ever, significant steric congestion adjacent to the olefin
reduced the reaction rate (it was necessary to conduct this
reaction at 70 °C for efficient cyclization) and led to a
reversal in the regioselectivity (entry 3).
We also observed a loss of regioselectivity in the cycliza-
tion of the aromatic substrate N-nosyl-2-allylaniline (entry
4). For the bicyclic sulfamate ester substrates outlined in
entries 5 and 6, cylization proceeded both regio- and
diastereoselectivly to provide the piperidine products in good
yields as single diastereomers.
provide the pyrrolidine products, with only cis-N-nosyl-1-
amino-4-hexene providing significant quantites of the pip-
eridine product (entry 2). For 1,2-dialkylolefins, we observe
an anti addition of the nitrogen and acetate across the double
bond, regardless of the regiochemical outcome of the reaction
(entries 1, 2, and 6). This outcome is in contrast to the
previously reported metal free system, in which 5-exo
cyclizations gave syn addition products and 6-endo cycliza-
tions exhibited anti selectivity.8a For the phenyl-substituted
olefins (entries 3 and 4), both olefin isomers converge on a
single product diastereomer, corresponding to antiaminoac-
etoxylation across the trans-olefin. In the case of the
isopropyl-substituted olefin (entry 5), an unusual 1,3-ami-
noacetoxylated product was obtained.
Additionally we have investigated the aminoacetoxyla-
tion of 1,2-disubstituted olefins (Table 3). Importantly, the
These reaction outcomes are consistent with a mechanism
in which the copper catalyst and the N-nosylamine combine
under the oxidative conditions to form an electrophilic
copper(III) amido species (Scheme 2).10,11
Table 3. Intramolecular Aminoacetoxylation of 1,2-Disubstituted
Olefinsa
Scheme 2. Proposed Catalytic Cycle Accounting for Observed
Regio- and Diastereoselectivity: (i) Initial Oxidation to Cu(III)
Amide; (ii) Nucleophile Attacks Carbon Most Able To Stabilize
a Positive Charge Resulting in Anti Addition of the Nucleophile
and Copper Across the Olefin; (iii) Reductive Elimination
Coordination of the tethered olefin to the Cu(III) center
activates the double bond for anti attack by an external
acetate, with the nucelophile attacking at the position most
able to stabilize a positive charge. Thus, in the case of
monosubstituted olefins, acetate attack occurs at the internal
position, leading to the observed endo cyclization.12 If the
(10) For exaples of well-defined oganometallic Cu(III) complexes, see:
(a) Willert-Porada, M. A.; Burton, D. J.; Baenziger, N. C. J. Chem. Soc.,
Chem. Commun. 1989, 1633. (b) Naumann, D.; Roy, T.; Tebbe, K.-F.;
Crump, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1482. (c) Furuta, H.;
Maeda, H.; Osuka, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 803. (d) Ribas, X.;
Jackson, D. A.; Donnadieu, B.; Mah´ıa, J.; Parella, T.; Xifra, R.; Hedman,
B.; Hodgson, K. O.; Llobet, A.; Stack, T. D. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 2991. (e) Santo, R.; Miyamoto, R.; Tanaka, R.; Nishioka, T.;
Sato, K.; Toyota, K.; Obata, M.; Yano, S.; Kinoshita, I.; Ichimura, A.; Takui,
a Reaction conditions: 10 mol % of Cu(CH3CN)4PF6, 1.5 equiv of
PhI(OAc)2, 1.0 equiv of K2CO3, rt, CH2Cl2. b Isolated yield. In cases where
two regioisomers were obtained, the combined yield is reported with the
product ratio in parentheses. c The stereochemistry was determined by X-ray
crystallography; see the Supporting Information for details. d The stereo-
chemistry was determined by NOE experiments; see the Supporting
Information for details.
T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7611
.
(11) For C-N bond formation from Cu(III) coumpounds, see: (a)
Huffman, L. M.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9196. (b) Casitas,
A.; King, A. E.; Parella, T.; Costas, M.; Stahl, S. S.; Ribas, X. Chem. Sci.
standard reaction conditions provide cyclic aminoacetoxyl-
ation products in good to excellent yields. In most cases,
we observe a significant preference for 5-exo cyclization to
2010, DOI: 10.1039/c0sc00245c
.
(12) For related anti nucleometalations, see: (a) Åkermark, B.; Ba¨ckvall,
J. E.; Siirala-Hanse´n, K.; Sjo¨berg, K.; Zetterberg, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974,
15, 1363. (b) Åkermark, B.; Ba¨ckvall, J. E.; Hegedus, L. S.; Zetterberg,
K.; Siirala-Hanse´n, K.; Sjo¨berg, K. J. Organomet. Chem. 1974, 72, 127.
(c) Hegedus, L. S.; Allen, G. F.; Waterman, E. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976,
98, 2674. (d) Ba¨ckvall, J. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1983, 16, 335.
(9) (a) Thornton, A. R.; Blakey, S. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
5020. (b) Thornton, A. R.; Martin, V. I.; Blakey, S. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2009, 131, 2434.
4112
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 18, 2010