper(I) cannot be
completely ruled out while using the activated alkynes 1b–e, even
if a total 1,4-selectivity was not observed here.
In order to demonstrate the utility of this study, we present
herein a first example of application using a bisalkyne incorporat-
ing both an activated and an unactivated acetylene (Scheme 2). N-
Propargylpropiolamide (1g)10 was first mixed with benzyl azide
(2a) in solvent- and additive-free conditions to form 1g2a in 84%
yield and in a 76:24 ratio in favor of the 1,4-isomer.11 The reaction
occurred only on the activated alkyne, no reaction was observed on
the propargyl side-chain. Recrystallization in ethanol gave 52% of
the pure 1,4-isomer of 1g2a which was used in the following steps.
The triazole–alkyne 1g2a was then reacted with ethyl azidoac-
etate 2b, 2-acetoxyethyl azide 2c, and 3-azidopropanol 2d. Since
1g2a is a solid, we decided to use a solution approach for this sec-
ond step using our previously described polymer-supported cop-
per(I) catalyst (Amberlyst A-21ÁCuI) in methylene chloride. The
Herein we have presented our findings on the behavior of car-
bonyl-bearing acetylenes in Huisgen’s cycloaddition under sol-
vent-free conditions. It was determined that these ‘activated’
alkynes reacted spontaneously with azides in moderate to good
yields. The addition of natural clays, or the use of metallic salts
and oxides, was found to have an effect on the efficiency of the
reaction of activated acetylenes. A catalytic influence was proposed
based on the presence of a carbonyl group on these alkynes and its
complexation with metals. Unactivated alkynes do not react under
these conditions, in the presence or absence of the additives. This
gave us the opportunity to present a first example of a sequential
and regioselective formation of dissymmetric bistriazoles based
on reactivity differences for a molecule bearing both activated
and unactivated acetylenes. This approach has many applications
to selectively introduce triazole rings to functionalize or form
derivatives and analogues of chiral natural products, such as amino
acids or peptides. Results on this subject will be presented in due
course.
Acknowledgments
Fellowship for an international thesis from Tunisia for H.E. is
greatly acknowledged. This work has been conducted under the
grants CNRS 8151 and INSERM 1022.
References
1. (a) Kolb, H. C.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 113,
2056–2075. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2004–2021; (b) Kolb, H. C.;
Sharpless, K. B. Drug Discovery Today 2003, 8, 1128–1137; (c) Moses, J. E.;
Moorhouse, A. D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 1249–1262.
2. (a) Huisgen, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1963, 75, 604–637; Huisgen, R. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1963, 2, 565–598; (b) Tornøe, C. W.; Meldal, M. In 17th
American Peptides Symposium Proceedings Book Peptides: The Wave of the Future.
In Copper(I)-Catalyzed 1,3-Dipolar Cycloadditions on Solid phase; Lebl, M.;
Houghten, R.A., Eds; American Peptide Society and Kluwer Academic: San
Diego, 2001; pp. 263–264.; (c) Tornøe, C. W.; Christensen, C.; Meldal, M. J. Org.
Chem. 2002, 67, 3057–3064; (d) Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.;
Sharpless, K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 114, 2708–2711. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 2596–2599; (e) Bock, V. D.; Hiemstra, H.; van Maarseveen, J. H.
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 51–68; (f) Wu, P.; Fokin, V. V. Aldrichim. Acta 2007, 40,
7–17; (g) Meldal, M.; Tornøe, C. W. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2952–3015.
3. (a) Beckmann, H. S. G.; Wittmann, V. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1–4; (b) Tao, C.-Z.; Cui,
X.; Li, J.; Liu, A.-X.; Liu, L.; Guo, Q.-X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 3525–3529; (c)
Barral, K.; Moorhouse, A. D.; Moses, J. E. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1809–1811.
4. (a) Zhang, X.; Hsung, R. P.; Li, H. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2420–2422; (b)
Bertrand, P.; Gesson, J.-P. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3596–3599; (c) Peddibhotla, S.;
Dang, Y.; Liu, J. O.; Romo, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12222–12231.
5. (a) Appukkuttan, P.; Dehaen, W.; Fokin, V. V.; Van der Eycken, E. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 4223–4225; (b) Himo, F.; Lovell, T.; Hilgraf, R.; Rostovtsev, V. V.; Noodleman,
L.; Sharpless, K. B.; Fokin, V. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 210–216; (c) David,