ORGANIC
LETTERS
2007
Vol. 9, No. 26
5581-5583
Carbonylation of Epoxides to
Substituted 3-Hydroxy- -Lactones
δ
John W. Kramer, Daniel Y. Joh, and Geoffrey W. Coates*
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Baker Laboratory,
Cornell UniVersity, Ithaca, New York 14853-1301
Received October 22, 2007
ABSTRACT
Substituted 3-hydroxy-δ-lactones (3HLs) are valuable intermediates in the synthesis of pharmaceuticals and other biologically active natural
products. Herein we report the first example of the catalytic carbonylation of substituted homoglycidols to 3HLs using HCo(CO)4. Upon optimization
of the catalyst and reaction conditions, a functionally diverse set of 3HLs was prepared. Mechanistic insight was gained by observation of the
carbonylation reaction using in situ IR spectroscopy, and we propose a mechanism that is consistent with previously studied epoxide
carbonylation systems.
Substituted 3-hydroxy-δ-lactones (3HLs) are common struc-
tural motifs in natural products1 and are valuable as
intermediates in the synthesis of a variety of pharmaceutical
compounds.2-5 3HLs are most prominent in the class of
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors known as statins, which are
among the most potent cholesterol-lowering drugs available
and constitute five of the top 100 selling drugs.5 All approved
statins have side chains comprising either a 3HL or the
hydrolyzed 3,5-dihydroxycarboxylic acid analogue (Figure
1), which are essential for the bioactivity of statin drugs.6
Figure 1. Structures of two common statin drugs with 3HL portions
3HLs have also been used in the synthesis of important drugs
such as tetrahydrolipstatin,2 a lipase inhibitor prescribed for
the treatment of obesity, and the antiretroviral agent tipranavir.3
Furthermore, dehydration of 3HLs produces a class of
biologically active R,â-unsaturated lactone natural products.4
highlighted.
As a result of their synthetic value, the synthesis of 3HLs
has received a great deal of attention in recent years.7-10
Biocatalytic routes have proven successful in the synthesis
(1) Aggarwal, V. K.; Bae, I.; Lee, H.-Y. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 9725-
9733.
(2) Sharma, A.; Chattopadhyay, S. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 8059-8062.
(3) Cefalo, D. R.; Kiely, A. F.; Wuchrer, M.; Jamieson, J. Y.; Schrock,
R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3139-3140.
(4) Stevenson, R.; Weber, J. V. J. Nat. Prod. 1988, 51, 1215-1219.
(5) (a) Tolbert, J. A. Nat. ReV. Drug DiscoVery 2003, 2, 517-526. (b)
de Lorenzo, F.; Feher, M.; Martin, J.; Collot-Teixeira, S.; Dotsenko, O.;
McGregor, J. L. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 3385-3393.
(6) (a) Ranganathan, A.; Timoney, M.; Bycroft, M.; Corte´s, J.; Thomas,
I. P.; Wilkinson, B.; Kellenberger, L.; Hanefeld, U.; Galloway, I. S.;
Staunton, J.; Leadlay, P. F. Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, 731-738. (b) Greenberg,
W. A.; Varvak, A.; Hanson, S. R.; Wong, K.; Huang, H.; Chen, P.; Burk,
M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5788-5793.
(7) (a) Gijsen, H. J.; Wong, C.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 7585-
7591. (b) Heine, A.; Luz, J. G.; Wong, C.-H.; Wilson, I. A. J. Mol. Biol.
2004, 343, 1019-1034.
(8) (a) Loubinoux, B.; Sinnes, J.-L.; O’Sullivan, A. C.; Winkler, T.
Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 3549-3558. (b) Kim, S.-J.; Kang, H.-Y.; Sherman,
D. H. Synthesis 2001, 1790-1793. (c) Le Sann, C.; Mun˜oz, D. M.; Saunders,
N.; Simpson, T. J.; Smith, D. I.; Soulas, F.; Watts, P.; Willis, C. L. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2005, 3, 1719-1728.
(9) Reddy, M. V. R.; Brown, H. C.; Ramachandran, P. V. J. Organomet.
Chem. 2001, 624, 239-243.
(10) Fournier, L.; Gaudel-Siri, A.; Kocienski, P. J.; Pons, J.-M. Synlett
2003, 107-111.
10.1021/ol702475e CCC: $37.00
© 2007 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 11/21/2007