C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
range.8 This indicates that the critical concentration of the capsule
16 ·I12 is considerably lower than 1 µM.
selectively formed by the hydrophobic effect as well as the template
effect. Alternative aggregation structures would be possible based
on the precise design of hydrophobic surface of amphiphiles.
As demonstrated by the crystal structure, the box-shaped
aggregate has a hydrophobic inner space for encapsulating hydro-
phobic molecules. The 0.8 × 0.8 nm inner space of 16 ·I12 is large
enough to accommodate two guest molecules 5. Upon the addition
of 5 to a solution of 16 ·I12 in D2O, though 5 is insoluble in D2O,
two molecules of 5 were encapsulated inside 16 ·I12. A signal for
methyl groups of 5 appeared at δ ) 3.49 ppm, which is downfield
shifted compared with that of free 5 in CD3OD (∆δ ) +0.85 ppm)
(Figure 2c).
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aids
from MEXT of Japan and Global COE Program for Chemistry
Innovation.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, 1H NMR
and UV spectra, and X-ray structure data in CIF format. This material
References
Formation of the hexameric aggregate depends substantially on
the number of N-methylpyridinium groups introduced into am-
phiphiles. In the case of amphiphile 3·I with one N-methylpyri-
dinium group, hexameric aggregates with several structural isomers
were formed in aqueous methanol8 but were insoluble in water.
On the other hand, in the case of 4·I3 with three N-methylpyri-
dinium groups, a water-soluble tetrahedron-shaped capsule [44⊃6]I12
was built up from four gear-shaped amphiphiles 4·I3 and a template
guest molecule 6 (Figure 4). A sharp 1H NMR spectrum of [44⊃6]I12
in D2O was consistent with a highly symmetric structure of the
tetrahedron-shaped capsule (Figure 4c, see also the Supporting
Information for a previously reported tetrameric capsule,8 24⊃6).
The tendency of 4·I3 to form a stable tetrameric capsule originates
from its own aggregation behavior. In a 1H NMR spectrum of 4·I3
in D2O, the signals for a tetrameric capsule 44 ·I12 were observed
(1) (a) Azov, V. On Amphiphiles, Membranes, and Vesicles: Reactions Within
and Between Bilayer Membranes. Synthesis and Properties of Water-Soluble
Molecular Asterisks; VDM Verlag: Saarbru¨cken, 2009. (b) Bangham, A. D.;
Horne, R. W. J. Mol. Biol. 1964, 8, 660. (c) Kunitake, T. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 709. (d) Fuhrhop, J. H.; Liman, U.; Koesling, V.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 6840.
(2) (a) Israelachvili, J. N.; Mitchell, D. J.; Ninham, B. W. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
Trans. 1976, 2, 1525. (b) Ryu, J. H.; Hong, D. J.; Lee, M. Chem. Commun.
2008, 1043. (c) Shimizu, T.; Masuda, M.; Minamikawa, H. Chem. ReV. 2005,
105, 1401. (d) Zhou, S.; Burger, C.; Chu, B.; Sawamura, M.; Nagahama,
N.; Toganoh, M.; Hackler, U. E.; Isobe, H.; Nakamura, E. Science 2001,
291, 1944. (e) Hill, J. P.; Jin, W.; Kosaka, A.; Fukushima, T.; Ichihara, H.;
Shimomura, T.; Ito, K.; Hashizume, T.; Ishii, N.; Aida, T. Science 2004,
304, 1481. (f) Harada, A.; Kataoka, K. Science 1999, 283, 65. (g) Percec,
V.; Wilson, D. A.; Leowanawat, P.; Wilson, C. J.; Hughes, A. D.; Kaucher,
M. S.; Hammer, D. A.; Levine, D. H.; Kim, A. J.; Bates, F. S. Science 2010,
328, 1009. (h) Baram, J.; Shirman, E.; Ben-Shitrit, N.; Ustinov, A.;
Weissman, H.; Pinkas, I.; Wolf, S. G.; Rybtchinski, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 14966. (i) Zhang, X.; Chen, Z.; Wu¨rthner, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 4886. (j) Hartgerink, J. D.; Beniash, E.; Stupp, S. I. Science 2001,
294, 1684. (k) Otto, S.; Furlan, R. L. E.; Sanders, J. K. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2000, 122, 12063.
(3) (a) Tanford, C. The Hydrophobic Effect: Formation of Micelles and
Biological Membranes; Wiley Interscience: New York, 1980. (b) Meyer,
E. E.; Rosenberg, K. J.; Israelachvili, J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006,
103, 15739. (c) Chandler, D. Nature 2005, 437, 640.
(4) For examples of self-assembled capsules formed by the hydrophobic effect,
see: (a) Gibb, C. L. D.; Gibb, B. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11408.
(b) Liu, S.; Gibb, B. C. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3709.
in addition to those of a hexameric capsule 46 ·I18 (44 ·I12:46 ·I18
)
1:9, Figure 4b),8 in clear contrast to the fact that no tetrameric
capsules were formed from the other gear-shaped amphiphiles
1-3·I without template guests. The relative stability of tetrahedron-
shaped capsule 44 ·I12 is well explained by the electrostatic repulsion
among three pyridinium groups of 4·I3.8 That is, different discrete
capsule structures can be constructed by utilizing electrostatic
interactions between pyridinium (and pyridyl) rings incorporated
into the gear-shaped amphiphiles.
(5) For double-helix formation of oligoresorcinols in water, see: (a) Goto, H.;
Katagiri, H.; Furusho, Y.; Yashima, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7176.
(b) Goto, H.; Furusho, Y.; Yashima, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 109.
(c) Goto, H.; Furusho, Y.; Yashima, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9168.
(d) Goto, H.; Furusho, Y.; Miwa, K.; Yashima, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009,
131, 4710.
In conclusion, the construction of truly monodisperse aggregates
was achieved in pure water using purposefully designed gear-shaped
amphiphiles. The studies of both the solution and the crystal
structures of the hexameric capsule 16 ·I12 revealed that the
amphiphiles 1·I2 engage one another so as to reduce the area of
water-exposed hydrophobic surfaces, and that the meshing structure
gives rise to extremely high stability in water. Furthermore, the
tetrameric aggregate [44⊃6]I12 with another amphiphile, 4·I3, was
(6) Hiraoka, S.; Harano, K.; Shiro, M.; Shionoya, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 14368.
(7) Hiraoka, S.; Harano, K.; Nakamura, T.; Shiro, M.; Shionoya, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7006.
(8) See the Supporting Information.
(9) No further aggregation of 16 · I12 capsule was observed, probably due to the
electrostatic repulsion that would occur between the positive charges on the
outer surface of the capsules.
JA1069135
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 38, 2010 13225